Laboratory of Biochemical Genetics, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

The topographic map of cell position in the avian retina is conserved and inverted when retinal ganglion neurons synapse with neurons in the optic tectum. Developmental mechanisms based on molecular gradients that specify positional information and pattern formation have been postulated in the establishment of these topographic maps of cells in retina and optic tectum. Two cell surface proteins in retina, TOPDV and TOPAP, are distributed in dorsoventral and anteroposterior topographic gradients, respectively. Corresponding gradients of TOP molecules present in the tectum are inverted with respect to the retinal gradients. These orthogonal gradients of TOPDV and TOPAP molecules provide a possible Cartesian coordinate system for designation of cell position at all points in the retinotectal map.

Development and function of the nervous system involves the formation of a complex network of cellular organization. Highly stereotyped patterns of synaptic connections are formed between diverse classes of neurons in various and distant locations in the nervous system. In the retinotectal system of lower vertebrates, for example, the topographic order of retinal cells is conserved when retinal ganglion cells project to the optic tectum and other regions of the brain. Attardi and Sperry (1963), using the goldfish, demonstrated that after optic nerve transection regenerating axons from dorsal retina project to ventral tectum and those from ventral retina project to dorsal tectum (Fig. 1A). Posterior retina grows to anterior tectum and anterior retina to posterior tectum (Fig. IB). Similar topography is present in the avian visual system (DeLong and Coulombre, 1965). Resolution of the topographic map in greater detail, determined by measuring electrophysiological responses of tectal cells to stimulation of discrete retinal fields, revealed a continuous point-to-point correspondence between cells of the retina and cells of the tectum (Fig. 1C; for a review, see Fraser and Hunt, 1980). The intricate specificity of synapses in the continuum map develops in a stereotyped pattern. However, the map is flexible to a degree. The retinal map will compress or expand to fill the available synaptic field of tectum after ablation of part of the retina or tectum, yet maintain the topographic order of the map (Gaze et al. 1963; Gaze and Sharma, 1970; Yoon, 1971; Chung and Cooke, 1975; Schmidt et al. 1978). The orderly retinotectal projection apparently relies, in part, on the ability of retinal axons to read tectal cues. In the developing chick retina, misrouted ganglion cell axons, disrupted in the retina and optic nerve, can reorient on the tectal surface and project to the correct target site (Fig. ID; Thanos et al. 1984). Some misrouted growth cones migrate to the appropriate anterior-posterior tectal longitude, make a 90° turn and project to the correct position along the dorsoventral axis of the tectum.

Fig. 1.

Topographic projection of retinal ganglion cell axons to the optic tectum in lower vertebrates. (A) Dorsal retinal neurons innervate ventral tectum and ventral retina innervates dorsal tectum. (B) Anterior retina projects to posterior tectum and posterior retina projects to anterior tectum. (A, B after Attardi and Sperry, 1963; DeLong and Coulombre, 1965). (C) Continuous point-to-point topographic map of retinal projection onto tectum demonstrated by electrophysiological data (after Gaze et al. 1963; Gaze and Sharma, 1970; Yoon, 1971; Chung and Cooke, 1975; Schmidt et al. 1978). (D) Ganglion cell axons misrouted after disruption in retina and optic nerve can reorient on the tectum and project to the correct target site (after Thanos et al. 1984). D, dorsal; V, ventral; A, anterior (nasal); P, posterior (temporal/caudal).

Fig. 1.

Topographic projection of retinal ganglion cell axons to the optic tectum in lower vertebrates. (A) Dorsal retinal neurons innervate ventral tectum and ventral retina innervates dorsal tectum. (B) Anterior retina projects to posterior tectum and posterior retina projects to anterior tectum. (A, B after Attardi and Sperry, 1963; DeLong and Coulombre, 1965). (C) Continuous point-to-point topographic map of retinal projection onto tectum demonstrated by electrophysiological data (after Gaze et al. 1963; Gaze and Sharma, 1970; Yoon, 1971; Chung and Cooke, 1975; Schmidt et al. 1978). (D) Ganglion cell axons misrouted after disruption in retina and optic nerve can reorient on the tectum and project to the correct target site (after Thanos et al. 1984). D, dorsal; V, ventral; A, anterior (nasal); P, posterior (temporal/caudal).

Developmental mechanisms involved in axonal guidance that result in synaptic specificity are not fully understood. Molecular gradients have been proposed as a mechanism for encoding cell positional information and establishing pattern in the embryo (Boveri, 1901; Dalcq and Pasteels, 1937; Child, 1941; Sperry, 1963; Grierer and Meinhardt, 1972; Fraser and Hunt, 1980; Whitelaw and Cowan, 1982; Trisler, 1982). Topographically distributed molecules have been reported in retina and optic tectum (Trisler et al. 1981; Constantine-Paton et al. 1986; Rabacchi and Drager, 1987; Trisler and Collins, 1987; Müller et al. 1990).

Topographically graded molecules in retina were detected with monoclonal antibodies generated by the fusion of spleen cells from mice immunized with a small portion of dorsal or posterior retina to P3X63Ag8 mouse myeloma cells (Fig. 2). One antibody to a cell surface molecule bound more abundantly to cells from dorsal retina than to cells from the remainder of the retina. A second antibody bound preferentially to cells of posterior retina. These molecules, termed TOP for toponymic (i.e. a marker of position), are present throughout the retina but are distributed in topographic gradients (Fig. 3). TOPDV is graded dorsoventrally and TOPAP is graded anteroposteriorly. Bilaterally symmetrical gradients of TOP molecules are present in the retinas of both right and left eyes.

Fig. 2.

Strategy for detecting topographically distributed retinal antigens. Mice were immunized with dorsal or posterior retina segments from E14 chicken (Gallus gallus) embryos. Hybridomas were produced with spleen cells from the hyperimmune mice and monoclonal antibodies were screened for preferential binding to dorsal or posterior retinal cells over cells from the remainder of retina. D, V, A and P correspond to dorsal, ventral, anterior and posterior, respectively. The choroid fissure shown extending from the ventral margin to central retina was used as a landmark for dissection (after Trisler et al. 1981).

Fig. 2.

Strategy for detecting topographically distributed retinal antigens. Mice were immunized with dorsal or posterior retina segments from E14 chicken (Gallus gallus) embryos. Hybridomas were produced with spleen cells from the hyperimmune mice and monoclonal antibodies were screened for preferential binding to dorsal or posterior retinal cells over cells from the remainder of retina. D, V, A and P correspond to dorsal, ventral, anterior and posterior, respectively. The choroid fissure shown extending from the ventral margin to central retina was used as a landmark for dissection (after Trisler et al. 1981).

Fig. 3.

Topographic gradients of (A) TOPDV (•) and (B) TOPAP (▀) molecules in E14 chick retina. Molecular gradients detected with mouse monoclonal anti-TOPDV and anti-TOPAP antibodies. Values shown are picomoles of [125I]-F(ab′)2 fragment of rabbit IgG directed against mouse IgG specifically bound to retinal cells exposed to anti-TOP antibody per milligram of retina protein (A after Trisler et al. 1981).

Fig. 3.

Topographic gradients of (A) TOPDV (•) and (B) TOPAP (▀) molecules in E14 chick retina. Molecular gradients detected with mouse monoclonal anti-TOPDV and anti-TOPAP antibodies. Values shown are picomoles of [125I]-F(ab′)2 fragment of rabbit IgG directed against mouse IgG specifically bound to retinal cells exposed to anti-TOP antibody per milligram of retina protein (A after Trisler et al. 1981).

A 35-fold gradient of TOPDV was found extending from the dorsal to the ventral. margins of the retina aligned parallel to the long axis of the choroid fissure (Fig. 4), and a 16-fold gradient of TOPAP is present from the anterior retinal margin to the posterior margin perpendicular to TOPDV. The concentration of TOP molecules detected varied continuously and logarithmically with the logarithm of distance along the circumference of retina.

Fig. 4.

Geometry of (A) TOPDV and (B) TOPAP gradients in E14 retina. TOP concentrations were determined from strips of retina cut along the axes of the respective gradients.

Fig. 4.

Geometry of (A) TOPDV and (B) TOPAP gradients in E14 retina. TOP concentrations were determined from strips of retina cut along the axes of the respective gradients.

Indirect immunofluorescence of anti-TOPDV antibody binding to cells in tissue sections taken along the dorsoventral axis of retina of E5 embryos revealed TOPDV was most abundant in dorsal retina, intermediate in middle, and least abundant in ventral retina (Fig. 5). No obvious heterogeneity was observed in the cell population from each location. Most or all cells across the thickness of retina from the vitreal surface to the pigmented epithelium stained. Visual scanning of fluorescently stained transverse sections of whole retina showed that TOPDV was continuously graded. This indicates that the dorsoventral gradient is due to differences in the amount of TOPDV per cell rather than to differences in the number of cells expressing TOPDV. The ring fluorescence pattern around each cell is consistent with the fact that TOPDV is a cell surface molecule. In older embryos and in adult retina, TOPDV is most abundant in the synaptic layers and in the ganglion cell axon layer (Fig. 5G).

Fig. 5.

Cellular distribution of TOP molecules. Indirect immunofluorescence of anti-TOPDV and anti-TOPAP binding to cells in 10 μm thick sections of retina and optic tectum. (A,B,C) Anti-TOPDV binding to dorsal, middle and ventral E5 retina, respectively; (D,E,F) anti-TOPDV binding to dorsal, middle and ventral E5 optic tectum, respectively; (G) anti-TOPDV in E18 dorsal retina (r, photoreceptor layer; os, outer synaptic layer; in, inner nuclear layer; is, inner synaptic layer; g, ganglion cell layer; a, ganglion cell axon layer); (H) P3X63Ag8 myeloma antibody binding to E18 retina; (I,J,K) anti-TOPAp binding to posterior, middle and anterior E5 retina, respectively (inset in K is an autoradiogram of anti-TOPAP binding to cells in a section along the equatorial meridian of E8 retina); (L,M,N) anti-TOPAP binding to posterior, middle and anterior tectum, respectively. Scale bar, 12μm A-F; 25 μm, G and H; 35 μm, I-M; 6.5 mm, inset).

Fig. 5.

Cellular distribution of TOP molecules. Indirect immunofluorescence of anti-TOPDV and anti-TOPAP binding to cells in 10 μm thick sections of retina and optic tectum. (A,B,C) Anti-TOPDV binding to dorsal, middle and ventral E5 retina, respectively; (D,E,F) anti-TOPDV binding to dorsal, middle and ventral E5 optic tectum, respectively; (G) anti-TOPDV in E18 dorsal retina (r, photoreceptor layer; os, outer synaptic layer; in, inner nuclear layer; is, inner synaptic layer; g, ganglion cell layer; a, ganglion cell axon layer); (H) P3X63Ag8 myeloma antibody binding to E18 retina; (I,J,K) anti-TOPAp binding to posterior, middle and anterior E5 retina, respectively (inset in K is an autoradiogram of anti-TOPAP binding to cells in a section along the equatorial meridian of E8 retina); (L,M,N) anti-TOPAP binding to posterior, middle and anterior tectum, respectively. Scale bar, 12μm A-F; 25 μm, G and H; 35 μm, I-M; 6.5 mm, inset).

Similarly, TOPAP is distributed in a graded pattern along the anteroposterior axis (Fig. 5). The ring fluorescence of cells from anterior retina was weakest, that of middle cells was intermediate and that of cells from posterior retina exhibited the greatest binding of anti-TOPAP in E5 embryos. Autoradiography of anti-TOPAP binding along the anterior-posterior equatorial meridian of the entire E8 retina revealed the TOPAP gradient. Since TOPDV and TOPAP molecules are graded on the basis of number of molecules per cell, TOPDV can be used to identify cell position along the dorsoventral axis, while TOPAP identified cell position along the anteroposterior axis of retina.

Gradients of TOP molecules were present in retina at all developmental ages tested from E4 to E18 and in hatchling chicks (Fig. 6). The orientation of the gradients remained constant throughout development; however, the magnitude of the TOPDV gradient increased 10 times from a threefold gradient at E4 to a 35-fold gradient at E12. The TOPAP gradient increased fivefold from E5 to E18. Thus, the TOP gradients are present early during blast cell proliferation and persist throughout development when both neurogenesis and gliogenesis occur and tissue organization is established.

Fig. 6.

TOP antigen gradients in chick retina as a function of developmental age. (A) TOPDV; (B) TOPAP in (▾), E4; (◯), E5; (•), E8; (□), E10; (▀), E12; (A), E14; (A), E18 retinas.

Fig. 6.

TOP antigen gradients in chick retina as a function of developmental age. (A) TOPDV; (B) TOPAP in (▾), E4; (◯), E5; (•), E8; (□), E10; (▀), E12; (A), E14; (A), E18 retinas.

Both TOPDV and TOPAP are cell surface proteins. TOPDv has an apparent relative molecular mass of 47×103 (Moskal et al. 1986) and TOPAP of 40×103. Topographic differences in TOPAP distribution were found in immunoblots of retina cell proteins resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Approximately 16-fold more TOPAP was detected in cells from the posterior margin of retina than from the anterior margin (Fig. 7). Analogously, more TOPAP was present in the posterior half-retina than in the anterior half-retina. These results suggest that the graded nature of TOPAP demonstrated by radioimmuno-binding assay and by indirect immunofluorescence reflects the distribution of the antigen itself and not that of a masking molecule or of antigen accessibility. However, a gradient of post-translational modification of evenly distributed TOPAP molecules has not been ruled out.

Fig. 7.

Demonstration of TOPAP topographic distribution in retina and determination of TOPAP relative molecular masses by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblot analysis. (A) Lanes 1 and 11, relative molecular mass standards; lanes 2–10, serial twofold dilutions of 25μg of E8 protein from the anterior retinal margin; lanes 12–20, serial twofold dilutions of 25μg of E8 protein from the posterior retinal margin; (B) detail of autoradiogram of anti-TOPAp binding to serial dilutions of 25 μg of retina protein from anterior half-retina (lanes 2–10) and posterior half-retina (lanes 12–20).

Fig. 7.

Demonstration of TOPAP topographic distribution in retina and determination of TOPAP relative molecular masses by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblot analysis. (A) Lanes 1 and 11, relative molecular mass standards; lanes 2–10, serial twofold dilutions of 25μg of E8 protein from the anterior retinal margin; lanes 12–20, serial twofold dilutions of 25μg of E8 protein from the posterior retinal margin; (B) detail of autoradiogram of anti-TOPAp binding to serial dilutions of 25 μg of retina protein from anterior half-retina (lanes 2–10) and posterior half-retina (lanes 12–20).

TOPDV and TOPAP molecules were also detected in the optic nerve (Fig. 8). Their distribution matched the organization of ganglion cell axons in the nerve. Axons from peripheral dorsal retina cells of E12 embryos were shown by fluorescent dye-tracing to be present in dorsal nerve. Indirect immunofluorescence revealed a greater abundance of TOPDV in dorsal nerve than in ventral nerve. Ganglion cell axons from posterior retina were in anterior nerve, as were higher levels of TOPAP. Although the distribution of TOP molecules reiterates the organization of ganglion cell axons in the nerve, the question of whether TOP molecules in the nerve are associated with axons, with glia or with both is not resolved. In E12 embryos, at the age when retinal axons have covered the tectal surface, TOPAp was most abundant on the anterior medial portion of tectum (Fig. 8) where posterior retinal axons project (DeLong and Coulombre, 1965).

Fig. 8.

TOP molecules in optic nerve and optic tectum. (A,B) Anterogradely transported rhodamine isothiocyanate from dorsal and posterior retina in E12 optic nerve from within 1 mm of the nerve head, respectively; (C,D) image-enhanced video micrographs of TOPDV and TOPAP binding in E12 optic nerve, respectively; (E) dorsal view of a whole mount of E12 optic tectal lobes stained with anti-TOPAP antibody and horseradish-peroxidase-labeled rabbit antibody to mouse IgG.

Fig. 8.

TOP molecules in optic nerve and optic tectum. (A,B) Anterogradely transported rhodamine isothiocyanate from dorsal and posterior retina in E12 optic nerve from within 1 mm of the nerve head, respectively; (C,D) image-enhanced video micrographs of TOPDV and TOPAP binding in E12 optic nerve, respectively; (E) dorsal view of a whole mount of E12 optic tectal lobes stained with anti-TOPAP antibody and horseradish-peroxidase-labeled rabbit antibody to mouse IgG.

TOP molecules are present on optic tectum cells as well as in retina (Trisler and Collins, 1987). They are distributed in gradients in E5 embryos 1 day before ganglion cell axons arrive at the tectum (Fig. 9). TOPDV and TOPAP gradients in tectum are inverted with respect to the retinal gradients. TOPDV is 10-fold higher in ventral than in dorsal tectum and TOPAP is eightfold higher in anterior than in posterior tectum. The quantities of TOPDV and TOPAP detected per cell by indirect immunofluorescence varied continuously along the axes of the tectal gradients (Fig. 5). Little or no heterogeneity of TOPDV or TOPAP expression was found among cells from ventricular to pial surfaces at a given position along the respective gradients. Thus, as in retina, TOP molecules can be used to mark cell position in tectum.

Fig. 9.

Topographic gradients of (A) TOPDV and (B) TOPAP in E5 optic tectum.

Fig. 9.

Topographic gradients of (A) TOPDV and (B) TOPAP in E5 optic tectum.

The orthogonal monotonic gradients of TOPDV and TOPAP topographic molecules constitute a possible Cartesian coordinate system that can be used to designate cell position at all points in the plane of the retina and optic tectum (Fig. 10). The presence of corresponding TOP gradients in retina and tectum suggests a possible role for the molecules in orienting the dorsoventral and anteroposterior axes of the retinal projection onto the tectum.

Fig. 10.

Schematic diagram of the corresponding orthogonal gradients of TOPDV and TOPDV in retina and optic tectum. D, dorsal; V, ventral; A, anterior (nasal); P, posterior (temporal/caudal).

Fig. 10.

Schematic diagram of the corresponding orthogonal gradients of TOPDV and TOPDV in retina and optic tectum. D, dorsal; V, ventral; A, anterior (nasal); P, posterior (temporal/caudal).

The retina grows by accretion of rings of cells in the proliferative zone at the peripheral margin (Coulombre, 1955; Kahn, 1974). Expression of the TOP gradient during retinal growth was examined by comparison of the amount of TOPDV in the proliferative zone at the poles of the gradient in E4-E10 retinas with the amount of TOPDV at the corresponding distances along the gradient axis in E12 retina (Fig. 11). The cells in the proliferative zone at the dorsal margin of retina expressed progressively more TOPDV with retinal growth, while those in the proliferative zone at the ventral margin expressed progressively less TOPDV. thereby increasing the magnitude of the gradient (Trisler, 1987). There was close agreement in the amount of TOPDV detected on cells at a given distance along the gradient axis from the fundus, the oldest portion of the retina, throughout the developmental period tested. Thus, each position along the axis has a constant. TOPDV value through these developmental ages.

Fig. 11.

Increase in TOPDV gradient with retinal growth. (A) TOPDV detected at the poles of the gradient of E4-E10 retinas and along the axis of the gradient of E12 retina. (B) TOPDV values at these positions for each age as a function of distance along the axis of the gradient in E12 retina. Circumferential distances from dorsal to ventral poles for each age are shown: ◯, E4; △, E6; □, E8; ▽, E10; •, E12 (after Trisler, 1987).

Fig. 11.

Increase in TOPDV gradient with retinal growth. (A) TOPDV detected at the poles of the gradient of E4-E10 retinas and along the axis of the gradient of E12 retina. (B) TOPDV values at these positions for each age as a function of distance along the axis of the gradient in E12 retina. Circumferential distances from dorsal to ventral poles for each age are shown: ◯, E4; △, E6; □, E8; ▽, E10; •, E12 (after Trisler, 1987).

The level of TOPDV expressed in the progeny of cells dividing at various angles to the axis of the antigen gradient was determined by comparing TOPDV expression in cells of the proliferative zone of E4 and E12 retinas at different positions around the peripheral margin (Fig. 12). Both the magnitude and the sign of change in TOPDV expression during development varied depending on the position of the parental cells. Progeny cells in dorsal retina expressed more TOPDV than parental cells while those in ventral retina expressed less. The greatest magnitude of change in expression was along the axis of the gradient (0°). Little or no change in TOPDV expression occurred in cells with retinal growth along the perpendicular axis (90°). Intermediate rates of change in TOPDV expression were found during cell division at 45° to the gradient axis.

Fig. 12.

Comparison of TOPDV expression in parental cells (E4) and progeny cells (E12) during embryonic development as a function of the angle of growth from the axis of the TOPDV gradient in retina. (A) TOPDV detected at the peripheral margins of E4 and E12 retina along the axis (0°) and at 45° and 90 to the axis. (B) Change of TOPDV expression at each angle from E4 to E12 retinal growth (after Trisler, 1987).

Fig. 12.

Comparison of TOPDV expression in parental cells (E4) and progeny cells (E12) during embryonic development as a function of the angle of growth from the axis of the TOPDV gradient in retina. (A) TOPDV detected at the peripheral margins of E4 and E12 retina along the axis (0°) and at 45° and 90 to the axis. (B) Change of TOPDV expression at each angle from E4 to E12 retinal growth (after Trisler, 1987).

Ablation of parental cells in the proliferative zone at the dorsal and ventral poles of the gradient in embryos 60 h after fertilization altered the level of TOPDV expression in dorsal and ventral retina later in development (Fig. 13). Progeny cells that replaced the ablated dorsal region expressed 60% less TOPDV than normal in E16 retina. After ventral ablation, cells in ventral retina expressed 300 % more TOPDV.These values are similar to that expected for the progeny of parental cells from regions neighboring the ablated portion. This suggests that by 60 h of development the level of TOPDV expressed by the retina cells and their progeny is already determined.

Fig. 13.

TOPDV gradients in E16 retinas after ablation of parental cells at the dorsal or ventral poles of the gradient in the cell proliferative marginal zone 60 h after fertilization. (A) TOPDV in ◯, normal retina; ▴, retina after dorsal pole ablation; ▀, retina after ventral pole ablation. (B) Percentage change of TOPDV expression for each region of retina after ablation.

Fig. 13.

TOPDV gradients in E16 retinas after ablation of parental cells at the dorsal or ventral poles of the gradient in the cell proliferative marginal zone 60 h after fertilization. (A) TOPDV in ◯, normal retina; ▴, retina after dorsal pole ablation; ▀, retina after ventral pole ablation. (B) Percentage change of TOPDV expression for each region of retina after ablation.

The role of molecular markers of cell position in the development of the nervous system was examined using a monoclonal antibody to TOPDV (Trisler, 1983; Trisler et al. 1986). Antibodies provide a means of blocking molecular function (Levi-Montalcini and Booker, 1960; Crawford et al. 1982; Schwartz and Spirma, 1982; Warner et al. 1984). Several groups have demonstrated effects of antibodies against nervous system molecules on growth cone behavior, neurite outgrowth and tissue organization in vivo and in vitro. Antibodies against chicken cognin and N-CAM inhibit cell-cell adhesion (Hausman and Moscona, 1979; Thiery et al. 1977, respectively) and anti-N-CAM disrupts axonal fasciculation (Thanos et al. 1984; Fraser et al. 1984). Antibody T61/3/12 blocks neurite outgrowth of chick retina cells in vitro (Henke-Fahle and Bonhoeffer, 1983), whereas antibody to Thy-1 stimulates neurite outgrowth of rat retinal ganglion cells in vitro (Leifer et al. 1984). Antibody LI inhibits granular cell migration in rat cerebellar explants (Lindner et al. 1983). Our objectives were to determine the accessibility of TOPDV to antibody in the in vivo retina, to determine the persistence of antibody in retina after injection into the embryo, and to identify changes in the development of retina continuously exposed to anti-TOPDV antibody.

Antibody to TOPDV injected into the amniotic cavity of in ovo chick embryos 2–4 days after fertilization was detected on retina cells 1 day after injection (Fig. 14). The concentration of [Anti-TOPDV TOPDV] complexes (Ab-TOPDV) detected was higher in dorsal retina than in ventral retina. Anti-TOPDv antibody was injected intraocularly into the vitreal space of E7-E19 eyes. A dorsal to ventral gradient of Ab-TOPDV complexes of the same magnitude and orientation detected by in vitro binding studies was present 24 h after intraocular injection of antibody.

Fig. 14.

Anti-TOPDV distribution in retina after in ovo injection. (A) Anti-TOPDV in E3 retina 1 day after injection of antibody into the amniotic cavity. (B) Anti-TOPDV in E12 retina 1 day after intraocular injection of antibody (after Trisler et al. 1986).

Fig. 14.

Anti-TOPDV distribution in retina after in ovo injection. (A) Anti-TOPDV in E3 retina 1 day after injection of antibody into the amniotic cavity. (B) Anti-TOPDV in E12 retina 1 day after intraocular injection of antibody (after Trisler et al. 1986).

A gradient of Ab-TOPDV complexes in retina persisted for 4 days after intraocular injection of mouse ascites fluid containing anti-TOPDV antibody (Fig. 15). The Ab-TOPDV gradient was maintained for 10 days when hybridoma cells, that synthesize anti-TOPDV antibody, were injected. The hybridoma cells provide a continuous source of antibody for long-term maintenance of Ab-TOPDV complexes in the retina. The decrease in Ab-TOPDV complexes in retina after E18 represents a loss in accessibility of TOPDV to intraocular antibody, perhaps due to developmental changes in permeability of the inner limiting membrane of the retina.

Fig. 15.

Duration of antibody to TOPDV gradient in retina after intraocular injection of (A) mouse ascites fluid containing anti-TOPDV antibody and (B) hybridoma cells producing anti-TOPDV antibody. ◯ and • section a of retina; △ and ▴, section b; ▴ and ▀ section c; ▽ and ▾, section d (after Trisler et al. 1986).

Fig. 15.

Duration of antibody to TOPDV gradient in retina after intraocular injection of (A) mouse ascites fluid containing anti-TOPDV antibody and (B) hybridoma cells producing anti-TOPDV antibody. ◯ and • section a of retina; △ and ▴, section b; ▴ and ▀ section c; ▽ and ▾, section d (after Trisler et al. 1986).

Two aspects of the process of synapse formation -the disappearance of growth Cones and the appearance of synapses -were measured in retina from embryos exposed to anti-TOPDV antibody. Antibody was injected into eyes of E11 embryos at the time neuron process layers are forming and 2 days before the first structurally identifiable synapses appear (Sheffield and Fishman, 1970; Hughes and LaVelle, 1974; Daniels and Vogel, 1980). For the electron microscopic analysis of injected retinas, growth cones were defined as bodies containing large, irregular membrane cisternae or vesicles (Del Cerro and Snider, 1968; Kawana et al. 1971). These bodies were larger in section than most neurites and were sometimes seen in continuity with neurites and filopodia. Anti-TOPDV antibody from the injected hybridoma source reached maximal binding in the retina 4 days after injection (E15 embryos). At this time, retinal development appeared normal. However, with continued exposure to anti-TOPDV antibody retinal development was altered. The normal progressive loss of growth cones during development was delayed in retinas containing Ab-TOPDV complexes and synapse formation was inhibited (Fig. 16). The inhibition of synapse formation was not restricted to any particular cell type. Both conventional synapses and bipolar cell ribbon synapses were present in reduced numbers from 5 to 7 days after injection of anti-TOP antibody. Synapse formation appeared to be interrupted across the entire inner synaptic layer in both dorsal and ventral retina. Our working hypothesis is that TOPDV molecules mark cell position in the retina and that, in the presence of Ab-TOPDV complexes, growing neurites fail to detect the TOPDV gradient. This could result in the persistence of growth cones and the delay in synaptogenesis. Synapses eventually form after exposure to anti-TOP antibody. It is not known whether these synapses are positionally correct.

Fig. 16.

Time course of synapse formation in the inner synaptic layer of retina after intraocular injection of hybridoma cells producing anti-TOPDV antibody. (A) Growth cone and (B) synapse density as a function of developmental age after exposure to anti-TOPDV (• and ▀ respectively) and exposure to no antibody and to control antibodies P3X63Ag8 and 57D8 (◯ and □, respectively) (after Trisler et al. 1986).

Fig. 16.

Time course of synapse formation in the inner synaptic layer of retina after intraocular injection of hybridoma cells producing anti-TOPDV antibody. (A) Growth cone and (B) synapse density as a function of developmental age after exposure to anti-TOPDV (• and ▀ respectively) and exposure to no antibody and to control antibodies P3X63Ag8 and 57D8 (◯ and □, respectively) (after Trisler et al. 1986).

The topographic map of cell position in retina is conserved and inverted when retinal axons project to and synapse with neurons of the optic tectum. Developmental mechanisms based on molecular gradients that specify positional information and pattern formation have been postulated in the establishment of the topographic map of cells in avian retina and optic tectum. Orthogonal gradients of toponymic (TOP) cell membrane molecules are present in the retina and optic tectum. TOPDV molecules are distributed dorsoventrally and TOPAP molecules are graded anteroposteriorly. The polarities of the gradients are inverted in tectum with respect to retina. TOPDV is most abundant in dorsal retina and ventral tectum and TOPAP is most abundant in posterior retina and anterior tectum. The quantities of TOPDV and TOPAP detected per cell vary continuously along the axis of the respective gradient. Thus, TOP molecules can be used to identify cell position along the dorsoventral and anteroposterior axes of the developing retina and optic tectum.

The orthogonal monotonic gradients of TOPDV and TOPAP molecules constitute a possible Cartesian coordinate system that can be used to identify cell position in the topographic map of retina and optic tectum. Synapse formation in retina was inhibited in the presence of anti-TOPDV antibody. This suggests that TOPDV may be involved in the recognition of cell position that is required for normal synapse formation. The inverted configuration of the gradients in retina and tectum corresponds to the inverted topographic map of cell position in the retinotectal projection. Thus, TOP molecules may be involved in orienting the retinotectal map.

Attardi
,
D. G.
and
Sperry
,
R. W.
(
1963
).
Preferential selection of central pathways by regenerating optic fibers
.
Exptl Neurol
.
7
,
46
64
.
Boveri
,
T.
(
1901
).
Ober die Polaritat des Seeigeleies
.
Eisverb. Phys. Med. Ges. (Wurzburg)
34
,
145
175
.
Child
,
C. M.
(
1941
).
Patterns and Problems of Development
.
Chicago
:
University of Chicago Press
.
Chung
,
S. H.
and
Cooke
,
J.
(
1975
).
Polarity of structure and ordered nerve connections in the developing amphibian brain
.
Nature
258
,
126
132
.
Constantine-Paton
,
M.
,
Blum
,
A. S.
,
Mendez-Otero
,
R.
and
Barnstable
,
C. J.
(
1986
).
A cell surface molecule distributed in a dorso-ventral gradient in the perinatal rat retina
.
Nature
324
,
459
462
.
Coulombre
,
A. S.
(
1955
).
Correlations of structural and biochemical changes in the developing retina of the chick
.
Am. J. Anat
.
96
,
153
184
.
Crawford
,
G.
,
Slemmon
,
J. R.
and
Salvaterra
,
P. M.
(
1982
).
Monoclonal antibodies selective for Drosophila melanogaster choline acetlytransferase
.
J. biol. Chem
.
257
,
3853
3856
.
Dalcq
,
A.
and
Pasteels
,
J.
(
1938
).
Potentiel morphogénétique régulation et ‘axial gradients’ de Child
.
Bull. Acad. r. Med. Belg
.
3
,
261
308
.
Daniels
,
M. P.
and
Vogel
,
Z.
(
1970
).
Localization of a-bungarotoxin binding sites in synapses of developing chick retina
.
Brain Res
.
201
,
45
56
.
Del Cerro
,
M. P.
and
Snider
,
R. S.
(
1968
).
Studies on the developing cerebellum: ultrastructure of growth cones
.
J. comp. Neurol
.
133
,
341
361
.
Delong
,
G. R.
and
Coulombre
,
A. J.
(
1965
).
Development of the retino-tectal topographic projection in the chick embryo
.
Exptl Neurol
.
13
,
350
363
.
Fraser
,
S. E.
and
Hunt
,
R. K.
(
1980
).
Retinotectal specificity: Models and experiments in search of a mapping function
.
A. Rev. Neurosci
.
3
,
319
352
.
Fraser
,
S. E.
,
Murray
,
B. A.
,
Chuong
,
C.-M.
and
Edelman
,
G. M.
(
1984
).
Alteration of the retinotectal map in Xenopus by antibodies to neural cell adhesion molecules
.
Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
.
81
,
4222
4226
.
Gaze
,
R. M.
,
Jacobson
,
M.
and
Szekely
,
G.
(
1963
).
The retino-tectal projection in Xenopus with compound eyes
.
J. Physiol., Lond
.
165
,
484
499
.
Gaze
,
R. M.
and
Sharma
,
S. C.
(
1970
).
Axial differences in the reinnervation of the goldfish optic tectum by regenerating optic nerve fibers
.
Expl Brain Res
.
10
,
171
181
.
Grierer
,
A.
and
Meinhardt
,
H.
(
1972
).
A theory of biological pattern formation
.
Kybernetik
12
,
30
39
.
Hausman
,
R.
and
Moscona
,
A.
(
1979
).
Immunological detection of retina cognin on the surface of embryonic cells
.
Expl Cell Res
.
119
,
191
204
.
Henke-Fahle
,
S.
and
Bonhoeffer
,
F.
(
1983
).
Inhibition of axonal growth by a monoclonal antibody
.
Nature
303
,
65
67
.
Hughes
,
W. F.
and
Lavelle
,
A.
(
1974
).
On the synaptogenic sequence in the chick retina
.
Anat. Rec
.
179
,
297
301
.
Kahn
,
A. J.
(
1974
).
An autoradiographic analysis of the times of appearance of neurons in the developing chick neural retina
,
Devi Biol
.
38
,
30
40
.
Kawana
,
E.
,
Sandri
,
C.
and
Akert
,
K.
(
1971
).
Ultrastructure of growth cones in the cerebellar cortex of the neonatal rat and cat
.
Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat
.
115
,
284
298
.
Leifer
,
D.
,
Lipton
,
S. A.
,
Barnstable
,
C. J.
and
Mashland
,
R. H.
(
1984
).
Monoclonal antibody to Thy-1 enhances regeneration of processes by rat retinal ganglion cells in culture
.
Science
224
,
303
306
.
Levi-Montalcini
,
R.
and
Booker
,
B.
(
1960
).
Destruction of the sympathetic ganglion in mammals by an antiserum to a nerve growth protein
.
Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
.
46
,
384
391
.
Lindner
,
J.
,
Rathjen
,
F. G.
and
Schachner
,
M.
(
1983
).
LI mono- and polyclonal antibodies modify cell migration in early postnatal mouse cerebellum
.
Nature
305
,
427
430
.
Moskal
,
J. R.
,
Trisler
,
D.
,
Schneider
,
M. D.
and
Nirenberg
,
M.
(
1986
).
Purification of a membrane protein distributed in a topographic gradient in chicken retina
.
Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
.
83
,
4730
4733
.
Müller
,
B.
,
Stahl
,
B.
and
Bonhoeffer
,
F.
(
1990
).
In vitro experiments on axonal guidance and growth-cone collapse
.
J. exp. Biol
.
153
,
29
46
.
Rabacchi
,
S. A.
and
Drager
,
U. C.
(
1987
).
A positional marker for the embryonic mouse retina
.
Neurosci. Abstsr
.
13
,
590
.
Schmidt
,
J. T.
,
Cicerone
,
C. M.
and
Easter
,
S. S.
(
1978
).
Expansion of the half retinal projection to the tectum in goldfish: An electrophysiological and anatomical study
.
J. comp. Neurol
.
177
,
257
278
.
Schwartz
,
M.
and
Spirma
,
N.
(
1982
).
Sprouting from chicken dorsal root ganglia induced by nerve growth factor is specifically inhibited by affinity-purified antiganglioside antibodies
.
Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
.
79
,
6080
6083
.
Sheffield
,
J. B.
and
Fishman
,
D. A.
(
1970
).
Intercellular junctions in the developing neural retina of the chick embryo
.
Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat
.
104
,
405
418
.
Sperry
,
R. W.
(
1963
).
Chemoaffinity in the orderly growth of nerve fiber patterns and( connections
.
Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
.
50
,
703
710
.
Thanos
,
S.
,
Bonhoeffer
,
F.
and
Rutishauser
,
U.
(
1984
).
Fiber-fiber interaction and tectalcues influence the development of the chicken retinotectal projection
.
Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
.
81
,
1906
1910
.
Thiery
,
J.-P.
,
Brackenbury
,
R.
,
Rutishauser
,
U.
and
Edelman
,
E. M.
(
1977
).
Adhesion among neural cells of the chick embryo. II. Purification and characterization of a cell adhesion molecule from neural retina
.
J. biol. Chem
.
252
,
6841
6845
.
Trisler
,
D.
(
1982
).
Are molecular markers of cell position involved in the formation of neural circuits?
Trends Neurosci
.
5
,
1
5
.
Trisler
,
D.
(
1983
).
Approaches to in vivo alteration of neuronal development with monoclonal antibodies
.
In Molecular Approaches to the Nervous System. Soc. Neurosci. Short Course Syllabus
, pp.
63
72
.
Trisler
,
D.
(
1987
).
Synapse formation in retina as influenced by molecules that identify cell position
.
Curr. Topics dev. Biol
.
21
,
277
308
.
Trisler
,
D.
,
Bekenstein
,
J.
and
Daniels
,
M. P.
(
1986
).
Antibody to a molecular marker of cell position inhibits synapse formation in retina
.
Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
.
83
,
4194
4198
.
Trisler
,
D.
and
Collins
,
F.
(
1987
).
Corresponding spatial gradients of TOP molecules in the developing retina and optic tectum
.
Science
237
,
1208
1209
.
Trisler
,
D.
,
Schneider
,
M. D.
and
Nirenberg
,
M.
(
1981
).
A topographic gradient of molecules in retina can be used to identify cell position
.
Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
.
78
,
2145
2149
.
Warner
,
A. E.
,
Guthrie
,
S. C.
and
Gilula
,
N. B.
(
1984
).
Antibodies to gap junction protein selectively disrupt junctional communication in the early amphibian embryo
.
Nature
311
,
127
131
.
Whitelaw
,
V. A.
and
Cowan
,
J. D.
(
1981
).
Specificity and plasticity of retinotectal connections: a computational model
.
J. Neurosci
.
12
,
1369
1387
.
Yoon
,
M. G.
(
1971
).
Reorganization of retinotectal projection following surgical operations on the optic tectum in goldfish
.
Expl Neurol
.
33
,
395
411
.