ABSTRACT
The physiological responses of white sucker (Catostomus commersoni Lacépède) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri Richardson), both reared in natural soft water, to a reduction in ambient pH were compared by simultaneous analyses of ion levels in various body compartments (plasma, muscle, whole fish) and net ion transfer rates. Following 24 h of exposure to acidified (H2SO4) natural soft-water, both species displayed a net influx of protons (or loss of base) and net losses of body Na+, Cl−, Ca2+, Mg2+, K+ and phosphate. The magnitude of ion loss from plasma was twice as large in the trout as in the sucker. Shifts of fluid from the extracellular to the intracellular fluid occurred in both species. Losses of ions from epaxial white muscle were small relative to intracellular ion losses from the rest of the body in both species.
The most notable finding was the entry of sulphate into the body fluids of both species, accumulating primarily in plasma and in the intracellular compartment of sucker and trout, respectively. The possible mechanism(s) and implications of sulphate influx into fish are discussed.
INTRODUCTION
Over the past decade, considerable attention has been placed on defining the physiological mechanisms involved in the responses of fish to acid environments (see reviews by Muniz & Leivestad, 1980; Fromm, 1980; Haines, 1981; Spry, Wood & Hodson, 1981; Brown, 1982; Leivestad, 1982; Wood & McDonald, 1982; McDonald, 1983a ; Howells, Brown & Sadler, 1983; Howells, 1984). The fish gill has been identified as the primary target of high ambient H+ levels. Disturbances in ionoregulation, acid-base regulation and oxygen transfer have all been implicated. The specific mode of action of high ambient H+ levels varies, however, with the severity of acid stress (pH < 4·0 versus pH > 4·0), acid type (HCl versus H2SO4), water hardness and carbon dioxide levels. A recent study by Hōbe, Wood & McMahon (1984b) also found that fish reared and examined in natural soft water were much more sensitive to external acid stress than those reared in hard water and examined in artificial soft water (Hōbe, 1985; Hōbe & McMahon, 1982). It is not yet clear, however, to what extent these findings are species-specific and/or reflect differences between acidified artificial and natural soft-water media.
Thus, one of the aims of the present study was to compare the responses of white sucker (Catostomus commersoni) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri), both reared in natural soft water, to acute acid (H2SO4) exposure. White sucker was of interest since it is native to soft-water lakes stressed by acid input (see Beamish, 1972; Hōbe et al. 1983, 1984b ; Fraser & Harvey, 1984). Rainbow trout was chosen because of the extensive literature now available on artificial soft-water acid exposure for this species (see reviews by Wood & McDonald, 1982; McDonald, 1983a; Wood, 1987) and one report on natural soft-water acid exposure (Hōbe, Laurent & McMahon, 1984a). In contrast with earlier studies, this study incorporated simultaneous sampling of various body compartments (plasma, muscle, whole fish) for ionic content as well as an analysis of a full spectrum of cation and anion net transfer rates.
Acidification of water to pH 4·0 with H2SO4 is associated not only with increased H+ levels but also with elevated inorganic sulphate levels. While the latter changes undoubtedly occurred in earlier studies of external acid stress (e.g. Hōbe el al. 1983, 1984a,b; McDonald, 1983b; McDonald, Walker & Wilkes, 1983; Fraser & Harvey, 1984; Lacroix, 1985; McKeon et al. 1985), their implications have been completely neglected. Thus, another aim of the present study was to examine the possibility of sulphate accumulating in acid-exposed fish.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experimental animals and media
White suckers (Catostomus commersoni, 200– 400 g) were collected from Lake Opeongo, a natural soft-water lake situated in Algonquin Park, using commercial trap nets (see Hōbe et al. 1984b). Rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri; 150– 250 g) were not found in Lake Opeongo and had to be obtained from a local soft-water hatchery (Skeleton Lake Hatchery, Bracebridge, Ontario; see Spry & Wood, 1985).
Prior to use in experiments, fish were held (sucker 1– 2 days; trout, 1– 2 weeks) in separate wooden holding tanks (10001) which received a continual supply of natural soft water (NSW; 12– 13°C) pumped from below the thermocline of the lake. NSW white suckers in the present study proved to be somewhat less sensitive to handling than previously reported (Hōbe et al. 1984b), probably because of the lower temperatures used (12– 13°C versus, 19– 20°C). Fish were not fed during either holding or experimentation.
During recovery from handling (12h) and experimentation, fish were kept individually in 2-to 3– 1 Lucite boxes which were contained within larger, black, rectangular boxes; an air-lift pump provided water flow through the Lucite box, while air lines at the circumference of the larger box mixed the two systems and provided adequate aeration (; 1 mmHg = 133·3 Pa). This closed-circuit experimental arrangement differed from that shown in McDonald (1983b) and described earlier by Hōbe et al. (1984b) in that larger rectangular boxes (301 capacity) and therefore total operational water volumes (9– 131) were used to lengthen sampling periods and to minimize the ambient pH changes resulting from ammonia excretion by the fish. Water ammonia levels did not exceed 200μequivl− during a closed-circuit experiment (see Cameron & Heisler, 1983).
Natural soft water (NSW, in mequivl−1; Na+, 0·05– 0·06; Cl−1, 0·02–0·03; Ca2+, 0·16– 0·17; K+, 0·01– 0·02; Mg2+, 0·09-0·10; SO42−, 0·15– 0·20) was used in all experiments. No acclimation of fish was required. Acidified NSW was prepared in 7001 polyethylene reservoirs by titration to pH 4·0 with H2SO4; vigorous aeration was sufficient to remove carbon dioxide released during acidification. With the exception of flux periods during which the system was maintained on closed-circuit, each experimental flux box received a continual flow of lake water (0·2– 0·31 min−) at either ambient pH (6·8 for the control group) or acid pH (4·2 for the experimental group). This water was maintained at constant temperature (12– 13°C) by passing it through glass coils in a polyethylene tank (4001) equipped with a cooling unit (Mino-cool ; 746 W). During closed-circuit flux periods, temperature control was provided by water jacketing the flux boxes with natural well water (9– 10°C). Acid conditions (pH ≈ 4·0– 4·3) were maintained in the flux boxes by frequent monitoring of ambient pH (at 0·5-to 2·0-h intervals) and subsequent addition of measured amounts (10– 30ml) of 0·01 moll− H2SO4 on the basis of the ratio of fish body mass to operational water volume; the level of SO42− in the flux boxes was therefore not constant during acid exposure but ranged from initial values of 0·4 to 0·8mequivl−1 over a 24-h flux period.
Experimental protocol
Two experimental series were performed. Series I was conducted to examine whole-body net ion and acidic equivalent flux rates together with the ionic status of various body compartments (plasma, epaxial white muscle, whole fish) in NSW white suckers (uncannulated) held in near-neutral NSW (series la; mean mass 380 ± 13 g; N=6) and during acute exposure to acidified NSW at 12– 13°C (series lb; mean mass 243 ± 32g; N=5). Series II was conducted to measure similar variables in soft-water hatchery-bred rainbow trout (uncannulated) held in near neutral NSW (series IIa; mean mass 160 ± 9g; N = 6) and during acute exposure to acidified NSW (series lib; mean mass 198 ± 8g; N = 5). Following recovery (from handling), each fish was either held in control NSW for 24 h and then exposed to acid conditions for 24h (acid series lb, lIb) or maintained in control NSW for an additional 24h (control series Ia, IIa).
The sampling regime in each medium was as follows. The control series (la, IIa) were held in closed-circuit flux boxes (water volume 12– 131) for 48 h to assess the effect of confinement. For net flux rate determinations, water samples (65 ml) were collected at 12h intervals and analysed for ion concentration (Na+, Cl-, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+), titratable proton content (TA) and ammonia (NH3+NH4+) levels. Water sulphate (SO42-) levels were also measured but only in the 0, 24 and 48 h samples. At the end of the 48-h period, fish were killed rapidly and weighed. Terminal blood samples were removed by caudal puncture (Hōbe el al. 1984b). Epaxial white muscle samples (1– 3 g, in duplicate) were excised just posterior to the dorsal fin in all cases because of the known variation in muscle ion content between different regions of the fish (Love, 1970). Blood, muscle and whole fish were processed later (as described below) for cation (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+) and anion (Cl−, SO42−, phosphate) analyses. No measurements of plasma [K+] or [phosphate] and muscle [SO42−] or [phosphate] were made. In the acid series (Ib, IIb) after 24h in control NSW (no measurements) each flux box (water volume 9– 101) was flushed (70– 1001) for 30 min to switch completely from control to acidified NSW. Water samples were collected at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h and measured for [Na+], [Cl−] and [K+], Other procedures for collecting water samples for ion analyses and terminal sampling (at 24 h of acid exposure) were identical to those described above for series la and IIa.
Analytical techniques and calculations
Intact fish were prepared for the analysis of total body water and ion content using procedures similar to those outlined above for muscle but with the following modifications. Whole fish were oven-dried (1– 2 months; 90°C) and total body water (TBW; ml kg−1) was calculated. The dried fish were macerated to a fine powder with a blender. Four subsamples were dissolved in either concentrated (16moll−; 5ml for cations) or dilute (0·2 mol I−; 10 ml; for anions) nitric acid and left for at least 1 week in a 37°C oven to ensure solubility; following filtration, each sample was analysed for ion levels, as described below. Total whole-body ion concentrations (mequiv kg−1 body water; [χ]wb) were calculated using the equation given above for [χ]m. Values were subsequently partitioned into intracellular (whole-body [χ]ICF) and extracellular concentrations (whole-body [χ]ECF) using the equation given above for muscle [χ]ECF and respective body compartmental volumes (ICFV, ECFV; estimated using Cl-Ksp; Conway, 1957).
The concentrations of cations (mequivl−1) in samples of plasma, epaxial white muscle supernatant, whole fish filtrate and water were measured, after appropriate dilution, using atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Perkin Elmer 5000) and an air/acetylene flame. Ionization interferences on Na+ and K+ analyses were eliminated by swamping samples and standards with 1 g 1−1 caesium chloride. Chemical interferences were eliminated from Ca2+ and Mg2+ measurements by swamping with 1 gl−1 lanthanum chloride.
The concentrations of anions (mequiv 1−) in various samples were determined by different techniques, depending upon availability of instrumentation. Cl− levels were measured either directly (undiluted plasma; Radiometer Model CMT 10) or indirectly (water and muscle; Buehler Model 4– 2500); for the latter, a modified acid reagent (spiked with 2mmoll−1 NaCl) and calibration standards (range 0·01– 2·0 mequiv1−1 Cl−) were used (Hōbe et al. 1984b).
Total sulphate concentration was determined indirectly using the residual barium method of Dunk, Mostyn & Hoare (1969) and modifications by Logan, Morris &cRankin (1980). The method was further modified as follows. To 2 or 3 ml of sample [undiluted water; diluted (30-fold) plasma and diluted (80-fold) whole-body preparations spiked with 500μequivl− SO42−], 1ml of 800μmoll− BaCl2 was added and the mixture was allowed to stand for 48– 72 h at room temperature. Following centrifugation (3000– 4000 g), residual barium in the supernatant was measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Perkin Elmer 5000) using a nitrous oxide/acetylene flame. Calibration was by magnesium or ammonium sulphate standards and found to be linear within the range 100– 1000μequivl− SO42−. Samples and standards were swamped with 1 g 1−1 caesium chloride to prevent ionic interferences. Some standards were also supplemented with dilute nitric acid (<0·02 mol 1−1) to match the amount present in whole-body preparations. Preliminary analyses revealed that samples containing high levels of nitric acid (>0·05 mol 1−1) gave spurious data.
An ion chromatograph (Dionex Model 10), equipped with concentrator (Model 30825), anion separator (Model 30827) and cation suppressor columns (Model 30829), was also used for the analysis of anions (Cl−, PO43−, SO42−) in samples of water and whole-body preparations. Eluent (0·0043 mol 1− NaHCO3 and 0·0034 mol 1−1 Na2CO3) flowed through the columns at a rate of 80 ml h−. Columns were regenerated after 6– 8 samples with 0·5 mol 1−1 H2SO4 and distilled water. Filtered samples (2ml), diluted with eluent (concentration as above), were measured. Calibration was with a standard containing 0·0282 mequivI−1 Cl−, 0·0316mequivl−1 PO43− and 0·1041 mequiv−1 SO42−. This technique provided results which were similar to those obtained with other methods (described above). Whole-body and intracellular phosphate (phosphate) levels (see Figs 6, 7) were converted from mmol I−1 to mequivl−1 by assuming that 78 % of body phosphate was in bone as PO43− in combination with calcium (ratio 1·75 mmol Ca2+per mmol PO43−; Weiss & Watabe, 1978) with the remainder in the form of PO42−.
Water ammonia (NH3 + NH4+) concentration (mequivl−) was determined by a micromodification of the salicylate hypochlorite technique of Verdoux, van Echteld & Dekkers (1978). Titratable proton content (μequiv ml−1 ; or titratable alkalinity) of water samples (10 ml), collected at the beginning and end of a flux period, were determined by acid titration (0·01 moll−1 H2SO4; end point pH4·0; Hōbe et al. 1984b). Water pH measurements were made with a combination pH electrode (Radiometer Model G 2402C) coupled to a digital acid-base analyser (Radiometer PHM 72).
Statistical data analyses
Calculations were performed on individual fish for each variable but data have been expressed throughout as means (±S.E.M.) unless otherwise stated. In all series, between-group and within-group statistical comparisons were performed using unpaired and paired Student ‘s two-tailed /-tests, respectively. Significant differences (P<0·05) between control and acid groups are indicated in each figure by an asterisk. Within-group comparisons have only been described in the text.
RESULTS
Net ion flux rates
During the 48 h in control NSW (series la, IIa), patterns in Jnet over each of the four 12-h flux periods were not significantly different for any of the ions measured (data not shown). Thus, the flux periods for each ion were averaged and grand means presented as control rates (Figs 1,2). Note that both white sucker and trout were virtually in net whole-body ion balance in near-neutral NSW. Thus, confining fish in the experimental chambers for 48 h seemed to have no measurable effect on any of the variables.
During 24 h of exposure to acidified NSW (series Ib, IIb), there was a significant net influx of acidic equivalents (or loss of basic equivalents) in both species but the pattern of response differed (Fig. 1A). In the white sucker, reached a maximum Fate [216·86 ± 13 78 (5) mequiv kg−1 h−1] over the first 12 h ; this arose mainly from an elevation in (175%; Fig. 1B) and to a lesser extent (77%; Fig. 1C).
During the remaining 12 h, had recovered because of a slight reduction in and marginal elevation in . In contrast, in trout attained a peak rate [187·57 ± 19·61 (5) μequiv kg− h−] over 12– 24 h of acid exposure; this arose from a doubling of (Fig. 1C) together with an elevation (138%) in (Fig. 1B). There was also a marked net influx of sulphate over the 24-h period with reaching 138·71 ±25·35 (5) and 68·12± 14·82 (5) μequivkg− h− in acid-exposed white sucker and trout, respectively (Fig. 1D).
Net losses of other ions occurred concomitantly. became highly negative over the first 6h at rates of −394·36 ± 24·63 (5) and -377·67 ± 22·00 (5) μequivkg−1 h−1 in white sucker and trout, respectively; these loss rates decreased progressively but did not return to control rates by 12– 24 h (Fig. 2A). The pattern of variation in differed between the two species (Fig. 2B); in trout, a peak loss rate of −339-29 ± 29-51 (5) μequivkg−1 h−1 occurred over the initial 6h, declining thereafter, whereas 6-12h was required for the rate of loss to reach a maximum of −260·97 ± 18-67 (5) /tequiv kg−1 h−1 in the white suckers. exhibited a three-fold increase over the first 6h in white suckers, remaining elevated thereafter, while no significant change was detected in trout until 6−12 h, when rose to −74·11 ± 12·66 (5) μequiv kg−1 h−1 (Fig. 2C). reversed from positive control rates to negative rates of −30·27 ± 9-34 (5) and −20·80 ± 3·63 (5) μequiv kg−1 h−1 in white sucker and trout, respectively, over the initial 12 h of acid exposure, but returned to rates not significantly different from zero over the remaining 12 h (Fig. 2D). Significant net losses of Mg2+ occurred in both species (Fig. 2E), mainly over the first 12h of acid exposure.
Fluid compartmental volumes
By 24 h of exposure to acidified NSW, there was a significant redistribution of fluid from the extracellular to the intracellular compartment in white sucker (and trout), resulting in a net whole-body shift of 40– 50 ml kg−1 (Table 1). This overall change in body fluid distribution was qualitatively reflected in epaxial white muscle which exhibited a decrease in ECFV and rise in ICFV in both species. In contrast with white sucker, no significant increase in TMW was observed in trout. Additionally, the net shift of fluid in muscle was only 20– 40 ml kg−1, which was not of sufficient magnitude to explain the corresponding size of the whole-body fluid shift, suggesting that other body compartments may also be involved.
Ionic status of selected body compartments
The total concentration of measured ions in plasma had also dropped significantly in both species by 24h of acid exposure (Fig. 3; compare heights of gamblegrams), primarily as a result of alterations in [Na+]p and [Cl−1]p. In white sucker, the magnitude of decrease in [Na+]p (14%) was less than that found for [Cl−1]p (20%), whereas virtually identical reduction of [Na+]p (32%) and [Cl−1]p (30 %) occurred in trout. In turn, [Ca2+]p was reduced (5 %) and [Mg2+]p raised (8 %) in white sucker, while both variables were depressed in trout (8% and 11%, respectively). No significant change in [SO42−]p was seen in trout, while a marked six-fold elevation occurred in white suckers. Note that the data given for [K+]p in Fig. 3 were taken from another study on acid-exposed cannulated NSW suckers (unpublished results), in which a 2·5-fold rise in [K+]p was shown; a similar increase in [K+]p was assumed to occur in acid-exposed NSW trout, since this response has been reported earlier for acid-exposed hard-water trout (McDonald & Wood, 1981).
The total concentration of measured ions in epaxial white muscle was also reduced in both species by 24 h of acid exposure (Fig. 4), mainly as a consequence of changes in [K+]m (10—12%), although the depressions in [Na+]n) (37-44%) and [Cl-]m (27-29%) were both significant. In white sucker, significant changes in [Mg2+]n) (10%) and in [Ca2+]m (two-fold rise) also occurred. Since modest shifts in muscle fluid compartmental volumes were found in both species (Table 1), changes in ion levels in the intracellular compartment of muscle (Fig. 5) were not necessarily representative of those in total muscle (Fig. 4), particularly for ions (Na+, Cl−1) which have high extracellular (or plasma) concentrations. Indeed, in both species, muscle [C1−1]ICF more than doubled while [Na+]ICF remained unchanged. Trends in [K+]ICF [Ca2+]ICF and [Mg2+]ICF (Fig. 5) were all similar to those seen in respective total muscle levels (Fig. 4).
The total concentration of measured ions in whole fish samples was well below control levels by 24 h of acid exposure (Fig. 6). This arose from a significant reduction in both species (white sucker versus trout) of [Na+]wb (26% vs 27%), [Cl-]wb (27% vs 33%), [K+]wb (7% vs 8%), [Ca2+]wb (8% vs 9%) and [phosphate] wb (5 % vs 6 %). A significant decline (7 %) in [Mg2+]wb also occurred in white suckers. Superimposed on these changes was a significant elevation in [SO42−]wb in both white sucker (35 %) and trout (34%). The concentrations of ions in the intracellular compartment of whole fish also exhibited significant variation by 24 h of acid exposure (Fig. 7). Intracellular ion loss prevailed in both species as a result of a marked depression in whole-body [K+]ICF (15– 16%), [Ca2+]ICF (16– 17 %) and [phosphate]ICF (13– 14%). In white suckers, a significant decrease in both whole-body [Na+]ICF (27 %) and [Mg2+]ICF (16%) was also observed. Whole-body [CP]ICF increased significantly (three-fold) to a similar extent in both species. A rise in whole-body [SO42−]ICF was seen in both species but the change was only significant in trout.
DISCUSSION
Ionie status of selected body compartments in soft water fish
The measured concentrations of Na+, Cl−, Ca2+ and Mg2+ in plasma of both white sucker and trout (Fig. 3) correspond closely with those reported earlier for either species in NSW (Hōbe et al. 1984a,b;Fraser & Harvey, 1984; Spry & Wood, 1985). Plasma SO42− levels have not been previously documented for fish reared in NSW. The 2-to 3-fold lower values observed in white suckers relative to trout (Fig. 3) were not surprising since other plasma ion levels were consistently lower in the former. Measurements on fish reared in hard water (HW) are scanty in the literature; reported values range from 0·8mequivI−1 in the freshwater tarpon, Megalops atlantica (Urist, 1963) to 5·3mequivl−1 in the freshwater whitefish, Coregonus clupeoides (Robertson, 1954; Urist, 1963). Note also that the observed levels of monovalent ions in epaxial white muscle tissue for either white sucker or trout (Fig. 4) were at least 2-to 5-fold lower than those reported earlier for either species in HW (Eddy & Bath, 1979; McDonald & Wood, 1981; Wilkes, 1984). Perhaps the most notable feature of the whole-body ion data (Fig. 6) was the low levels of Cl− observed in both species compared with reported values for HW trout (Eddy & Bath, 1979) and just recently for NSW white sucker (Fraser & Harvey, 1984). The reason for these discrepancies, particularly with the NSW white sucker are not known. The marked difference in whole-body Ca2+ and phosphate levels between white sucker and trout (Fig. 6) was also interesting. This cannot be attributed to differences in body water content because these data were consistently higher rather than lower in white sucker (Table 1). The proportion of bone relative to body mass has been shown to vary between fish species (see Weiss & Watabe, 1978, 1979; Cameron, 1985) which probably explains the present findings since fish bone consists mostly of hydroxyapatite [Ca10(PO4)6(OH2) ; Dacke, 1979]. Direct comparisons with other studies of body Ca2+ (Wood & McDonald, 1982; Fraser & Harvey, 1984) and phosphate levels (Phillips et al. 1960) were not feasible because of differences in age and/or size of fish. Whole-body SO42− levels have not been previously documented for either species (Fig. 6). The only other known measurement is for brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis, by Phillips et al. (1960); reported values were 1·5– 2·0 times higher, perhaps because of the smaller fish (5 g) used in their study.
Acid exposure
The results of this study on the effects of acute exposure to acidified NSW on net ion transfer rates in both white suckers and rainbow trout (Figs 1, 2) qualitatively confirm earlier studies on these species in acidified NSW (Hōbe et al. 1984a,b) and artificial soft water (Hōbe, 1985; McDonald, 1983b; McDonald et al. 1983). These include a net influx of H+ (or loss of base) concomitant with net losses of body Na+, Cl−, K+ and Ca2+. New findings include a reduction in body Mg2+ and phosphate levels, together with an elevation in body SO42− levels (Figs 1, 2, 6).
A comparison of the calculated ion budgets (total body net transfers, extracellular fluid and intracellular fluid losses or gains) for acid-exposed NSW white suckers, between the present study (see Table 2) and the one by Hōbe et al. (1984b) was informative. The observed net influx of SO42- (Fig. 1D), for instance, probably accounts for most of the net ion charge discrepancy found in the study by Hōbe et al. (1984b). Preliminary results also indicate that a net loss of phosphate occurs in acid-exposed fish at a rate which would explain the net charge deficit calculated in Table 2. Furthermore, ambient temperature appears to modify the effects of acid exposure. At low temperature (12– 13°C; present study), the net gain of H+ (or loss of base) is slightly less, while changes in plasma ion levels (particularly Na+ and Cl-) are more severe but, because some ion redistribution occurs from the extracellular to the intracellular fluids, total net body ion losses are up to one half those at high temperatures (19– 20°C; Hōbe et al. 1984b). The pattern of net ion loss also differs such that at low temperature net Na+ loss exceeds net Cl− loss while the reverse trend is seen at a higher temperature.
The observed changes in the levels of Na+ and Cl- in epaxial white muscle cells were rather small (Fig. 4), indicating that other sites known to have high concentrations of these ions (i.e. liver, heart, brain; Murphy & Houston, 1977) probably accounted for the corresponding changes seen in whole-body intracellular levels of Na+ and Cl− (Fig. 7). Similar findings have been reported for acid-exposed rainbow trout in hard water (McDonald & Wood, 1981). The majority of the observed whole body NaCl losses (Fig. 6), however, arose from the extracellular (i.e. plasma), but not the intracellular, compartment (see Hōbe et al. 1984b). In contrast, other body ion losses originated largely from the intracellular compartment. Epaxial white muscle cells were the main source of both K+ and Mg2+ losses (Fig. 4). Shifts of these ions from muscle to plasma would explain the elevations in plasma K+ and Mg2+ levels previously reported for acid-exposed white suckers in NSW (Hōbe et al. 1984b). The source of Ca2+ and phosphate losses was probably the intracellular compartment of bone (Hōbe et al. 1984b).
The marked haemoconcentration found earlier in white suckers exposed to acidified NSW (Hōbe et al. 1984b) can now be attributed to a redistribution of body fluid from the extracellular fluid to the intracellular fluid (see Table 1) rather than to water loss from the body, as reported for hard-water acid-exposed rainbow trout by Milligan & Wood (1982). This shift of fluid volume may have been a consequence of the loss of plasma ions (Fig. 3) across the gills, which would generate osmotic and ionic gradients favouring the entry of water into the intracellular fluid space and electrolyte flux in the opposite direction (McDonald & Wood, 1981 ; Milligan & Wood, 1982). The magnitude of this shift, however, did not differ between species (Table 1) over 24 h of exposure to acidified NSW. In fact, it was equivalent to that reported for hard-water rainbow trout after 72 h of acid exposure (Milligan & Wood, 1982).
Some of the effects of acid exposure differed between the two species tested. First, the magnitude of plasma ion loss in white suckers was at least half that in trout, confirming earlier findings on both species in acidified artificial soft water (Hōbe & McMahon, 1982; McDonald, 1983b). Second, the pattern of plasma ionic disturbance differed, probably as a consequence of the constraints of electroneutrality, in face of the rise in plasma SO42− levels in white sucker but not in trout (Fig. 3). Finally, the decrease in plasma strong ion difference (SID; sum of cations minus sum of anions; shaded areas of histogram in Fig. 3; Stewart, 1978) observed in white sucker but not in trout would correlate with the blood acidosis known to develop in white sucker (Hōbe & McMahon, 1982; Hōbe et al. 1984a) but not in trout (McDonald, 1983b) during exposure to acidified soft-water conditions.
Importance of sulphate
The present study is the first to establish that SO42− penetrates into freshwater teleost fish during acute exposure to low ambient pH, as indicated by both the highly positive Jnet (Fig. ID) and the significant elevation in whole-body SO42− levels (Fig. 6). This permeation was not a transient response, but was maintained with prolonged acid exposure since a nine-fold increase in plasma SO42− levels has also been observed in white suckers at 84 h (Hōbe, 1985) as opposed to a six-fold rise at 24 h (Fig. 3). The appearance of radiosulphate in blood plasma of acid-exposed white sucker and trout following its addition to the external medium (unpublished results) provides further support. Accumulation of radiosulphate in other body compartments (e.g. bone, muscle) at neutral pH has also been reported earlier in both the freshwater brook trout, Salmo fontinalis (Phillips et al. 1960), and the tropical guppy, Lebistes reticulatus (Rosenthal, 1961, 1963). A new interpretation of many ion transport studies in the fish literature which have assumed sulphate impermeability (e.g. Garcia-Romeu & Maetz, 1964), may therefore now be needed.
The site of SO42− entry was not examined, but the gill epithelia may be implicated since other divalent ions (i.e. Ca2+) have been shown to enter body fluids via this pathway (Payan, Mayer-Gostan & Pang, 1981; Mayer-Gostan et al. 1983; Hōbe et al. 1984a; Perry & Wood, 1985). Indirect support comes from Rosenthal (1961) who found that the magnitude of [35S]sulphate influx into the body of Lebistes, and the logarithmic relationship between isotope influx rate and external sulphate levels, were both similar to the observations on 45Ca flux in this species (Rosenthal, 1957).
The mechanism involved in inward SO42− transport is uncertain. In neutral pH media, active entry would be predicted from the prevailing concentration gradient (= 10; [ion]blood)/[ion]medium). The absorption of SO42− at neutral ambient pH has been reported to double in brook trout following a 10°C rise in ambient temperature (Phillips et al. 1960), also suggesting an active process. However, the mechanism during acid exposure may be different since the positive gill transepithelial electrical potential (McWilliams & Potts, 1978; McWilliams, 1982) and an increase in gill permeability (unpublished results), which are known to develop in acid-exposed fish, would both tend to favour passive SO42− influx. Another possibility is that in acidified media, the unionized acid may diffuse into blood and subsequently dissociate. This was suggested from the observed changes in and (Fig. 1) which were parallel in both pattern (i.e. net influx) and magnitude during acid exposure. Gutknecht & Walter (1981) have recently implicated such a mechanism in their studies of molecular acid transport through artificial lipid bilayer membranes. Unfortunately, this argument is difficult to prove experimentally because the present analytical techniques do not allow differentiation between H+ influx and base efflux.
Ion efflux in freshwater fish is known to involve two independent outflows with part of the loss occurring across the gills and part via the kidney (Kirschner, 1979). Although these compartments were not analysed in the present study, the maximal excretory rates of SO42− reported for the marine teleost kidney (i.e. approximately 300μequivkg−1 h−1 ; Renfro & Pritchard, 1982) would be more than adequate to remove a sulphate-load equivalent to the one occurring in acid-exposed fish. This was not the case, however, as indicated by the marked retention of SO42− in plasma (white sucker; Fig. 3) and/or in the intracellular body compartment (white sucker and trout; Fig. 7). Net renal SO42 − secretion has not been demonstrated for vertebrates other than marine teleost fish (Berglund & Forster, 1958; Hickman, 1968 a,b; Renfro & Dickman, 1980; Renfro & Pritchard, 1982). Freshwater teleosts probably regulate plasma SO42− levels by intestinal and, to a lesser extent, renal reabsorptive processes, as in mammals (Lotspeich, 1947). Some support for this argument comes from a study on the freshwater teleost, Gambusia affinus, at neutral ambient pH (Ahuja, 1966) ; there were no renal responses when this fish was exposed to sulphate-enriched media but, instead, excess SO42− accumulated in the intestine. However, a more recent study on the freshwater rainbow trout, at neutral ambient pH (Oikari & Rankin, 1985), reported that the kidney of this species was capable of excreting excess SO42 − following an infusion of magnesium sulphate. These conflicting data, while they cannot be explained without a complete analysis of sulphate dynamics, suggest that the role of the kidney in sulphate homeostasis in freshwater fish may be species-specific and/or dependent on the mode and/or extent of an imposed sulphate load.
Importance of the acid anion relative to protons
To what extent is mortality in acidified media a consequence of penetration of the accompanying anion rather than the hydrogen ion? If gill function was disrupted simply by the presence of a high concentration of external H+, then at a given pH, all strong acids (e.g. H2SO4, HCl, HNO3) would be expected to have the same toxicity. Experimental evidence does not support this contention, since H2SO4 has been shown to be less toxic than HCl in both HW and ASW, at least at ambient pH values below 4 · 0 (Beamish, 1972; Packer & Dunson, 1972; Graham & Wood, 1981). This difference in toxicity can only be attributed to a change in the accompanying anion. Graham & Wood ‘s (1981) suggestion that elevated external SO42 − levels may have an ameliorative effect in acidified media by retarding H+ entry is not very convincing in the light of the present work, because it stems from the assumption that fish gills are impermeable to SO42 − which is certainly not the case. In fact, if SO42− ions play an ameliorative role, it is probably through some unknown internal rather than external mechanism. This argument, however, would not explain the paradoxical reversal of HCl and H2SO4 toxicides reported by Graham & Wood (1981) in rainbow trout in ASW at ambient pH values above 4 · 0. Other studies on the effects anion-supplemented media on freshwater fish are inconclusive; some (Daye & Garside, 1976; Graham & Wood, 1981; P. Laurent, personal communication) have reported that fish survive indefinitely in various sulphate salt solutions at neutral pH, while others have not (DeRenzis & Maetz, 1973). Another complication is the study by Ahuja (1970) which showed differences between fish species in their tolerance of sulphate-and chloride-enriched media at neutral pH. Unfortunately, no physiological mechanisms were examined in any of the studies outlined above.
In the absence of definite information, one can only speculate on the consequences of sulphate entry in to acid-exposed fish. It is possible that sulphate has no direct effect on gill function but its movement may indirectly alter the rate and/or direction of other ion transfers, simply through the demands of electroneutrality.
The present data, in combination with earlier observations (Hōbe & McMahon, 1982; Hōbe et al. 1983, 1984a,b; Hōbe, 1985; McDonald & Wood, 1981; McDonald, 1983a,b;,McDonald et al. 1983; Wood & McDonald, 1982; Wood, 1987), indicate that the mechanisms of action of low pH differ more markedly between species than between artificial and natural soft water. In the white sucker, failure of acid-base regulation, ionoregulation and probably oxygen uptake and transport all appear to be important contributors to mortality, but in rainbow trout failure of ionoregulation seems to be the main factor involved. The additional data on the entry of the acid anion provided in the present study, however, do not allow one to define the sequence of events that ultimately lead to fish death, since it is not possible to characterize the primary versus secondary effects of acid exposure.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to thank the Director, Dr J. MacLean and the staff of the Harkness Laboratory of Fisheries Research for their invaluable assistance and hospitality. Dr B. R. McMahon, my Ph.D. supervisor, is thanked for his support throughout this research project. D. J. Spry, C. L. Milligan and G. Hogan are thanked for their technical assistance. Dr C. M. Wood of McMaster University is thanked for the loan of equipment and supplies. This research was supported by grants to Dr B. R. McMahon from NSERC and to HH from the Alberta Heritage Fund for Medical Research.