Regeneration after damage requires early signals to trigger the tissue repair machinery. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) act as early signals that are sensed by the MAP3 kinase Ask1, which in turn activates by phosphorylation the MAP kinases p38 and JNK. The sustained or high activation of these kinases can result in apoptosis, whereas short or low activation can promote regeneration. Using the Ask1-dependent regeneration program, we demonstrate in Drosophila wing that PI3K/Akt signaling is necessary for Ask1 to activate p38, but not JNK. In addition, nutrient restriction or mutations that target Ser83 of the Drosophila Ask1 protein, a PI3K/Akt-sensitive residue, block regeneration. However, these effects can be reversed by the ectopic activation of p38, but not of JNK. Our results demonstrate that Ask1 controls the activation of p38 through Ser83, and that the phosphorylation of p38 during regeneration is nutrient sensitive. This mechanism is important for discriminating between p38 and JNK in the cells involved in tissue repair and regenerative growth.
One of the most exciting questions in regenerative biology is how damaged cells signal to their surviving neighbors to stimulate tissue repair (Hariharan and Serras, 2017). The stress-activated MAP kinases Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 respond to the oxidative stress generated by damaged cells (Diwanji and Bergmann, 2018; McCubrey et al., 2006; Serras, 2016). These multitasking kinases regulate a variety of cell functions, including healing, growth and apoptosis (Martínez-Limón et al., 2020). Several MAP3 kinases are known to operate upstream of JNK and p38 (Sakauchi et al., 2017; Son et al., 2013; Takeda et al., 2008). Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (Ask1), a MAP3 kinase that, upon oxidative stress, oligomerizes to become activated (Sakauchi et al., 2017), has emerged as a potential signal in the damage response in Drosophila epithelia (Patel et al., 2019; Santabárbara-Ruiz et al., 2019; Toshniwal et al., 2019). In its inactive form, Ask1 is bound to its inhibitor thioredoxin (Saitoh et al., 1998). Upon oxidative stress, thioredoxin dissociates from the thioredoxin-binding domain of Ask1, enabling Ask1 to oligomerize and its threonine-rich kinase domain to autophosphorylate, leading to its activation and function as a MAP3 kinase (Fig. 1A) (Liu et al., 2000; Nishida et al., 2017; Saitoh et al., 1998).
Genetically induced cell death in Drosophila imaginal discs results in oxidative stress that activates p38 and JNK, triggering regeneration (Brock et al., 2017; Fan et al., 2014; Fogarty et al., 2016; Fox et al., 2020; Herrera and Morata, 2014; Herrera et al., 2013; Khan et al., 2017; Santabárbara-Ruiz et al., 2015, 2019; Serras, 2016). In this context, Ask1 acts upstream of p38 and JNK, and is sensitive to reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Patel et al., 2019; Santabárbara-Ruiz et al., 2019). Phosphorylation of p38 is an early response to damage that occurs alongside JNK (Santabárbara-Ruiz et al., 2019). However, JNK can also trigger apoptosis (Pinal et al., 2019). How increased p38 phosphorylation can coexist with tolerable, presumably low, levels of JNK remains unclear.
There are many observations that support an antagonism between p38 and JNK, mainly reinforced by the finding that p38 can negatively regulate JNK activity in mammalian cells (Wagner and Nebreda, 2009). For example, the inhibition of p38 in mammalian myoblasts, epithelial cells and macrophages leads to the activation of JNK (Cheung et al., 2003; Perdiguero et al., 2007). Moreover, Jun-deficient hepatocytes show increased p38α phosphorylation (Stepniak et al., 2006). Therefore, we speculated that the mechanism that activates p38 during Drosophila regeneration operates concomitantly with a reduction of JNK. As MAP3 kinases are key regulators of MAPK activity, we decided to investigate how Ask1 discriminates between p38 and JNK, and particularly how Ask1 fuels p38-dependent regeneration.
We have previously shown that the Ser83 residue of the Drosophila Ask1 protein is required for tissue repair, and that phosphorylation of Ask1 at Ser83 depends on PI3K/Akt signaling (Santabárbara-Ruiz et al., 2019). Insulin signaling through the PI3K/Akt pathway indicates the nutritional status of an animal and regulates tissue growth (Hietakangas and Cohen, 2009). Here, we present evidence that the Ser83 residue of Ask1 is key for activating p38, but not JNK; therefore, discriminating between p38 and JNK. Moreover, we show that nutrients and PI3K/Akt signaling are necessary for p38 activation in cells involved in regeneration
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Activation of p38 but not JNK requires the Ser83 residue of Ask1
The YH_GVRESF sequence located in the N-terminal region of Ask1 is highly conserved from sponges to humans (Fig. 1A and Fig. S1A). This sequence is present in the Ask1-PC isoform of Drosophila and contains the Ser83 residue (Ser174 in humans and Ser181 in mouse). Phosphorylation of Ser83 by Akt is required to control Ask1 kinase activity, occurring in the same cells that activate p38 during regeneration (Santabárbara-Ruiz et al., 2019). This prompted us to hypothesize that Ser83 of the Ask1 protein could be essential for p38 activation.
We have previously demonstrated that the ectopic activation of wild-type Ask1 (UAS-Ask1WT) resulted in a moderate increase in Ask1 activity in the absence of extra thioredoxin inactivation (Santabárbara-Ruiz et al., 2019). Ectopic expression of Ask1WT in wing imaginal discs using the patched-Gal4 driver (hereafter ptc>) did not increase phosphorylated p38 (P-p38) levels beyond basal values (Fig. 1B,C). As the sole expression of Ask1 is not enough to phosphorylate p38, we decided to determine whether p38 phosphorylation requires Akt and the Ser83 residue of Ask1. We used ptc-Gal4 to drive the expression of three transgenic combinations and tested them for p38 activation, as follows.
(1) In the control experiments, we ectopically expressed Akt and GFP. To activate Akt, we used the UAS-Pdk1:UAS-Akt1 recombinant construct (hereafter Pdk1:Akt). This transgene allows co-expression of Akt and phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 (Pdk1), the gene encoding the kinase downstream of the insulin pathway that phosphorylates and activates Akt1 (Fig. 1A′). This construct ensures the ectopic expression of both genes and the activation of Akt without killing the cell. In this transgenic combination, we co-expressed Pdk1:Akt with UAS-GFP as a neutral transgene.
(2) One of the experimental conditions consisted of the ectopic expression of Pdk1:Akt and the wild-type form of Ask1 (Ask1WT) to test the activation of Ask1 by Akt. (3) The other experimental condition consisted of the co-expression of Pdk1:Akt and the mutant Ask1S83A, which cannot undergo Akt-dependent phosphorylation at Ser83. We first tested whether Akt was active in these combinations using an antibody against phospho-Akt (P-Akt). This revealed that P-Akt concentrated in the ptc stripe with similar intensities in all three transgenic conditions (Fig. S1B-E).
We found that P-p38 did not significantly increase in the ptc stripe of cells when Pdk1:Akt was co-expressed with GFP (Fig. 1D). Instead, P-p38 significantly increased when Pdk1:Akt was co-expressed with Ask1WT (Fig. 1E,G). P-p38 was highly concentrated in the ptc>stripe, although some labeling could also be observed in the cells anterior to the stripe. It is conceivable that this anterior staining resulted from the persistence of the early ptc-Gal4 expression in the anterior compartment rather than a non-autonomous effect from dying cells, as no or only a few dead cells (positive for caspase Dcp1) were found (Fig. S2A-C) (Bosch et al., 2016; Evans et al., 2009). By contrast, P-p38 did not increase when Pdk1:Akt was co-expressed with the mutant Ask1S83A, either in the ptc>stripe or in the anterior compartment (Fig. 1F,G). Therefore, we concluded that the Ser83 of the YH_GVRESF sequence is essential for p38 activation in PI3K/Akt signaling.
The same genotypes were tested with an antibody that recognizes the activated and phosphorylated form of JNK (Fig. S2E,F), observing that the basal levels did not respond to the ectopic expression of Pdk1:Akt, the co-expression of Pdk1:Akt and AskWT, or the co-expression of Pdk1:Akt and Ask1S83A (Fig. 2A-E). This was confirmed by analyzing matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1), a known target of JNK signaling, which was only found to be associated with the very few apoptotic cells generated by the ectopic expression of the transgenes (Fig. S2A-D). These results demonstrated that the Akt-dependent phosphorylation of Ask1 at Ser83 is canalized through p38 and not through JNK, suggesting that the Ask1-dependent activation of JNK requires factors other than Akt.
The catalytically inactive Ask1K618M mutant acts as a dominant-negative form that prevents phosphorylation of JNK (Kuranaga et al., 2002). We found that the increase of P-p38 in the discs co-expressing Pdk1:Akt and Ask1WT could not be reproduced after the co-expression of Pdk1:Akt and the Ask1K618M mutant (Fig. 1G,H). In addition, the co-expression of Pdk1:Akt and Ask1K618M did not elicit significant changes in P-JNK levels (Fig. 2E,F). The activity of Akt, as tested with the anti-P-Akt antibody, in the discs co-expressing Pdk1:Akt and Ask1K618M was similar to that of the other transgenic combinations (Fig. S1B-E,J). In conclusion, the inactive form of the Ask1 protein results in neither p38 nor JNK phosphorylation.
Ask1 activity was determined with an anti-P-Thr Ask1 antibody: a phospho-threonine antibody that targets the core of the Ask1 catalytic domain. This antibody showed increased staining in the discs co-expressing Pdk1:Akt and Ask1S83A compared with the Pdk1:Akt, Ask1WT and Pdk1:Akt, Ask1K618M discs (Fig. S1F-I,K). The co-expression of Pdk1:Akt and Ask1WT resulted in a very weak staining, although this was not statistically significant, suggesting that the ectopic expression of Akt attenuated P-Thr Ask1 levels (Fig. S1G). These results are consistent with previous observations showing a moderate increase in P-Thr Ask1 levels in UAS-Ask1WT-expressing cells and a strong increase in P-Thr Ask1 levels in the Ask1S83A-expressing cells, which concur with the role of Ser83 in the attenuation of Ask1 activity (Santabárbara-Ruiz et al., 2019). We propose here that this attenuation results in low levels of Ask1 activity that are still sufficient to activate p38. This is important for cell survival, as strong stimulation of Ask1 can result in apoptosis (Kuranaga et al., 2002). Together, these observations indicate that the activation of p38, but not JNK, is the result of the cooperation between the Ask1 kinase domain and the Ser83 residue of the YH_GVRESF sequence, which is tightly dependent on PI3K/Akt signaling.
Ectopic activation of p38 signaling rescues the defective regeneration caused by nutrient restriction
As P-p38 depends on Akt, we decided to study the role of p38 in regeneration under conditions of nutrient restriction. To trigger regeneration, genetic ablation was induced using the modified version of the LexA (LHG) transactivator system that can be conditionally controlled with the temperature-sensitive Gal80TS (Yagi et al., 2010). We used the wing-specific salE/Pv enhancer to drive the expression of LHG in the cells of the central part of the wing disc where the pro-apoptotic construct lexO-rpr was activated (salE/Pv-LHG lexO-rpr). In addition, we used the transactivator Gal4/UAS to drive the expression of a second transgene (UAS-GFP, UAS-licWT or UAS-hepWT) in the same individuals (Fig. 3A). The expression of any of these three transgenes driven by nub-Gal4 in unablated discs did not affect the normal pattern of the wings, although a small reduction in size was detected for UAS-licWT and UAS-hepWT in comparison with the control UAS-GFP (Fig. S3).
We first analyzed the wing imaginal discs of animals grown in standard food conditions (100% yeast concentration) in which we induced apoptosis (salE/Pv-LHG lexO-rpr) and activated a neutral transgene (nub-Gal4 UAS-GFP). In these animals, wing discs showed P-p38 surrounding the apoptotic domain (Fig. 3B). Adult animals emerged with normally regenerated wings in 97% of the females and 89% of the males, suggesting a high regeneration capability (Fig. 3E,F). In the controls kept at 17°C to block cell death, 100% of the wings were normal (Fig. 3G,H). The dimorphic phenotype could be due to the fact that females initiate metamorphosis at a larger body size than males and, in addition, females grow faster than males during the last phase of larval growth (Testa et al., 2013).
However, under conditions of nutrient restriction (10% yeast), P-p38 was absent in the wing discs (Fig. 3I) and the percentage of normally regenerated wings dropped to 67% in females and 50% in males (Fig. 3L,M). These animals had smaller wings (Fig. 3E,F,L,M) and showed a lack of veins and interveins as well as missing sectors of the wing (Fig. 3N,O). These results demonstrated that patterning and size of regenerated wings were affected by the nutritional status. In control animals (10% yeast) kept at 17°C to block cell death, the wings were normal, but smaller (Fig. 3N,O).
Next, we analyzed whether ectopic activation of p38 could restore regeneration in nutrient restricted animals. As constitutive activation of p38 can cause cell death (Huang et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2019), we used a wild-type allele of licorne (licWT), a serine/threonine kinase that phosphorylates p38. This resulted in moderate levels of P-p38 and a few scattered apoptotic cells (Fig. S2G). Expression of licWT under normal food conditions did not allow regeneration (Fig. 3E,F), likely because of the toxicity resulting from the excessive levels of P-p38 caused by both ectopic expression and genetic ablation (Fig. 3C). However, following nutrient restriction, the levels and distribution of P-p38 were similar to those of GFP in the animals grown in standard food conditions (compare Fig. 3J with 3B). The percentage of regenerated wings in licWT-expressing flies increased above 90% (Fig. 3L,M). In addition, the wing size increased to levels that were similar to those of the controls at 17°C.
We also tested whether JNK could restore regeneration. JNK signaling was induced moderately by the expression of the wild-type form of the Drosophila JNKK, hemipterous (hepWT) (Uhlirova and Bohmann, 2006). The expression of hepWT, but not of GFP or licWT, resulted in an increase of P-JNK (Fig. S4A-G). The activation of hepWT did not result in P-p38 around the apoptotic zone of the discs (Fig. 3C,J) and did not reverse the defects in regeneration resulting from nutrient restriction (Fig. 3E,F,L,M). Altogether, these results showed that licWT, but not hepWT, was able to revert the effects of nutrient limitation, indicating that the p38 pathway is highly sensitive and responsive to nutrients to drive regeneration.
To further demonstrate that p38 activation was driven through the Ser83 residue of Ask1, we combined cell death with the expression of the Ask1S83A mutant (Fig. 4A). Under these conditions, P-p38 levels were no higher than basal levels (Fig. 4B), while wing regeneration dropped to around 10%, the wing size was reduced (Fig. 4E) and wings showed patterning defects (Fig. 4G,H). Concomitant expression of Ask1S83A and licWT resulted in higher levels of P-p38 (Fig. 4C), and an increase in the percentage of regenerated wings, to up to more than 67%, as well as an increase in the wing size (Fig. 4E,F) and recovering of the wing pattern (Fig. 4G,H). By contrast, P-p38 staining did not change after the ectopic expression of Ask1S83A and hepWT (Fig. 4D), and did not lead to recoveries in the percentages of regenerated wings, wing size or patterning (Fig. 4E-H). In these Ask1S83A experiments, the expression of hepWT, but not of licWT or GFP, caused the phosphorylation of JNK in the nub>domain (Fig. S4H-K).
From our results, we concluded that Ser83 of the Ask1 YH_GVRESF sequence is necessary for integrating nutrient signals and the insulin pathway to initiate the p38-dependent damage response. It has been demonstrated that Ask1 and p38 play an important role in the stress-triggered regeneration of the gut (Patel et al., 2019). Perhaps not only in discs, but also in other organs such as the gut, the synergy between ROS and nutrients/Akt through the Ser83 residue of Ask1 is necessary for the activation of p38.
p38 and JNK respond to damage differently. It is known that JNK is associated with cell death and that there is a mutual antagonism between p38 and JNK (Wagner and Nebreda, 2009). Dying cells lack P-p38, possibly because of a reduction of P-Akt levels in apoptotic cells (Franke et al., 2003), and therefore they are unable to attenuate P-Thr Ask1 activity. Indeed, P-Thr Ask1 has been found to be highly accumulated in the apoptotic zones of the disc (Santabárbara-Ruiz et al., 2019). We speculate that this could result in the activation of JNK in damaged cells, which then promotes apoptosis (Shlevkov and Morata, 2012). Although P-JNK is not abundant in dying cells, reporters of JNK signaling have been associated with apoptotic cells (Pinal et al., 2019). As previously suggested, the attenuated form of Ask1 might not only be key for p38 activation, but also for maintaining low levels of JNK in regenerating cells (Santabárbara-Ruiz et al., 2019). Therefore, both MAPKs play a role in regeneration: p38 in a manner that is dependent on nutrients and on PI3K/Akt; and JNK independently of them. In addition to the attenuated or low levels of Ask1, the MAP3 kinase Tak1 could operate independently of nutrients to activate JNK (La Marca and Richardson, 2020).
In summary, we propose two roles for Ask1 in regenerating cells: one in the attenuation of catalytic activity to avoid cell death in regenerating cells; and the other in the activation of p38 to propel regeneration. In the future, it will be fundamental to unveil the mechanisms of tissue repair triggered by p38.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The salE/Pv-LHG, lexO-rpr, UAS-Ask1WT and UAS-Ask1S83A Drosophila melanogaster strains have been previously described (Santabárbara-Ruiz et al., 2015; Santabárbara-Ruiz et al., 2019), as have UAS-licWT1.1 (Terriente-Félix et al., 2017), UAS-hepWT (Uhlirova and Bohmann, 2006), UAS-Ask1K618M (Kuranaga et al., 2002), UAS-Pdk1 and UAS-Pkb1/Akt1 (which were recombined and a gift from H. Stocker, ETH, Zürich, Switzerland), and salE/Pv-Gal4 (Santabárbara-Ruiz et al., 2015). The following strains were provided by the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center: tubGal80TS (RRID:BDSC_7017), ptc-Gal4 (RRID:BDSC_2017), UAS-GFP (RRID:BDSC_4776) and UAS-Ask1RNAi (RRID:BDSC_35331). The following are described in FlyBase: hh-Gal4, dpp-Gal4 and nub-Gal4. The UAS-bskRNAi strain was obtained from the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center (VDRC V104569).
The Gal4/UAS/Gal80TS system for transgene activation in the wing imaginal disc
The ptc-Gal4 strain expressed Gal4 in a central stripe of the wing imaginal discs. Experiments with the UAS-Ask1K618M mutant were also performed with dpp-Gal4. Both the ptc-Gal4 and dpp-Gal4 drivers show a similar pattern of expression in a stripe of cells. The controls carried ptc-Gal4 UAS-GFP (ptc>GFP), whereas the other genotypes were stained with the anti-Ptc antibody to identify ptc zone.
A recombinant of two UAS lines was used to activate the PI3K/Akt pathway – UAS-Pdk1:UAS-Akt1 (Pdk1:Akt in the text and figures). The expression of UAS-Pdk1:UAS-Akt1 and the other transgenes was controlled by the thermo-sensitive Gal4 repressor tubGal80TS.
Drosophila crosses were cultured to lay eggs for 24 h at 17°C. Embryos were kept at 17°C until the 7th day (168 h) after egg laying to prevent UAS-Pdk1:UAS-Akt1 expression. Larvae were subsequently moved to 29°C for 24 h and then the imaginal discs from wandering larvae were dissected and processed for staining and immunofluorescence studies.
Immunofluorescence and the TUNEL assay
Immunostainings were performed using standard protocols. The primary antibodies used in this study were: the cleaved Drosophila Dcp1 antibody (Cell Signaling, 9578S; 1:200), anti-Ptc antibody (DSHB; 1:100), anti-P-p38 antibody (Cell Signaling, 9211S; 1:50), anti-P-Akt antibody (S473, Cell Signaling; 1:100), the rabbit anti-ACTIVE JNK pAb (V7931, Promega; 1:100), anti-MMP1 antibody (DSHB, 14A3D; 1:200) and anti-nubbin antibody (1:50; from S. Cohen, University of Copenhagen, Denmark). The anti-ACTIVE JNK pAb antibody (anti-P-JNK) also labels mitoses as spindle pole proteins associate with JNK (Lim et al., 2015), and responds to the ectopic activation of the wild-type form of the JNKK licorne (UAS-licWT) and a dominant-negative form of the JNK basket (UAS-bskDN) (Fig. S2). The anti-phospho-Ask1(Thr845) polyclonal antibody (Cell Signaling, 3765; 1:200) was also used, which labels residues surrounding Thr845 of mouse ASK1 only when Thr845 is phosphorylated. This antibody (P-Thr in Fig. S1) was used to monitor Ask1 activity.
Fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies were from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Nucleic acid staining was performed by incubating discs for 10 min with 1 μM TO-PRO-3 (TP-3) or 10 µg/ml of DAPI (Life Technologies). The discs were mounted in SlowFade (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
For the detection of apoptotic cells, we also used the TUNEL assay. We employed the fluorescently labeled Alexa Fluor 647-aha-dUTP (Thermo Fisher Scientific), incorporated using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Roche). Apoptosis was also detected after cleaved Drosophila Dcp1 antibody immunofluorescence.
For the confocal images, a Zeiss LSM880 and a Leica SPE confocal laser scanning microscopes were used. Images were analyzed using FIJI. Data on mean pixel intensity graphics were collected from the ptc zone. A Leica DMLB microscope was used for taking pictures of the adult wings.
Genetic ablation and the dual Gal4/LexA transactivation system
For adult wing regeneration analysis, we used a dual Gal4/LexA transactivation system. We used the salE/Pv-LHG and LexO-rpr strains for genetic ablation, using the same design as that for Gal4/UAS. The LHG is a modified version of lexA that contains the activation domain of Gal4 separated with a hinge construct. This form is suppressible by tubGal80TS (Yagi et al., 2010). The Gal-4 line used was nubbin-Gal4 (nub>), which is expressed in the entire wing pouch. UAS-GFP (GFP) on an antibody against Nubbin (Nub) were used to monitor the nub>zone.
Animals laid eggs for 6 h at 17°C. Embryos were kept at 17°C until day 8 (192 h after egg laying) to prevent rpr expression. They were subsequently moved to 29°C for 11 h and then back to 17°C to allow the tissue to regenerate. Two types of controls were used in parallel for each genotype: (1) individuals carrying UAS-GFP as the neutral transgene, which were moved to 29°C for 11 h, as in the experimental condition; and (2) individuals kept continuously at 17°C to avoid any transgene activation to control for possible effects of transgene insertion. Colored bars in histograms correspond to the experiments of cell death induction and transgene expression conducted at 29°C. Gray bars correspond to the control experiments performed at 17°C without cell death induction or transgene expression. From the experiments performed at 29°C, a representative anomalous wing phenotype is shown in the corresponding figures. In addition we scored wing pattern and size of the different transgenes expressed under the nub-Gal4 in unablated discs.
Nutrient restriction conditions
One liter of Drosophila medium contained 64 g of fresh yeast, 67.2 g of dextrose, 40 g of wheat flour and 8.8 g of Bacto agar, here referred to as standard medium (or 100% yeast food). Food for nutrient restriction (or 10% yeast food) was made by reducing the amount of yeast (6.4 g/l) without altering the other ingredients. All crosses and experiments were performed under non-crowding conditions.
Nutrient restriction experiments were performed as follows. Embryos were cultured at 17°C. On day 7 (168 h) after egg laying, the larvae were removed from their standard food conditions, washed in PBS and transferred to a tube with only 10% yeast. In the control animals, the same procedure was followed, except that they were transferred to another tube containing standard food. On day 8 (192 h) after egg laying, the larvae were then moved to 29°C for 11 h to activate the whole set of transgenes as the inhibitor Gal80 is inactive at this temperature. After that, the larvae were transferred to 17°C to allow the tissue to regenerate. Thus, from 24 h before cell death induction, during the cell ablation period and during the entire regeneration process up to adulthood, the larvae were in conditions of nutrient restriction.
To exclude any toxicity due to the insertion of the transgene, all experiments were carried out in parallel, but constantly at 17°C to maintain tubGal80TS activity and block transgene (UAS- or lexO-) expression. Under these conditions, no defects in patterning were detected. However, all the flies raised under starvation conditions had smaller wings compared with flies reared on normal food.
To test the capacity to regenerate in different genetic backgrounds, we examined adult wings obtained from salE/Pv>rpr individuals in which patterning and size defects can be scored easily. Flies were fixed in glycerol:ethanol (1:2) for 24 h. The wings were dissected in water and then washed with ethanol. Subsequently, they were mounted in lactic acid:ethanol (6:5), and analyzed and imaged under a microscope.
The percentage of regenerated wings refers to fully regenerated (for genetic ablation genotypes) or normally developed wings (for testing transgenes), and was calculated according to the number of wings present with a complete set of veins and interveins as markers of normal patterning. Wing areas were measured as an indication of wing size. Areas of the mounted wings were outlined and scored using FIJI.
In all the figures (wing areas and mean pixel intensity graphics), data are mean±s.e.m.. To make statistical comparisons, we used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post-hoc test to make pair comparisons between each group using IBM SPSS Statistics. Significance is indicated in the figures only when P<0.05, as follows: *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
We thank Hugo Stocker, Mar Fernández, Paula Santa Bárbara, Carlos Camilleri and Paula Climent for their comments. We thank Manel Bosch from the CCiT-UB imaging facilities for support and Concepcion Arenas for advice on statistical analysis.
Conceptualization: M.C., F.S.; Methodology: J.E.; Validation: J.E.; Formal analysis: J.E., M.C., F.S.; Investigation: J.E., F.S.; Data curation: J.E.; Writing - original draft: F.S.; Writing - review & editing: J.E., M.C., F.S.; Supervision: F.S.; Project administration: M.C., F.S.; Funding acquisition: M.C., F.S.
This research was funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades (PGC2018-099763-B-I00 to F.S. and M.C.), by the Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA Academia award to M.C.) and by the Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (2017SGR1455 to F.S. and M.C.).
Peer review history
The peer review history is available online at https://journals.biologists.com/dev/article-lookup/doi/10.1242/dev.197087
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.