. | Gastrophysa viridula . | Carausius morosus . |
---|---|---|
Effect of fluid accumulation on shear stress | Decrease to 44% | Decrease to 32% |
(Page's L test: L10,5=1888, P<0.001) | (Page's L test: L7,10=1037, P<0.001) | |
Effect of fluid depletion on shear stress | Increase to 123%, from first to third | |
(Page's L test: L3,5=68, P=0.0089) | No significant effect | |
No significant effect from third slide | (ANOVA, F1,7=0.284, P>0.1) | |
(Page's L test: L8,5=816, P>0.05) | ||
Effect of increased normal forces on: | ||
Friction force | No significant effect | Significant increase |
(ANOVA: F2,15=2.015, P>0.05) | (ANOVA, F1,19=8.05, P<0.01) | |
Contact area | No significant effect | Significant increase |
(ANOVA: F2,15=2.482, P>0.05) | (ANOVA, F1,19=45.8, P<0.001) | |
Shear stress | No significant effect | No significant effect |
(ANOVA: F2,15=0.748, P>0.05) | (ANOVA, F1,19=0.09, P>0.05) | |
Loads | 0.1, 1, 5 nM | –0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 mN |
Reference | Present study | Drechsler and Federle, 2006 |
. | Gastrophysa viridula . | Carausius morosus . |
---|---|---|
Effect of fluid accumulation on shear stress | Decrease to 44% | Decrease to 32% |
(Page's L test: L10,5=1888, P<0.001) | (Page's L test: L7,10=1037, P<0.001) | |
Effect of fluid depletion on shear stress | Increase to 123%, from first to third | |
(Page's L test: L3,5=68, P=0.0089) | No significant effect | |
No significant effect from third slide | (ANOVA, F1,7=0.284, P>0.1) | |
(Page's L test: L8,5=816, P>0.05) | ||
Effect of increased normal forces on: | ||
Friction force | No significant effect | Significant increase |
(ANOVA: F2,15=2.015, P>0.05) | (ANOVA, F1,19=8.05, P<0.01) | |
Contact area | No significant effect | Significant increase |
(ANOVA: F2,15=2.482, P>0.05) | (ANOVA, F1,19=45.8, P<0.001) | |
Shear stress | No significant effect | No significant effect |
(ANOVA: F2,15=0.748, P>0.05) | (ANOVA, F1,19=0.09, P>0.05) | |
Loads | 0.1, 1, 5 nM | –0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 mN |
Reference | Present study | Drechsler and Federle, 2006 |