Table 4.

Effect of various treatments on unidirectional secretory,unidirectional reabsorptive and net urate fluxes by chick PTCs

TreatmentNSideNonspecificSecretoryReabsorptiveNet
Control   100 34±5.9 65±5.9 
K+ (30 mmol l-1↓TER 133±19.2 59±13.3 73±17.3 
Control   100 34±4.9 65±4.9 
Glucose-free Iglu 116±15.9 36±4.8 80±13.6 
Control   100 34±7.3 65±7.4 
Cl- free No 89±15.3 44±11.3 45±16.0 
Control   100 33±7.4 67±7.4 
pH 7.7 Iglu 125±17.2 49±14.9 75±5.6 
Control   100 34±7.6 66±7.6 
Oxonic acid (2.5 mmol l-1No 98±3.4 41±7.4 57±4.2 
Control   100 33±6.2 66±6.2 
Pyrazine (2 mmol l-1No 123±18.2 44±14.6 78±32.4 
Control   100 31±4.2 68±4.2 
Adenosine (2 mmol l-1No 112±15.7 39±11.0 72±18.6 
Control   100 31±4.8 68±4.8 
Nicotinic acid (0.3 mmol l-1No 82±8.4 34±7.6 48±15.3 
Control   100 36±9.0 63±9.0 
Nocodozole (0.03 mmol l-1Both Iglu 114±27.4 70±21.5* 44±8.5 
Control   100 28±5.3 71±5.3 
Cytochalsin D (10-3 mmol l-1Both ↓TER 124±15.3 120±38.9* 4±23.8* 
TreatmentNSideNonspecificSecretoryReabsorptiveNet
Control   100 34±5.9 65±5.9 
K+ (30 mmol l-1↓TER 133±19.2 59±13.3 73±17.3 
Control   100 34±4.9 65±4.9 
Glucose-free Iglu 116±15.9 36±4.8 80±13.6 
Control   100 34±7.3 65±7.4 
Cl- free No 89±15.3 44±11.3 45±16.0 
Control   100 33±7.4 67±7.4 
pH 7.7 Iglu 125±17.2 49±14.9 75±5.6 
Control   100 34±7.6 66±7.6 
Oxonic acid (2.5 mmol l-1No 98±3.4 41±7.4 57±4.2 
Control   100 33±6.2 66±6.2 
Pyrazine (2 mmol l-1No 123±18.2 44±14.6 78±32.4 
Control   100 31±4.2 68±4.2 
Adenosine (2 mmol l-1No 112±15.7 39±11.0 72±18.6 
Control   100 31±4.8 68±4.8 
Nicotinic acid (0.3 mmol l-1No 82±8.4 34±7.6 48±15.3 
Control   100 36±9.0 63±9.0 
Nocodozole (0.03 mmol l-1Both Iglu 114±27.4 70±21.5* 44±8.5 
Control   100 28±5.3 71±5.3 
Cytochalsin D (10-3 mmol l-1Both ↓TER 124±15.3 120±38.9* 4±23.8* 

Data are presented as a percentage of the paired control secretory flux and are means ± s.e.m. (N=the number of preparations). The treatments were administered to the luminal side of the epithelium alone(L) or both the interstitial and luminal sides of the epithelium (both). Transepithelial resistance (TER) and phlorizin-sensitive glucose current(Iglu), measures of proximal tubule-like function and tissue viability, were monitored to determine if treatments were nonspecific. No effect of the treatment on TER or Iglu (No). ↓TER and ↓Iglu indicate a decrease in transepithelial resistance and phlorizin-sensitive glucose current, respectively(P<0.05, paired t-test).

*

Significantly different from paired control, P<0.05, paired t-test

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal