The red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, follows an XX (female) and XY (male) sex determination system. Maternal supply of the protein Transformer (Tra) is required for XX insects to follow the female pathway. The nature and source of the signal that regulates male sex determination in XY beetles are not known. Parental RNAi-aided knockdown in expression of tra masculinizes genetic females (XX) that are fertile. The virgin females mated with these masculinized genetic females produced all female progeny. We present the genetic evidence to show that the factor responsible for male sex determination is present on the Y chromosome. These data also suggest that the Y chromosome in T. castaneum is not required for male fertility.

Insects are the most diverse group of the animal kingdom. Multiple sex determination mechanisms are found among different insect species. Comparison of these mechanisms suggests the existence of a common downstream regulatory pathway, i.e. Transformer (Tra)/Transformer-2 (Tra-2) regulation of doublesex (dsx) splicing (Verhulst et al., 2010). The coleopteran model insect Tribolium castaneum (Herbst 1797) follows an XX (female) and XY (male) sex determination system (Pease and Hahn, 2012). Maternal supply of tra is required to initiate the female sex determination cascade in XX embryos because parental RNAi of tra results in the production of all male progeny, which includes genetic males (XY) as well as masculinized genetic females (XX males) (Shukla and Palli, 2012). It has been hypothesized that an inhibitory signal from the Y chromosome curtails the establishment of the female sex determination cascade in XY embryos, resulting in the splicing of Tctra and Tcdsx pre-mRNAs into the male mode (Shukla and Palli, 2012). However, the experimental proof that the Y chromosome harbors the male sex determination signal in T. castaneum is lacking.

We hypothesized that a cross between masculinized genetic females (XX progeny of Tctra RNAi females) and virgin females (XX) would produce all female progeny if the male sex determination signal lies on the Y chromosome, or both male and female progeny if this signal is not located on the Y chromosome. To test this hypothesis, we crossed virgin females with masculinized genetic females. The data obtained from these crosses suggest that the male sex determination signal is present on the Y chromosome in T. castaneum. In addition, our experiments also showed that, unlike in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and in humans, the Y chromosome in T. castaneum is not required for male fertility.

We previously reported production of all male progeny when Tctra-dsRNA-injected females were mated with normal virgin males (Shukla and Palli, 2012). We took advantage of this observation to determine whether male sex determination genes are present on the Y chromosome. Tctra- or malE-dsRNA-injected females were mated with untreated virgin males and all progeny (males) resulting from this cross were mated with virgin females (Fig. 1). In the first experiment, 135 larvae (72 females and 63 males) were produced when five control malE-dsRNA-injected females were mated with five untreated virgin males. In contrast, mating of five Tctra-dsRNA-injected females with five untreated males produced only 80 larvae that developed into male pupae and adults. In the second experiment, 213 larvae (103 females and 110 males) were produced when five control malE-dsRNA-injected females were mated with five untreated virgin males. In contrast, mating of five Tctra-dsRNA-injected females with five untreated males produced only 108 larvae that developed into male pupae and adults. These data showed that mating of control beetles produced the expected 1:1 male to female ratio. In contrast, mating of Tctra-dsRNA-injected females with untreated males produced only male progeny, confirming our previous report (Shukla and Palli, 2012). Next, all progeny (males) developed from the eggs produced by TcTra RNAi females in both the experiments were crossed with untreated virgin females. In the first experiment, out of 80 pairs mated, two pairs produced all female progeny. In the second experiment, out of 110 pairs mated, three pairs produced all female progeny. In the first experiment, the average number of progeny detected in crosses that produced both males and females was 63 per female compared with 60 per female detected in crosses that produced only females. In the second experiment, the average number of progeny detected in crosses that produced both males and females was 55 per female compared with 49 per female detected in crosses that produced only females. These data showed that all females produced a similar number of progeny and approximately 2.5% of crosses produced only female progeny. Why did only 2.5% of crosses produce all female progeny? As explained previously (Shukla and Palli, 2012), it is possible that most of the XX progeny developed from the eggs produced by Tctra RNAi females died during early embryonic development, most likely because of misregulation of complex dosage-compensation genes. The presence of TcTra above the threshold levels required to inhibit the activation of dosage compensation pathway in a few XX individuals may have helped them to escape zygotic death. However, the TcTra in these individuals may not have reached levels required to execute the splicing of Tcdsx pre-mRNA into the female mode, resulting in the production of masculinized females.

Fig. 1.

Schematic diagram summarizing the experimental setup and results obtained.

Fig. 1.

Schematic diagram summarizing the experimental setup and results obtained.

We used Y-chromosome-specific and non-Y-chromosome-specific markers to determine the genetic makeup of male parents that produced all female progeny. In the first experiment, neither of the two masculinized females showed a Y-chromosome-specific marker (Fig. 2A). Similarly, in the second experiment, none of the three masculinized females showed a Y-chromosome-specific marker (Fig. 2B). These data showed that the crosses that produced all female progeny had a masculinized female (XX) as the male parent.

In insects, an amazing diversity of sex chromosome systems exists: male heterogamety, e.g. D. melanogaster (XY males), female heterogamety, e.g. butterflies and moths (ZW females), and haplodiploidy, e.g. bees, ants and wasps. Sex chromosome variations among different groups are further aided by different level of sex chromosome differentiation (reviewed in Kaiser and Bachtrog, 2010). Tribolium castaneum is an excellent model for the order Coleoptera, which follows an XY sex determination system. The maternally supplied tra homolog Tctra serves as a female sex determining signal in XX embryos of T. castaneum (Shukla and Palli, 2012). Maternal Tctra is inhibited in XY embryos by an unknown mechanism, forcing them to follow the male determination pathway. Parental RNAi of Tctra results in all male progeny, the majority of which are XY males. A few XX individuals are also converted to males as a result of Tctra parental RNAi.

According to Rice's hypothesis, genes with sex-biased or sex-specific expression are overrepresented on the X chromosome (Rice, 1984). Similarly, because the Y chromosome is never under selection in females, it is assumed to accumulate the genes that are beneficial to males (Kaiser and Bachtrog, 2010). Consistent with this, most of the genes on the Y chromosome in D. melanogaster are required for sperm motility and, in turn, male fertility (reviewed in Bernardo Carvalho et al., 2009). Our data suggest that the masculinized genetic females (XX) are fully fertile, as the number of progeny produced by the virgin females mated with these males is almost equal to the number of progeny in crosses between control beetles. In other words, it appears that the Y chromosome in T. castaneum does not contain any male fertility genes. Also, all the progeny produced by virgin females mated with XX males were females, suggesting that a factor responsible for male sex determination is present on the Y chromosome of T. castaneum. This is in contrast to D. melanogaster, where the Y chromosome has no role in male sex determination: sex in D. melanogaster is governed by the X:A ratio, i.e. the number of X chromosomes relative to the number of autosomes (Cline, 1993). The chromosomal position (Y-linked, autosome-linked or even X-linked) of the maleness factor varies in different populations of Musca domestica (Hamm and Scott, 2009). In Megaselia scalaris, the male determining factor lies within a transposable element and hence is present at different locations (Traut and Willhoeft, 1990). Interestingly, the Y chromosome in humans harbors a gene that regulates male sex determination as well as the genes required for male fertility (Skaletsky et al., 2003).

Fig. 2.

Multiplex PCR with Y-specific and non-Y-specific primers (Lagisz et al., 2010) amplifies two bands in males but only one band in females. No Y-specific amplification was detected in DNA isolated from masculinized females that supported production of all female progeny. C, normal females; M, masculinized females; −Ve, negative control; L, 1 kb DNA ladder.

Fig. 2.

Multiplex PCR with Y-specific and non-Y-specific primers (Lagisz et al., 2010) amplifies two bands in males but only one band in females. No Y-specific amplification was detected in DNA isolated from masculinized females that supported production of all female progeny. C, normal females; M, masculinized females; −Ve, negative control; L, 1 kb DNA ladder.

The data included in this communication provide genetic evidence for the presence of the male sex determination gene on the Y chromosome of T. castaneum. The initial characterization of Y sequences (1.5 MB of 5 MB) in T. castaneum suggests an active transcription of some genes, but none of them have been shown to be required for male sex determination (N. Grubbs, F.-C. Chu, M. Robinson, D. Bopp and M. D. Lorenzen, unpublished data). Therefore, the identity of the male sex determination factor remains elusive. Further studies on additional Y chromosome genes will help in the identification of the male sex determination factor in T. castaneum. Also, the mechanism by which the factor that regulates male sex determination inhibits the maternal Tctra in XY embryos needs further investigation.

For parental RNAi, 6-day-old virgin females (n=5) were injected with Tctra or malE dsRNA (control malE dsRNA was prepared using a fragment of the malE gene from Escherichia coli) and reared at room temperature. After 24 h, the dsRNA-injected females were transferred to standard rearing conditions and crossed with virgin males of the same age [see Shukla and Palli (Shukla and Palli, 2012) for details]. At 20 days after initiation of mating, the number of larvae was counted and the larvae were further reared to separate them according to sex during the pupal and adult stages. Sexing of pupae and adults was carried out as described previously (Shukla and Palli, 2012). Fig. 1 shows the schematic diagram of the experimental setup.

Each individual adult developed from the progeny of Tctra parental RNAi was crossed with a virgin female. After 10 days of mating, parents from each cross were transferred to corresponding numbered tubes and stored at −80°C in a freezer for future use. The larvae from these crosses were maintained under standard rearing conditions. After they developed to pupal and adult stages, the sex of each individual was recorded. DNA was isolated from parent beetles using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) and the genetic sex of male and female parents was determined using multiplex PCR employing Y-specific and non-Y-specific primers (Lagisz et al., 2010).

This is contribution number 14-08-05 from the Kentucky Agricultural Experimental Station.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (GM070559-10 to S.R.P.). Deposited in PMC for release after 12 months.

Bernardo Carvalho
A.
,
Koerich
L. B.
,
Clark
A. G.
(
2009
).
Origin and evolution of Y chromosomes: Drosophila tales
.
Trends Genet.
25
,
270
-
277
.
Cline
T. W.
(
1993
).
The Drosophila sex determination signal: how do flies count to two?
Trends Genet.
9
,
385
-
390
.
Hamm
R. L.
,
Scott
J. G.
(
2009
).
A high frequency of male determining factors in male Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) from Ipswich, Australia
.
J. Med. Entomol.
46
,
169
-
172
.
Kaiser
V. B.
,
Bachtrog
D.
(
2010
).
Evolution of sex chromosomes in insects
.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
44
,
91
-
112
.
Lagisz
M.
,
Wilde
K. E.
,
Wolff
K.
(
2010
).
The development of PCR-based markers for molecular sex identification in a model insect species Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)
.
Entomol. Exp. Appl.
134
,
50
-
59
.
Pease
J. B.
,
Hahn
M. W.
(
2012
).
Sex chromosomes evolved from independent ancestral linkage groups in winged insects
.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
29
,
1645
-
1653
.
Rice
W. R.
(
1984
).
Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism
.
Evolution
38
,
735
-
742
.
Shukla
J. N.
,
Palli
S. R.
(
2012
).
Sex determination in beetles: production of all male progeny by parental RNAi knockdown of transformer
.
Sci. Rep.
2
,
602
.
Skaletsky
H.
,
Kuroda-Kawaguchi
T.
,
Minx
P. J.
,
Cordum
H. S.
,
Hillier
L.
,
Brown
L. G.
,
Repping
S.
,
Pyntikova
T.
,
Ali
J.
,
Bieri
T.
, et al. 
. (
2003
).
The male-specific region of the human Y chromosome is a mosaic of discrete sequence classes
.
Nature
423
,
825
-
837
.
Traut
W.
,
Willhoeft
U.
(
1990
).
A jumping sex determining factor in the fly Megaselia scalaris
.
Chromosoma
99
,
407
-
412
.
Verhulst
E. C.
,
van de Zande
L.
,
Beukeboom
L. W.
(
2010
).
Insect sex determination: it all evolves around transformer
.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
20
,
376
-
383
.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.