Table 1.

Comparison of scaling of suction morphology, kinematics and buccal pressure to standard length (or cranial length) based on published reports in five fish species

SpeciesMorphologyStrike durationPressure
Largemouth bass Decreasing lever arm ratio of lower jaw with size1 Increasing with size1 No significant trend2 
Bluegill sunfish Decreasing lever arm ratio of lower jaw with size3 Increasing with size3 Decreasing with size2 
Spotted sunfish Decreasing lever arm ratio of lower jaw with size3 Increasing with size3 No significant trend2,4 
African catfish Isometric growth of lever arm ratio of lower jaw and positive allometry of muscle cross-section with size5 Increasing with size6 Mean pressure decreasing with size (marginally significant)7 
Snook Isometric growth of sternohyoideus muscle and buccal cavity area8  No significant trend8 
SpeciesMorphologyStrike durationPressure
Largemouth bass Decreasing lever arm ratio of lower jaw with size1 Increasing with size1 No significant trend2 
Bluegill sunfish Decreasing lever arm ratio of lower jaw with size3 Increasing with size3 Decreasing with size2 
Spotted sunfish Decreasing lever arm ratio of lower jaw with size3 Increasing with size3 No significant trend2,4 
African catfish Isometric growth of lever arm ratio of lower jaw and positive allometry of muscle cross-section with size5 Increasing with size6 Mean pressure decreasing with size (marginally significant)7 
Snook Isometric growth of sternohyoideus muscle and buccal cavity area8  No significant trend8 
1

(Richard and Wainwright,1995)

2

(Carroll et al., 2004)

3

(Wainwright and Shaw,1999)

4

Narrow size range and small sample size

5

(Herrel et al., 2005)

6

(Van Wassenbergh et al.,2005)

7

(Van Wassenbergh et al.,2006b)

8

(Wainwright et al.,2006)

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal