Dynamic reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton is fundamental to a number of cellular events, and various actin-regulatory proteins modulate actin polymerization and depolymerization. Adenylyl cyclase-associated proteins (CAPs), highly conserved actin monomer-binding proteins, have been known to promote actin disassembly by enhancing the actin-severing activity of the ADF/cofilin protein family. In this study, we found that CAP1 regulated actin remodeling during mouse oocyte maturation. Efficient actin disassembly during oocyte maturation is essential for asymmetric division and cytokinesis. CAP1 knockdown impaired meiotic spindle migration and asymmetric division, and resulted in an accumulation of excessive actin filaments near the spindles. In contrast, CAP1 overexpression reduced actin mesh levels. CAP1 knockdown also rescued a decrease in cofilin family protein overexpression-mediated actin levels, and simultaneous expression of human CAP1 (hCAP1) and cofilin synergistically decreased cytoplasmic actin levels. Overexpression of hCAP1 decreased the amount of phosphorylated cofilin, indicating that CAP1 facilitated actin depolymerization via interaction with ADF/cofilin during mouse oocyte maturation. Taken together, our results provide evidence for the importance of dynamic actin recycling by CAP1 and cofilin in the asymmetric division of mouse female gametes.
This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.
The actin cytoskeleton consists of highly dynamic filament arrays, whose assembly and rapid turnover are essential during various stages of mammalian oocyte maturation, including asymmetric spindle migration, cortical actin cap formation, polar body extrusion and cytokinesis (Almonacid et al., 2014; Sun and Schatten, 2006; Yi and Li, 2012). Various actin-binding proteins play essential roles in the regulation of dynamic actin filament formation, elongation and depolymerization (Pollard and Borisy, 2003; Pollard and Cooper, 2009). For example, actin nucleators such as formin-2 (FMN2) (Dumont et al., 2007), SPIRE (Pfender et al., 2011) and the ARP2/3 complex (also known as ARPC) (Chaigne et al., 2015, 2013; Sun et al., 2011b) represent a family of proteins that initiate new actin filament formation and contribute to off-center meiotic spindle positioning. Whereas FMN2 and SPIRE are mainly involved in the formation of the cytoplasmic actin mesh network, the ARP2/3 complex (Chaigne et al., 2015, 2013; Sun et al., 2011b), JMY (Sun et al., 2011a) and N-WASP (Yi et al., 2011) are responsible for the cortical actin cap and subcortical actin network formation. In addition to actin nucleators, other actin-binding proteins, including capping proteins (Jo et al., 2015), tropomodulin (Jo et al., 2016), tropomyosins (Jang et al., 2014), and the actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin protein family, have emerged as important factors in cytoplasmic actin mesh network maintenance in mouse oocytes.
Modulation of the dynamic balance between filamentous actin (F-actin) and globular actin (G-actin) is a central mechanism of actin cytoskeleton regulation. To recycle actin monomers, the F-actin filament is depolymerized to form G-actin. Filament severing is mediated by ADF/cofilin family proteins, which bind to the sides of filaments (Bernstein and Bamburg, 2010). In addition to ADF/cofilin proteins, several other proteins are involved in efficient actin filament recycling. One type of protein involved in the actin-severing pathway is the adenylyl cyclase-associated protein (CAP, also known as SRV2 in yeast) (Freeman and Field, 2000). CAP was first identified as a component of the yeast adenylyl cyclase complex that regulates both the actin cytoskeleton and the Ras/cAMP pathway (Fedor-Chaiken et al., 1990; Field et al., 1990). A recent study showed that CAPs enhanced actin monomer recharging with ATP antagonistically to ADF/cofilin (Ono, 2013), and they also promoted the severing of actin filaments in cooperation with ADF/cofilin (Chaudhry et al., 2013). Yeast and mammalian CAP homologues enhanced actin filament severing by 4–8-fold (Chaudhry et al., 2013; Jansen et al., 2014)
Two distinct mammalian CAP isoforms are known, CAP1 and CAP2 (Hubberstey and Mottillo, 2002; Yu et al., 1994, 1999). In mammals, CAP1 is expressed ubiquitously, excluding in the skeletal muscle, and CAP2 is predominantly expressed in the brain, heart, skeletal muscle and testes (Yu et al., 1994). Human CAP1 has been found to play a key role in accelerating actin filament turnover by effectively recycling cofilin family proteins (cofilin hereafter) and actin and by interacting with both ends of the actin filament (Moriyama and Yahara, 2002). CAP1 depletion leads to alterations in the actin cytoskeleton, cofilin and FAK phosphorylation, as well as increased cell adhesion and motility, and abnormal morphology in various cells (Bertling et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2013). Mouse CAP1 forms hexameric structures that autonomously bind to F-actin, enhance cofilin-mediated severing, and catalyze the nucleotide exchange of actin (Jansen et al., 2014).
Considering the importance of CAPs in the actin dynamics of several cells, we investigated the role of CAP1 in the actin dynamics of murine oocyte maturation, where dynamic actin organization is crucial for spindle migration and asymmetric divisions.
CAP1 localized in the cytoplasm and at the cortical actin cap during mouse oocyte maturation
To investigate the functional role of CAP1 in mouse oocyte maturation, we first examined CAP1 subcellular localization during maturation. Oocytes were sampled at each developmental stage, corresponding to the mature germinal vesicle stage (GV), germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD), metaphase I (MI) and metaphase II (MII). Subcellular localization of endogenous CAP1 was monitored via immunofluorescence staining. CAP1 showed punctate distribution throughout the entire cytoplasm during all oocyte developmental stages (Fig. 1A). CAP1 was also enriched at the cortical actin cap during the MI stage (Fig. 1B; Fig. S1). To confirm CAP1 localization, we expressed exogenous mScarlet-fused human CAP1 (mScarlet–hCAP1) in MI mouse oocytes. mScarlet–hCAP1 was dispersed throughout the cytoplasm and at the actin cap (Fig. 1C), supporting the immunostaining localization results.
Knockdown of CAP1 induced meiotic arrest and impaired asymmetric division of oocytes
Previously, CAP1 depletion in somatic cells has been shown to lead to F-actin accumulation and cytoskeletal defects (Zhang et al., 2013). Therefore, to investigate the function of CAP1 during mouse meiotic maturation, we depleted CAP1 mRNA by introducing CAP1 siRNA into oocytes. We confirmed via western blotting (1.21±0.1 vs 0.52±0.4; mean±s.e.m.), immunostaining, and qPCR analyses (1.04±0.04 vs 0.12±0.05) that siRNA introduction caused CAP1 mRNA and protein depletion (Fig. 2A–C). CAP1 knockdown (CAP1 KD) oocytes frequently exhibited multiple polar bodies, abnormally large polar bodies, or membrane bleb (Fig. 2D,E). Co-injection of mScarlet–hCAP1 was shown to rescue these defects (Fig. 2D–H), with abnormal polar body extrusion rates of: control, 6.06±3.03%; CAP1 KD, 31.72±3.51%; rescue: 13.92±3.08% (Fig. 2G). Subsequently, we examined the effect of CAP1 knockdown on mouse oocyte maturation. The maturation rate of oocytes injected with CAP1 siRNA was lower than that of control oocytes. The percentage of oocytes that matured to the MII stage was significantly decreased in the CAP1-knockdown oocytes (Fig. 2I,J), with polar body extrusion rates of: control, 87.62±4.72%; CAP1 KD, 58.87±8.1%; rescue, 81.89±1.1% (Fig. 2J). Moreover, the ratio of polar body diameter to oocyte diameter was significantly higher in the CAP1 knockdown oocytes, which was also rescued by mScarlet–hCAP1 injection (Fig. 2K). An abnormally large polar body was defined as having a diameter 50% greater than that of the oocyte. Collectively, these results indicated that CAP1 depletion negatively impacted mouse oocyte asymmetric division.
Knockdown of CAP1 caused cytoplasmic actin mesh accumulation around the spindle during oocyte maturation and impaired spindle migration
Increased polar body size and symmetrical division is one of the main phenotypes associated with spindle migration failure in MI oocytes (Namgoong and Kim, 2016). Moreover, a dynamic cytoplasmic actin mesh is crucial for spindle migration during meiosis (Azoury et al., 2011, 2008). Therefore, we performed time-lapse microscopy to investigate the effects of CAP1 knockdown on spindle migration and dynamic cytoplasmic actin filament changes. The spindle moved from the center to near the cortex in control oocytes; however, in CAP1-knockdown oocytes, the spindle did not move or moved extremely slowly, resulting in cytokinesis failure or 2-cell-like oocytes (Fig. 3A). Based on the average spindle movement in control (n=17) and CAP1-knockdown (n=22) oocytes (Fig. 3B,C), it is evident that spindle migration speeds increased between 8 h and 9 h in control oocytes. In contrast, CAP1-knockdown oocytes showed substantially delayed migration or were immobile. We confirmed the delay in spindle movements of CAP1-knockdown oocytes by measuring the distances between the spindle and cortex 9 h after the resumption of oocyte maturation and through spindle immunostaining (Fig. 3D,E). Further, to investigate the effect of CAP1 knockdown on cytoplasmic actin levels, control and CAP1-knockdown oocytes at the GVBD, MI and MII stages were sampled and stained with phalloidin. We found an abnormally high level of actin mesh accumulation around the spindle in CAP1-knockdown oocytes (Fig. 3F). The amount of cytoplasmic actin mesh in CAP1-knockdown oocytes was significantly increased during the GVBD, MI and MII stages (Fig. 3G). These CAP1-knockdown-mediated actin accumulations were rescued by co-injection with mScarlet–hCAP1 at the MI stage (Fig. 3H,I). These results indicate that the CAP1 knockdown impairs spindle migration and induces abnormal cytoplasmic actin mesh accumulation.
Disruption of cytokinesis by CAP1 knockdown during meiosis I
To gain more insight into how CAP1 knockdown disrupts cytokinesis, time-lapse imaging of maturing oocytes with the presence of an actin probe (GFP–UtrCH) was performed after GVBD. In control oocytes, chromosomes migrated close to the cortex and polar body extrusion (Fig. 4A; Movie 1). In CAP1-knockdown oocytes, chromosomes segregated and initiated cytokinesis, resulting in multiple polar bodies and two-cell-like oocytes (Fig. 4A; Movies 2, 3). Moreover, we found that in some oocytes, cytokinesis occurred and the cleavage furrow was not completely formed, resulting in the reincorporation of the protruding membrane into the oocyte, which resembled a single-cell-like morphology. Cytokinesis failure in CAP1-knockdown oocytes caused segregated chromosome assembly and abnormally high levels of surrounding cytoplasmic actin mesh (Fig. 4B,C). The rate of cytokinesis failure in CAP1-knockdown oocytes was significantly higher than in the control group (control, 0±0%; CAP1 KD, 17.67±1.45%) (Fig. 4D). Collectively, these data suggest that CAP1 knockdown negatively affects cytokinesis.
Overexpression of full length CAP1 decreased cytoplasmic actin mesh levels
To provide functional evidence for the role of CAP1 in actin remodeling during oocyte maturation, we overexpressed human CAP1 as a fusion protein with mNeongreen (mNeongreen–hCAP1) and evaluated its effect on oocyte maturation and cytoplasmic actin mesh density. The maturation rate of oocytes expressing mNeongreen–hCAP1 was not significantly different than that of control oocytes (Fig. 5A,B). However, CAP1 overexpression either increased the number of oocytes with multiple polar bodies or caused oocytes to undergo asymmetric division, similar to the phenotypes observed in the CAP1-knockdown oocytes, with abnormal polar body extrusion rates of: control, 4.97±1.63% (mean±s.e.m.); mNeongreen–hCAP1, 11.97±2.66% (Fig. 5C). Because CAP1 depletion can increase the cytoplasmic actin mesh density, even in an abnormal mesh, we examined whether CAP1 overexpression can reduce the amount of cytoplasmic actin mesh. MI oocytes were collected and stained with phalloidin (Fig. 5D). Oocytes overexpressing full-length CAP1 had significantly reduced cytoplasmic actin mesh levels (Fig. 5E). Moreover, cytokinesis failure was observed in CAP1-overexpressed oocytes (control, 0±0%; mNeongreen–hCAP1, 9.56±0.62%) (Fig. 5F,G). Using time-lapse imaging, we found in some oocytes overexpressing CAP1 that cytokinesis failed, but the chromosomes segregated and reassembled (Fig. 5H; Movies 4, 5), similar to phenotypes observed in some CAP1-knockdown oocytes shown in Fig. 4C. These results further support that proper CAP1 levels are essential to maintain the cytoplasmic actin mesh and to ensure cytokinesis during oocyte maturation.
Interaction of CAP1 with cofilin is required to maintain cytoplasmic actin mesh level
ADF/cofilin is a family of actin-binding proteins that cooperate with CAP1 and facilitate actin filament turnover (Moriyama and Yahara, 2002). Previously, non-phosphorylated cofilin levels were shown to be increased through inhibiting rho-associated kinase (ROCK), which impaired oocyte maturation (Duan et al., 2014), indicating a role of cofilin in oocyte maturation. However, the relationship between cofilin and its interaction partner CAP1 has not been investigated in mouse oocytes.
Because CAPs enhance the actin-severing activity of cofilin in vitro (Jansen et al., 2014), CAP1 knockdown in oocytes may complement excessive expression of active (S3A mutant) cofilin, which effectively decreases actin levels (Wang et al., 2017). We examined the amount of actin mesh under various conditions: CAP1 knockdown, constitutively active cofilin overexpression, and both CAP1 knockdown and cofilin overexpression. As expected, CAP1-knockdown oocytes showed increased actin accumulation, whereas cofilin-overexpressing oocytes showed decreased cytoplasmic actin levels. Upon simultaneous CAP1 knockdown and cofilin overexpression, actin levels increased as compared with cofilin-overexpressing oocytes, but not as much as in knockdown-only oocytes (Fig. 6A,B). These data indicate that the CAP1 knockdown-mediated increase in actin levels is related to cofilin activity.
We also tested the relationship between cofilin and CAP1 using the ROCK inhibitor Y-27632, which effectively increases non-phosphorylated cofilin levels (Duan et al., 2014). We observed a similar significant decrease in the actin mesh level upon ROCK inhibitor (50 μM) treatment (Fig. 6C,D). However, simultaneous treatment of ROCK inhibitor and CAP1 knockdown did not show significant differences between only ROCK inhibitor-treated oocytes (Fig. 6C,D).
Further, we investigated the synergistic effects of mNeongreen–hCAP1 and cofilin–GFP (S3A) expression on cytoplasmic actin mesh disassembly in mouse oocytes and found that CAP1 enhanced cofilin-mediated disassembly. Simultaneous expression of mNeongreen–hCAP1 and cofilin–GFP (S3A) was found to elicit a greater decrease in the actin mesh level than separate expression (Fig. 6E,F), suggesting a synergy between CAP1 and cofilin in the maintenance of actin mesh levels. We further examined the potential effects on cofilin phosphorylation after CAP1 overexpression. Cofilin phosphorylation at Ser 3 was significantly decreased (Fig. 6G,H). Therefore, our results suggest that CAP1 is required to maintain the cytoplasmic actin mesh level through its interaction with cofilin.
CAPs are evolutionarily conserved actin cytoskeleton regulatory proteins with many suggested biochemical roles, including sequestering G-actin and enhancing nucleotide exchanges (Ono, 2013), enhancing actin filament severing (Chaudhry et al., 2013) and enhancing actin filament oligomerization (Balcer et al., 2003). The knockdown or knockout of CAPs have been shown to impair cell migration in mammalian cells (Bertling et al., 2004) or Dictyostelium (Noegel et al., 1999). It has also been reported that CAPs are involved in the actin cable assembly required for the endocytosis of yeast (Toshima et al., 2016). However, their functional role in mouse oocyte maturation, where actin remodeling-mediated spindle migration is crucial for asymmetric division, is unexplored. In this study, we provide evidence that CAP1 plays a crucial role in actin cytoskeleton remodeling during mouse oocyte maturation, presumably in collaboration with ADF/cofilin.
Depletion of CAP1 in mouse oocytes disrupted spindle migration, cortical actin cap formation and cytokinesis. Specifically, we observed the accumulation of excessive cytoplasmic actin mesh around spindles after CAP1 knockdown. The depletion of actin nucleators responsible for the formation of new actin filaments, such as FMN2 (Leader et al., 2002), SPIRE (Pfender et al., 2011) and the ARP2/3 complex (Sun et al., 2011b), or actin-binding proteins responsible for the maintenance of actin filaments, such as capping protein (Jo et al., 2015), tropomodulin (Jo et al., 2016), tropomyosin-3 (Jang et al., 2014) or filamin A (Wang et al., 2017) have been shown to impair asymmetric division by decreasing actin networks in oocytes. In contrast, excessive amounts of actin filaments in the cytoplasm have also been shown to be detrimental to spindle migrations, as seen with actin stabilization through GFP–UtrCH overexpression (Holubcová et al., 2013). The accumulation of actin filaments upon CAP1 knockdown corresponds to the role of CAP1 in facilitating the depolymerization of actin filaments.
Phosphorylated cofilin was distributed at the periphery of the spindle in mouse oocyte, which is consistent with previous work (Duan et al., 2018). We also found that CAP1 overexpression can decrease cofilin phosphorylation, which reduces actin mesh levels. Moreover, the expression of CAP1 and constitutively active cofilin synergistically decrease actin levels, indicating that the in vivo effect of CAP1 in mouse oocytes may be related to cofilin. The CAP1 knockdown phenotype is partially rescued by the overexpression of cofilin, suggesting that CAP1 may facilitate actin depolymerization by cofilin in mouse oocytes.
An intriguing observation from this study is that CAP1 localized in the cortex actin cap regions of mouse oocytes and was essential for actin cap formation and spindle migration. The cortical actin cap, which forms near the approaching spindle and promotes spindle positioning, contains a dense actin network (Yi et al., 2013; Yi et al., 2011). Cortical actin cap formation is dependent on the ARP2/3 complex, Rho family GTPases, and various nucleation-promoting factors (Leblanc et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013). Previously, a CAP1-null mutation and mutations in the ARP2/3 complex pathway were shown to synergistically enhance morphological defects, suggesting that CAP1 is actively involved in ARP2/3-dependent actin regulation, or that CAP1 and ARP2/3 are involved in the same process (Deeks et al., 2007). CAP1 was also shown to be localized on the actin-rich lamellipodia of migration cells (Bertling et al., 2004; Freeman and Field, 2000), where ARP2/3-mediated actin polymerization and cofilin-mediated actin depolymerization is required (DesMarais et al., 2004). These results suggested that the dynamic nature of the actin cap structure is required for fast actin nucleation and depolymerization by ADF/cofilin, and that CAP1 may facilitate these processes during oocyte maturation.
It is clear that CAP1 is involved in actin filament depolymerization in mouse oocytes, but questions remained about how CAP1 is involved in this process. The most obvious interaction candidate is ADF/cofilin, which is the main driver of actin depolymerization in many cells. CAP1 has been shown to displace ADF/cofilin from ADP–actin monomers, which allowed for the recycling of ADF/cofilin for new rounds of filament depolymerization and actin monomers to replenish the assembly-competent pool of actin (Balcer et al., 2003). The N-terminal half of mouse CAP1 forms a hexameric structure with six symmetrical protrusions, and has been shown to sufficiently augment ADF/cofilin-mediated turnover and enhance cofilin-mediated severing by 8-fold (Jansen et al., 2014; Moriyama and Yahara, 2002). This activity was abolished with mutations at conserved surfaces on the HFD domain (Quintero-Monzon et al., 2009). Our data revealed similar results to previous studies. Co-expression of mNeongreen–hCAP1 and cofilin–GFP (S3A) elicited a greater decrease in the actin mesh level than separate expression (Fig. 6E). After CAP1 overexpression, cofilin phosphorylation decreased significantly (Fig. 6G,H), suggesting that CAP1 overexpression increases cofilin activity. Actin accumulation caused by CAP1 knockdown could also be rescued partially by cofilin overexpression, suggesting the possibility that some of the effect of CAP1 knockdown may be caused by cofilin. Previously, CAP1 and cofilin have not been successfully co-precipitated in IP assays (Zhang et al., 2013). Thus, further understanding of the molecular and biochemical mechanisms of the CAP1–cofilin interaction remained elusive. In addition, mouse N-CAP1 hexamers bind autonomously to F-actin, independent of cofilin. Under these conditions, N-CAP1 binding alters actin filament structure, leading to an increase in filament crossover distance and opposing the twisting effects of cofilin. These observations raise the possibility that N-CAP1 enhances severing by introducing local discontinuities in filament topology to accelerate cofilin-mediated fragmentation (Jansen et al., 2014). Moreover, another protein, twinfilin, has been found to catalyze depolymerization at the ends of actin filaments in concert with CAP (Johnston et al., 2015), indicating the possibility of a cofilin-independent mechanism of actin depolymerization by CAP. The presence and potential role of twinfilin in concert with CAP in mouse oocytes would need to be investigated further.
We also showed that hCAP1 overexpression reduced cofilin phosphorylation and decreased actin accumulation. It is not clear how hCAP1 overexpression reduced the phosphorylation levels of cofilin; however it has been suggested that the accumulation of cytoplasmic actin filaments may serve as a mechanism to protect cells by producing abnormally high cofilin activity (Zhang et al., 2013). CAP1 may be involved in cofilin activity regulation via interaction with slingshot phosphatase (Niwa et al., 2002), which dephosphorylates and activates cofilin.
Recently, actin filament reorganization has been implicated in proper chromosome segregation during meiosis I (Mogessie and Schuh, 2017). Considering that CAP1 knockdown resulted in the accumulation of actin filaments near the spindle and chromatin, CAP1-mediated actin depolymerization may be required for the proper segregation of chromosomes and prevention of segregation errors.
Collectively, our data showed that CAP1-mediated actin depolymerization activity is essential for spindle migration in mouse oocytes. This is the first report showing that ablation of actin depolymerization machinery impairs spindle migration in mouse oocytes by accumulation of actin filaments, demonstrating the importance of dynamic actin filament remodeling during oocyte maturation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All mice used in this study were 6–8-week-old ICR female mice. Animal care and handling were conducted in accordance with the policies regarding the care and use of animals issued by the ethics committee of the Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Korea.
Ovaries from 6–8-week-old female ICR mice were sliced open using a blade to release germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes, which were placed in M2 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 2.5 μM milrinone to prevent germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) during microinjection. Only intact GV oocytes were collected for further studies. The selected oocytes were placed in M16 medium under liquid paraffin oil at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2 for specific incubation periods. All reagents and media were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise stated.
Total RNA was extracted from 20 oocytes at each stage using the Dynabead mRNA DIRECT kit (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA). Corresponding cDNA was obtained via reverse transcription of the mRNA with a cDNA synthesis kit (Takara, Kyoto, Japan), using Oligo(dT)12–18 primers and SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen). The primers used for real-time PCR (RT-PCR) were 5′-AAA CCT GGC CCC TTT GTG AA-3′ (forward) and 5′-TGA CCC AGT CCA CAT GCT TC-3′ (reverse). The amplification program was 95°C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles at 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 20 s, and a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min.
A 5 mM solution of Y-27632 (Sigma-Aldrich) in water was diluted in M16 medium to a concentration of 50 mM. Oocytes were then cultured in this medium for various times. Control oocytes were cultured in fresh M16 medium.
Approximately 5–10 pl of 100 μM CAP1-targeting siRNA [5′-CUGUAUGGAGACGGUUCUU (dTdT)-3′ corresponding to 274–1698 bp of mouse Cap1 full-length sequence (NM_001301067.2), Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea] was microinjected into the cytoplasm of a fully-grown GV oocyte using an Eppendorf FemtoJet and a Nikon Diaphot ECLIPSE TE300 inverted microscope equipped with a Narishige MM0-202N hydraulic 3-dimensional micromanipulator. After injection, the oocytes were cultured in M16 medium containing 2 μM milrinone for 20 h to ensure knockdown of CAP1, washed five times for 2 min each with fresh M16 medium, transferred to fresh M16 medium, and cultured under paraffin oil at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. Control oocytes were microinjected with 5–10 pl of AccuTarget Control siRNA (SN-1001, Bioneer).
Western blot analysis
A total of 200 mouse oocytes per sample were placed in 1× SDS sample buffer and heated at 99°C for 5 min. Proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes in 1× transfer buffer. The membranes were blocked in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T) and 5% nonfat milk for 1 h, followed by incubation at 48°C overnight with either rabbit anti-CAP1 (1:1000; ab88446, Abcam) or mouse anti-β-tubulin antibodies (1:1000; D3U1W, Cell Signaling Technology). The membranes were washed three times with TBS-T (10 min each) and incubated for 1 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit-IgG or anti-mouse-IgG (1:1000; sc-2004 and sc-2005, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Signals were detected using Pierce ECL western blotting substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Oocytes were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde (w/v) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; P4417, Sigma-Aldrich) containing 0.1% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), followed by permeabilization with 1% Triton X-100 (v/v) for 20 min at 37°C. After a 1 h incubation in blocking buffer [PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA)], the samples were incubated with various antibodies in a blocking buffer overnight at 4°C and washed three times with washing buffer (0.5% Triton X-100 and 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS-PVA). To examine the kinetochore–microtubule attachments, oocytes were briefly chilled at 4°C to induce depolymerization of non-kinetochore microtubules just before fixation. The antibodies used were rabbit anti-CAP1 (1:1000; ab88446, Abcam), rabbit anti-phospho-cofilin (Ser3) (1:1000; 77G2; Cell Signaling Technology) and anti-α-tubulin (1:500; F2168, Sigma-Aldrich). Secondary antibodies were conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 (1:100; SAB4600234, Sigma-Aldrich) and Alexa Fluor 594 (1:100; SAB4600321, Sigma-Aldrich) for 1–2 h at room temperature and washed three times with washing buffer. To stain the cytoplasmic actin mesh or cortical actin, the oocytes were fixed and stained with phalloidin-tetramethylrhodamine (10 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich), which labels F-actin. The oocytes were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma Life Science) (10 mg/ml in PBS) for 15 min, mounted on a glass slide, and examined using a Zeiss LSM 710 META confocal laser-scanning microscope.
Construction of recombinant plasmids and in vitro transcriptions
For mNeongreen- or mScarlet-fused hCAP1 expression, a construct encoding the human CAP1 open reading frame was obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (Stokie, Illinois, USA) and cloned into pRN3 vectors (Lemaire et al., 1995), followed by in vitro transcription using an mMessage mMachine T3 Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
For visualization of the actin filament, GFP–UtrCH was used as an F-actin probe (Burkel et al., 2007), which was obtained from Addgene (26737; Cambridge, MA, USA). pRN3-H2B-mCherry plasmids were kindly provided by Dr JungSoo Oh (Sung Kyun Kwan University, Suwon, Korea).
For the generation of constitutively active cofilin, the serine 3 residue was mutated to an alanine residue to prevent phosphorylation (Moriyama et al., 1996). The corresponding mutated gene was cloned into PCS2+ vectors (Jang et al., 2014), followed by in vitro transcription and poly(A) tailing performed with an SP6 mMessage mMachine Kit and a Poly(A) Tailing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Briefly, siRNA, cRNA, cofilin–GFP (S3A), mNeongreen- or mScarlet-fused hCAP1, or GFP–UtrCH mRNAs were microinjected into GV oocytes. After injection, the oocytes were cultured for 20 h in M16 medium containing milrinone to allow for exogenous protein expression. The oocytes were stained with 200 nM of SiR-tubulin (Cytoskeleton, Denver, CO, USA) for 5 h to visualize the spindles. Time-lapse imaging was performed with a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 710 META) equipped with a Plan Apochromat 406 1.2 NA water-immersion objective, and a Chamlide observation chamber and incubator system (Live Cell Instrument, Seoul, Korea).
Each experiment was performed in triplicate or greater. Statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS software package (version 11.5; SPSS). The significant differences between groups were analyzed using the Student's t-test. The data were expressed as the mean±s.e.m., and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the data. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
The authors thank all group members for their insights and critical reading of the manuscript.
Conceptualization: Z.-L.J., S.N., N.-H.K.; Methodology: S.N.; Formal analysis: Z.-L.J.; Investigation: Z.-L.J., Y.-J.J.; Data curation: Z.-L.J.; Writing - original draft: S.N.; Writing - review & editing: S.N.; Supervision: S.N., N.-H.K.; Funding acquisition: N.-H.K.
This work was supported by grants from the Rural Development Agency, Republic of Korea, Next Generation Biogreen 21 Program [grant number PJ009594].
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.