Table 1.

Effects of forskolin, theophylline and db-cAMP on bioelectrical parameters across the duodenal mucosa of Gallotia galloti

PD (mV)Isc (μequiv. cm-2 h-1)Gt (mS cm-2)
Control 2.01±0.2 1.01±0.15 7.95±1.1 
Forskolin 2.80±0.2** 1.50±0.2* 8.95±1.2 
(10 μmol l-1   
(16)    
Control 2.3±0.2 0.70±0.15 8.01±0.6 
Theophylline 2.8±0.2* 1.15±0.18* 8.05±0.5 
(3 mmol l-1   
(12)    
Control 2.60±0.2 0.60±0.1 8.01±0.8 
db-cAMP 3.05±0.1* 0.95±0.1* 8.01±0.5 
(500 μmol l-1   
(8)    
PD (mV)Isc (μequiv. cm-2 h-1)Gt (mS cm-2)
Control 2.01±0.2 1.01±0.15 7.95±1.1 
Forskolin 2.80±0.2** 1.50±0.2* 8.95±1.2 
(10 μmol l-1   
(16)    
Control 2.3±0.2 0.70±0.15 8.01±0.6 
Theophylline 2.8±0.2* 1.15±0.18* 8.05±0.5 
(3 mmol l-1   
(12)    
Control 2.60±0.2 0.60±0.1 8.01±0.8 
db-cAMP 3.05±0.1* 0.95±0.1* 8.01±0.5 
(500 μmol l-1   
(8)    

Number of experiments for each experimental condition indicated in parentheses. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 compared with control tissues.

db-cAMP, dibutyryl cAMP; PD, potential difference; Isc,short-circuit current; Gt, tissue conductance.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal