. | . | Number . | . | . | . | . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study . | Constraint . | Data points in Fig. 3 . | Subjects . | Trials/subject . | Trials/study . | % of total trials . | |||
Cavanagh (1982) | d-constrained | 7 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 6.1 | |||
Knuttgen (1961) | Fully constrained | 9 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 7.9 | |||
v-constrained | 11 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 9.6 | ||||
Liefeldt (1992) | v-constrained | 6 | 9 | 3 | 27 | 23.7 | |||
Rouviere (2002) | Fully constrained | 12 | 5 | 12 | 60 | 52.6 | |||
Total | 28 | 114 | 100.0 |
. | . | Number . | . | . | . | . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study . | Constraint . | Data points in Fig. 3 . | Subjects . | Trials/subject . | Trials/study . | % of total trials . | |||
Cavanagh (1982) | d-constrained | 7 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 6.1 | |||
Knuttgen (1961) | Fully constrained | 9 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 7.9 | |||
v-constrained | 11 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 9.6 | ||||
Liefeldt (1992) | v-constrained | 6 | 9 | 3 | 27 | 23.7 | |||
Rouviere (2002) | Fully constrained | 12 | 5 | 12 | 60 | 52.6 | |||
Total | 28 | 114 | 100.0 |