Table 4.

Axial versus bending strain magnitudes across bones and experimental condition



Metacarpus

Radius

Outdoor
Treadmill
Outdoor
Treadmill
N 
Bending strain 84±24 43±31 446±82 493±68 
Axial strain –210±39 –194±8 –167±41 –123±70 
Bending to axial ratio (magnitudes) 0.40 0.22 2.67 4.02 
CV axial –0.66±0.26 –0.35±0.01 –0.59±0.14 –0.24±0.16 
CV bending
 
1.06±0.16
 
0.65±0.05
 
0.33±0.01††
 
0.23±0.02**,†††
 


Metacarpus

Radius

Outdoor
Treadmill
Outdoor
Treadmill
N 
Bending strain 84±24 43±31 446±82 493±68 
Axial strain –210±39 –194±8 –167±41 –123±70 
Bending to axial ratio (magnitudes) 0.40 0.22 2.67 4.02 
CV axial –0.66±0.26 –0.35±0.01 –0.59±0.14 –0.24±0.16 
CV bending
 
1.06±0.16
 
0.65±0.05
 
0.33±0.01††
 
0.23±0.02**,†††
 

All values are means ± s.e.m. CV, coefficient of variation

Asterisks indicate significant differences between outdoor vstreadmill values for the same bone (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001)

Daggers indicate significant differences between the metacarpus and radius within the same experimental condition (P<0.05, ††P<0.01, †††P<0.001)

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal