This study is an attempt to gain an integrated understanding of the interactions between temperature, locomotion activity and metabolism in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). To our knowledge this study is among the few that have investigated the influence of the seasonal changes in water temperature on swimming performance in fish. Using a Brett-type swim-tunnel respirometer the relationship between oxygen consumption and swimming speed was determined in fish acclimatised to 7, 11, 14, 18, 22, 26 and 30°C. The corresponding maximum swimming speed(Umax), optimal swimming speed (Uopt),active (AMR) and standard (SMR) metabolic rates as well as aerobic metabolic scope (MS) were calculated. Using simple mathematical functions, these parameters were modelled as a function of water temperature and swimming speed. Both SMR and AMR were positively related to water temperature up to 24°C. Above 24°C SMR and AMR levelled off and MS tended to decrease. We found a tight relationship between AMR and Umax and observed that raising the temperature increased AMR and increased swimming ability. However, although fish swam faster at high temperature, the net cost of transport (COTnet) at a given speed was not influence by the elevation of the water temperature. Although Uopt doubled between 7°C and 30°C (from 0.3 to 0.6 m s-1), metabolic rate at Uopt represented a relatively constant fraction of the animal active metabolic rate (40-45%). A proposed model integrates the effects of water temperature on the interaction between metabolism and swimming performance. In particular the controlling effect of temperature on AMR is shown to be the key factor limiting maximal swimming speed of sea bass.
Many fish in natural water bodies are subjected to large diurnal or seasonal changes in temperature. Consequently, these organisms have developed a wide range of regulatory mechanisms aimed at preserving overall performance at a wide range of body temperatures.
The ability to move is a fundamental property of animal life. Many factors,such as predator-prey interaction, reproductive behaviour and habitat selection, are of profound ecological importance and depend heavily on an animal's capacity for movement (Baker,1978). Although rarely proven, intuitive logic would dictate that the ability to swim factors into Darwinian fitness(Arnold, 1983; Nelson, 1989). Despite this intuitive link to fitness, and despite the large number of studies conducted to date, the impact of water temperature on locomotor performance in fish still remains poorly described. This lack of understanding results mainly from the diversity of physical, biochemical, physiological and behavioural processes that are involved, and which interact at various organisational levels. In two reviews (Johnston and Ball,1996; Taylor et al.,1997), a series of missing or incomplete pieces of information that prevent us from making adequate predictions regarding the effects of temperature on swimming performance were identified. These include the linkage between muscle work and swimming speed, the nature of the functional limits to swimming (see also Kieffer,2000), the factors controlling swimming performance, the effect of acclimation versus acclimatisation(Butler et al., 1992), and phenotypic plasticity (see also Johnston and Temple, 2002). Moreover, although generally recognised, the multifaceted environmental influence on fish swimming ability remains insufficiently understood. For instance, Day and Butler compared the swimming ability of brown trout (Salmo trutta) acclimatised to seasonal temperature to that of individuals acclimated to reversed seasonal temperature(Day and Butler, 2005). They demonstrated that in the latter case full thermal compensation does not occur. They suggested that swimming abilities are influenced by seasonal factors other than temperature, possibly photoperiod (see also Kolok, 1991).
Sea bass are active pelagic fish that occupy estuarine marine waters as adults. They capture prey by pursuit, usually as part of a shoal when they are juveniles. In addition, adult sea bass undergo substantial annual migrations between coastal and offshore marine waters. Both juveniles and adults have been observed holding station in strong tidal currents and are subject to predation by marine mammals, pelagic fishes and several types of birds(Pickett and Pawson, 1994). Some degree of swimming performance is undoubtedly critical to the success of individual sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Therefore, understanding the factors that control swimming performance should be important in predicting a sea bass's chances of survival in its natural environment. Management of the sea bass fishery in Europe is currently based on a package of technical measures designed to protect juveniles and to improve recruitment into the adult spawning stock. These measures are based on knowledge of the distribution of the various life history stages, their growth, and interactions with capture fisheries around the coasts of Europe(Pickett and Pawson, 1994). This information is important for understanding the relationship between adult biomass and ensuing recruitment. However, knowledge of biological factors that contribute to the recruitment into the reproducing population could vastly improve management models and should be an important element of any ecosystem approach to fisheries management. In the case of sea bass, the deficiency in basic information is striking, particularly when it comes to defining environmental tolerances and physiological optima. In recent years a progressive northward spread of sea bass has been recorded along the western coasts of Europe; this expansion is believed to be related to the warming of the European Atlantic waters(Quéro, 1998; Quéro et al., 1998; O'Brien et al., 2000; Stebbing et al., 2002). As the northern limits to the ranges of the species extend further, the effect on the fisheries is likely to be important but remains very difficult to predict.
With this deficit of information as a background, the present experiment was designed to investigate the effect of temperature on the relationship between aerobic metabolism and swimming performance in acclimatised European sea bass. In order to improve our ability to predict the effect of water temperature on that relationship, locomotion and associated metabolic performance were examined in seasonally acclimatised individuals. Our objectives were: (1) to establish the link between active metabolic rate and maximum swimming speed, (2) to model the controlling effect of temperature on the cost of swimming and (3) to propose an integrated description of the interactions between temperature, metabolism and swimming performance in sea bass.
Materials and methods
Fish collection and maintenance
Juvenile sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax Linnaeus 1758 of both sexes(mass 147.16±2.68 g; mean ± s.e.m.; range 105-248 g) were obtained from a local hatchery (Ferme Marine des Baleines, Ile de Ré,France). Upon arrival at the laboratory they were transferred into 500 litre indoor tanks supplied with recirculated and filtered natural seawater (water renewal rate: 30-50% per week). Fish were kept under natural photoperiod and temperature conditions and were fed twice a week on commercial dry pellets(2-4% of body mass). Experiments started 2 months after fish arrived in the laboratory. Feeding was discontinued 24 h before any manipulation of the animals and 3-5 days ahead of any oxygen consumption measurement.
with τ a dimensionless factor depending on the tunnel cross-sectional shape (0.8), λ a shape factor for the fish [0.53(length/thickness)], Ao the cross-sectional area of the fish and At the cross-sectional area of the swim chamber.
The level of oxygen saturation in the respirometer was never allowed to fall below 85%.
Experiments took place from December 1999 to June 2001, on fish seasonally acclimatised to the environmental temperature prevailing in their rearing facility. At each experimental temperature (7, 11, 14, 18, 22, 26 and 30°C) 7-10 fish were transferred to a 500 litre tank situated in a thermoregulated room, with a photoperiod matched to the natural seasonal hours of daylight and darkness. The temperature difference between the two rearing facilities never exceeded 0.5°C. After 12-18 days (experimental temperature, salinity 25%-28‰), during which they were fed regularly,animals were sequentially anaesthetised (2-phenoxyethanol; dilution 0.3 ml l-1), weighed, and their length, width and depth measured. Fish were then placed in the respirometer and left undisturbed overnight at a water velocity of 10 cm s-1.
Each experimental run consisted of a 30 min period at each of the designated speeds up to the maximum speed. The speed increment was 10 cm s-1, with the speed raised at a rate of 4 cm s-1min-1. At each speed, fish
Maximum swimming speed
The maximum swimming speed (Umax) that fish were able to attain was determined by direct observation. The criteria that we used to define Umax were similar to those used by Sepulveda and Dickson (Sepulveda and Dickson,2000), i.e. fish generally displayed burst-and-glide swimming mode and
Standard metabolic rate and active metabolic rate
where a, b and c are constants.
where the optimal swimming speed is the speed that minimises that the energy expenditure per unit of travel distance.
Statistical analysis and modelling procedure
Throughout the manuscript, data are presented as mean ± 1 s.e.m. In all statistical analysis, P<0.05 was taken as the fiducial level for significance.
Metabolic rates and maximum swimming speed
Sea bass maximum swimming speed (Umax), active metabolic rate (AMR) and standard metabolic rate (SMR) increased significantly with acclimisation temperature (ANOVA, P<0.0001; Table 1). Over the whole temperature range tested, the calculated Q10 values were 1.25, 1.63 and 1.71 for Umax, AMR and SMR, respectively. When the seven temperature trials were compared, a strong positive relationship between active metabolic rate and maximum swimming speed was observed(Fig. 1).
|T (°C) .||N .||SMR (mmol h−1 kg−1) .||AMR (mmol h−1 kg−1) .||Umax (m s−1) .|
|T (°C) .||N .||SMR (mmol h−1 kg−1) .||AMR (mmol h−1 kg−1) .||Umax (m s−1) .|
T, acclimatisation temperature; Umax, maximum swimming speed; SMR, standard metabolic rate; AMR, active metabolic rate.
Values are means ± s.e.m.; N, number of individuals. In each column, numbers sharing a superscripted letter are statistically similar(a posteriori t-tests; P<0.05).
At each experimental temperature a relationship between oxygen consumption(mmol h-1 kg-1) and swimming speed (cm s-1)was fitted by the least squares using Eqn 4(Fig. 2). The values of the corresponding constants and r2 are reported in Table 2. The effect of acclimatisation temperature on the relationship between swimming speed(U) and cost of transport (COT) was examined using Eqn 6(Fig. 3) using the appropriate values for a, b and c given in Table 2. The optimal swimming speed (Uopt),
|T (°C) .||a .||b .||c .||r2 .||Uopt (cm s-1) .||MO2 at Uopt (mmol h-1kg-1) .||COT at Uopt (J kg-1 km-1) .||COTnet at Uopt (J kg-1km-1) .|
|T (°C) .||a .||b .||c .||r2 .||Uopt (cm s-1) .||MO2 at Uopt (mmol h-1kg-1) .||COT at Uopt (J kg-1 km-1) .||COTnet at Uopt (J kg-1km-1) .|
MO2=a+bUc. T, temperature; Uopt, optimal swimming speed (Eqn 5).
MO2 at Uopt and COT at Uopt were calculated using Eqn 4 and Eqn 6 and parameter values from Table 2. COTnet at Uopt were calculated using Eqn 11.
This model is represented as a solid line on Fig. 4.
The various models and experimental data that describe the interactions between temperature, metabolism and swimming performance are summarised in Fig. 5. Open squares are AMR and SMR ± s.e.m. (Table 1). Thick solid lines represent the consolidated models AMR=fl(T) and SMR=fl(T), which were fitted using the equations reported in Claireaux and Lagardère after combining with the current data set (Claireaux and Lagardère, 1999). Th dotted lines are `isospeed' curves that were drawn using Eqn 10. Isospeeds depict the influence of water temperature on the cost of swimming at a given speed. The point where one given `isospeed' meets the AMR=fl(T) relationship indicates Umax at the considered temperature. Closed triangles are the metabolic rates at Uopt for the considered temperature(Table 2).
To our knowledge the present study is one of the few that have investigated the effect of thermal acclimatisation upon metabolism and swimming performance in fish (e.g. Butler et al.,1992; Taylor et al.,1996; Day and Butler,2005). While investigating the influence of seasonal changes in water temperature we specifically examined the link between active metabolic rate and maximum swimming speed. We then modelled the controlling effect of temperature on the cost of swimming. Finally, we conducted an integrative interpretation of the relationships between temperature, metabolism and swimming performance in sea bass.
There are few published measurements of metabolic rate in European sea bass. Oxygen consumption at increasing swimming speed was measured in 250 g,20°C-acclimated individuals (Herskin and Steffensen, 1998). The relationship established superimposes nicely onto our own results. For instance at U=0.67 m s-1,Herskin and Steffensen report
Because we were interested in linking aerobic swimming and metabolic performances, we chose to examine the maximum swimming speed(Umax; see Materials and methods) rather than the critical swimming speed (Ucrit). Ucrit is generally defined as the speed at which fish are unable to remove themselves from the posterior grid of the swim chamber(Brett, 1964). Consequently,values for swimming performance reported in Table 1 are slightly lower than the critical swimming speeds found using a true Ucritprotocol (Chatelier et al.,2005). Nevertheless they are within the range of values reported for most active teleosts (Beamish,1978; Videler,1993).
It has long been recognised that the swimming performance of fish is influenced by water temperature (Beamish,1978). In many fish species, maximum swimming speed or endurance are reduced at low temperature, increase to a peak at an optimum temperature and then decrease as temperature approaches the upper thermal limit(Randall and Brauner, 1991; Myrick and Cech, 2000; Ojanguren and Braña,2000; Lee et al.,2003). This bell-shaped curve outlines the integrated temperature optima for physiological processes related to swimming and it also prevails in sea bass. Fig. 5 shows that at temperatures above 22-24°C the increase in Umax with temperature tends to level off, suggesting that the optimal temperature for sea bass is being attained. Reasons for the drop-off as temperature departs from optimal are many and are not fully elucidated. There is good evidence to suggest that fish reach their maximum aerobic capacities (AMR) at swimming speeds near Ucrit. This implies that as fish approach maximal swimming, arterial blood is being pumped at the maximum rate by the heart (Farrell, 2002), that arterial blood is fully saturated with oxygen at the gills(Randall and Daxboeck, 1982; Thorarensen et al., 1993; Gallaugher et al., 2001) and that venous blood is maximally depleted of oxygen by the tissues(Farrell and Clutterham,2003). The present investigation does not provide direct evidence to validate this view but the strong relationship that we found between AMR and Ucrit as acclimatisation temperature increased(Fig. 1) suggests that the temperature-related changes in cardioresrespiratory performance support the seasonal changes in maximum swimming performance. Along the same lines,aerobic metabolic scope and swimming performance in rainbow trout were positively related to in vivo (forced swimming test) or in vitro (in situ perfused heart preparations) measurements of maximum cardiac pumping capacity(Claireaux et al., 2005). Conversely, oxygen supply to the red muscle was not a limiting factor at exhaustion in trout (McKenzie et al.,2004) and Ucrit in chinook salmon is virtually independent of functional haemoglobin concentration until [Hb] is less than 50% of control level (Brauner et al.,1993). Moreover, Day and Butler convincingly demonstrated that brown trout acclimated to reversed seasonal temperature displayed reduced swimming ability (Ucrit)(Day and Butler, 2005),suggesting that more factors than just temperature determined the ability of fish to swim maximally.
It has been shown that temperature has a significant effect on the maximum velocity of shortening of muscle as well as on the maximum power production,while having relatively little effect on sarcomere length excursions and tail beat frequency (Rome, 1990; Rome et al., 1992). On that basis, questions have been raised concerning the mechanisms that allow fish to produce the same movement at different temperatures despite the marked susceptibility of muscle power-generating capacity to thermal conditions. Electromyography studies have shown that during a standardised swim test, only red muscle is recruited at low speed and that anaerobically fuelled, white muscle fibers are recruited at high speed. These experiments also revealed that the recruitment order of the different fibers does not change with temperature but that white muscle fibers are recruited at much lower speed in cold water (Rome et al.,1984). Consequently, it is the compression of the speed range over which motor units are recruited, and the early recruitment of anaerobic fibers, that are believed to explain the reduction in maximal sustainable swimming speed in cold conditions. Our own experimental results clearly support this view. For instance Fig. 4 shows that while maximum swimming speed increases with acclimatisation temperature, the cost of swimming at a given submaximal swimming speed does not change. The lack of thermal effect on COTnet, together with the relatively tight relationship between AMR and Umax discussed above, suggest that changes in swimming capacity largely result from variations in energy fluxes and support metabolism, hence in scope for activity, rather than in properties of muscle function per se (Rome,1990; Taylor et al.,1996). However, there are some examples in the literature where swimming cost was shown to be influenced by water temperature (reviewed by Johnston and Temple, 2002). For instance, the energetic costs of swimming at a given speed increased with temperature in the chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus)(Dickson et al., 2002). Many reasons can be put forward to explain these inter-species differences, among which species-specific temperature acclimation responses or diversity in molecular mechanisms (Johnston and Temple,2002). These aspects have not been properly addressed in the literature but their elucidation is a promising avenue for future research.
The current work provides an integrated view of the influence of water temperature on sea bass aerobic swimming performance. However, to convincingly transfer this knowledge into an ecological context, three issues require further investigation. The first concerns the relationship between optimal and spontaneous swimming speeds. Throughout the literature the use of Uopt during routine swimming by wild fish is often assumed but this has not been satisfactorily demonstrated, essentially due to technical limitations (Webber et al.,2001a; Webber et al.,2001b). This missing piece of information remains an obstacle to establishing a reliable field energy budget in fish.
The second issue relates to the fact that although the study of locomotion in fish has a long history, little effort has been allocated into investigating the ecological relevance of inter-individual diversity in swimming performance (Kolok,1999; Plaut, 2001; Nelson and Claireaux, 2005). The basic patterns revealed by Fig. 5 are based on an `average fish' and therefore do not consider inter-individual variability nor phenotypic plasticity. Identifying the potential sources and determinants of such variation is beyond the scope of this paper, but it clearly is the next step in linking locomotor performance to distribution, abundance or fitness of sea bass. In this regard, dietary studies have shown interesting features, including the influence of tissue fatty acid profile on a number of performance traits including cardiorespiratory and swimming performance(McKenzie et al., 1998; McKenzie et al., 2000; McKenzie, 2001; Chatelier et al., 2006).
Finally, swim tests and particularly Ucrit tests have been used to investigate the relationships between swimming speed and cardiorespiratory variables such as oxygen demand, cardiac and respiratory frequencies, blood gas tensions and cardiac output. However, various authors have questioned the adequacy of a swim-tunnel tests in replicating natural swimming conditions and their energetic implications(Tang and Boisclair, 1995; Plaut, 2001; Nelson et al., 2002). In this regard, Peake and Farrell recently obtained clear evidence for the interference imposed by the size of swim tunnel devices on gait transition(Peake and Farrell, 2004). Energetically speaking, the consequences of this interference remain to be established, but linking the ecological function of swimming and its measure in the laboratory certainly requires that this question be resolved(Swanson et al., 1998; Irschick and Garland,2001).
active metabolic rate
cross-sectional area of the fish
cross-sectional area of the swim chamber
cost of transport
decrease in water oxygen content per unit time
standard metabolic rate
maximum swimming speed
optimal swimming speed
effective water velocity
volume of the respirometer minus the volume of the fish
average water velocity
fractional error in VT due to blockage
shape factor for the fish [0.53(length/thickness)]
dimensionless factor depending on the tunnel cross-sectional shape
The authors are grateful to the staff of the CREMA for their valuable technical assistance. Data analysis for this study was conducted at the Friday Harbour Laboratories, San Juan Island (University of Washington) as part of the 2002 summer course `Kinematics, Ecomorphology, Behaviour and Environmental Physiology of Swimming in Fish' (Instructors: P. Domenici, G. Claireaux and J. F. Steffensen). Authors acknowledge the contribution of M. Cannas, Z. Dalla Valle, R. Levine, M. MacNutt, G. Martinez, A. Paglianti, M. Petersen, R. Rivas-Diaz, J. Schaefer, E. Standen, and N. Zorich. We would also like to thank J. A. Nelson and D. J. McKenzie for their review and comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.