Table 2.

Summary of the principal components analysis examining variation in the double-whistle and its relation to male mating success

Raw distribution (mean±s.d.)PC1PC2
Frequency difference 578.1±106.6 Hz 0.795 –0.70 
Relative time of termination 0.70±0.11 s 0.181 0.873 
Relative amplitude (scale 0–3) 1.91±0.67 0.807 –0.006 
Proportion with DW 0.68±0.26 0.357 –0.769 
Eigenvalue n.a. 1.583 1.219 
Percentage of variance explained n.a. 39.6 30.4 
Spearman correlation with mating success n.a. –0.182 0.039 
P-value for significance of Spearman correlation n.a. 0.35 0.845 
Raw distribution (mean±s.d.)PC1PC2
Frequency difference 578.1±106.6 Hz 0.795 –0.70 
Relative time of termination 0.70±0.11 s 0.181 0.873 
Relative amplitude (scale 0–3) 1.91±0.67 0.807 –0.006 
Proportion with DW 0.68±0.26 0.357 –0.769 
Eigenvalue n.a. 1.583 1.219 
Percentage of variance explained n.a. 39.6 30.4 
Spearman correlation with mating success n.a. –0.182 0.039 
P-value for significance of Spearman correlation n.a. 0.35 0.845 

DW, double whistle; n.a., not applicable

View Large
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.
Accept