Case . | Source . | Fig. . | \({\Delta}{\hat{{\tau}}}_{\mathrm{t}}\)
. | \({\Delta}{\hat{{\tau}}}_{\mathrm{r}}\)
. | \({\hat{{\tau}}}_{\mathrm{f}}\)
. | x̂ o . | αdown . | αup . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM1 | 1 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.32 | -0.08 | 0.2 | -50 | 70 |
PM2 | 1 | 3 | 0.12 | 0.32 | -0.08 | 0.2 | -50 | 50 |
PM3 | 1 | 3 | 0.12 | 0.32 | 0.08 | 0.2 | -50 | 50 |
VM1 | 2 | 6 | 0.24 | 0.32 | -0.08 | 0.2 | -50 | 50 |
VM2 | 2 | 6 | 0.105 | 0.32 | -0.08 | 0.2 | -50 | 50 |
VM3 | 2 | 11 | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0 | 0.2 | -50 | 50 |
VM4 | 2 | 11 | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0.08 | 0.2 | -50 | 50 |
Case . | Source . | Fig. . | \({\Delta}{\hat{{\tau}}}_{\mathrm{t}}\)
. | \({\Delta}{\hat{{\tau}}}_{\mathrm{r}}\)
. | \({\hat{{\tau}}}_{\mathrm{f}}\)
. | x̂ o . | αdown . | αup . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM1 | 1 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.32 | -0.08 | 0.2 | -50 | 70 |
PM2 | 1 | 3 | 0.12 | 0.32 | -0.08 | 0.2 | -50 | 50 |
PM3 | 1 | 3 | 0.12 | 0.32 | 0.08 | 0.2 | -50 | 50 |
VM1 | 2 | 6 | 0.24 | 0.32 | -0.08 | 0.2 | -50 | 50 |
VM2 | 2 | 6 | 0.105 | 0.32 | -0.08 | 0.2 | -50 | 50 |
VM3 | 2 | 11 | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0 | 0.2 | -50 | 50 |
VM4 | 2 | 11 | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0.08 | 0.2 | -50 | 50 |
Source 1, Dickinson et al.,1999; Source 2, Sun and Tang,2002. Fig. refers to the figure in the source paper from which the force curves were digitized.
In PM1, PM2, VM1 and VM2, wing rotation is `advanced' relative to stroke reversal. In PM3 and VM4, rotation is `delayed'. In VM3, wing rotation is symmetric about stroke reversal.