Table 1.

Tritonia diomedea showed stronger orientation into flow with upstream prey or conspecifics than into flow without upstream odour sources in the flow tank

Rayleigh
Paired Wilcoxon
OdourTreatmentNθ (deg.)rznP-value95% CL (deg.)PairsTP
Prey Experimental 0.98 8.69 <0.0001 008, 352 0.05 
 Control 342 0.78 5.42 0.002 014, 310    
Conspecific Experimental 17 357 0.96 15.7 <0.0001 005, 348 14 20 0.025 
 Control 16 329 0.71 8.08 0.0001 021, 329    
Rayleigh
Paired Wilcoxon
OdourTreatmentNθ (deg.)rznP-value95% CL (deg.)PairsTP
Prey Experimental 0.98 8.69 <0.0001 008, 352 0.05 
 Control 342 0.78 5.42 0.002 014, 310    
Conspecific Experimental 17 357 0.96 15.7 <0.0001 005, 348 14 20 0.025 
 Control 16 329 0.71 8.08 0.0001 021, 329    

Slug orientations were measured with (Experimental) and without (Control)prey or conspecifics in the upstream odour stimulus chamber.

The mean headings are relative to flow (θ, r;0°=upstream) while unobstructed by tank walls etc. Rayleigh test z statistic and P-value assess the significance of the mean heading. We also tested if the dispersion of headings around upstream was reduced in experimentals over controls for those animals with unobstructed orientation during both trials (Wilcoxon paired-sample test T-statistic and one-tailed P-value).

Under all conditions, slugs were oriented significantly upstream [95%confidence limits (CL) include upstream], and for both odour types, slugs in experimental trials had significantly lower dispersion than controls, i.e. stronger orientation into flow with upstream prey or conspecifics than without.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal