Embryonic development involves extensive and often rapid cell proliferation. An unavoidable side effect of cell proliferation is DNA damage. The consequences of spontaneous DNA damage during development are not clear. Here, we define an approach to determine the effects of DNA damage on cell fate choice. Using single cell transcriptomics, we identified a subpopulation of Dictyostelium cells experiencing spontaneous DNA damage. Damaged cells displayed high expression of rad51, with the gene induced by multiple types of genotoxic stress. Using live imaging, we tracked high Rad51 cells from differentiation onset until cell fate assignment. High Rad51 cells were shed from multicellular structures, excluding damaged cells from the spore population. Cell shedding resulted from impaired cell motility and defective cell-cell adhesion, with damaged cells additionally defective in activation of spore gene expression. These data indicate DNA damage is not insulated from other aspects of cell physiology during development and multiple features of damaged cells prevent propagation of genetic error. Our approach is generally applicable for monitoring rare subpopulations during development, and permits analysis of developmental perturbations occurring within a physiological dynamic range.
An inevitable consequence of the extensive cell proliferation occurring during embryonic development is that cells will suffer spontaneous DNA damage. Although many causes of DNA damage are associated with external factors, a large proportion of damage is incidental to normal cell metabolism and physiology (Lindahl and Barnes, 2000). Despite the high frequency at which spontaneous DNA damage occurs, we have very limited understanding of how cells react to this stress during development.
Most studies of DNA damage responses (DDRs) are carried out using treatments of large doses of a DNA-damaging agent. Although highly useful for understanding the biochemistry of induced DDRs, these extreme treatments do not reveal how cells normally deal with spontaneous DNA damage in a developmental context. Characterisation of spontaneous DDRs is complicated because the lack of synchronicity of damage between cells masks the cell response (Karanam et al., 2012; Uphoff et al., 2016). As a result, it is unclear to what extent cell fate choice is insulated from the effects of DNA damage. Are cells repaired and reintegrated? Alternatively, are they excluded or marginalised from normal development?
To determine the effects of spontaneous DNA damage during development requires the ability to identify and then follow the damaged cells in tissues. Identification of specific cell states in complex differentiating tissues can be achieved using single cell transcriptomics (Briggs et al., 2018; Farrell et al., 2018; Wagner et al., 2018). These methods provide a snapshot in time of the cell state, but they cannot follow a single cell over time. To understand how a specific cell will behave during development also requires live cell imaging, to directly monitor developmental outcome of the cell in question (Meyer et al., 2017; Pelaez et al., 2015).
In this study, we have determined the fates of cells undergoing spontaneous DNA damage, by combining single cell transcriptomics with long-term live imaging of single cells during the development of Dictyostelium. We have identified a subpopulation of undifferentiated cells undergoing spontaneous DNA damage. Tracking the damaged cells during differentiation revealed the cells are shed from the rear of the migrating multicellular phase. Contributions to this shedding phenotype come from an impairment in cell motility and a strong cell-cell adhesion defect displayed by the damaged cells. Damaged cells also showed impaired induction of spore-specific gene expression. This work demonstrates a combination of approaches to test the effects of cellular stress on developmental processes, and reveals multiple mechanisms by which development can exclude cells that are undesirable to propagate to the next generation.
Populations of apparently equivalent cells can show a tremendous amount of variability in gene expression, suggesting hidden subpopulations of cells with different phenotypic states (Symmons and Raj, 2016). To reveal potential subpopulations, we analysed single cell transcriptome data of undifferentiated Dictyostelium cells (Antolović et al., 2017) to identify genes expressed with a high level of variability. Data were plotted to reveal the variability in the expression of each gene [Fig. 1A; genes below the line (such as act5) are less variable than average]. One of the most variably expressed genes was rad51, which encodes a conserved eukaryotic protein required for the repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination (Chapman et al., 2012).
To test whether variable expression could be detected at the protein level, we generated a knock-in cell line, with the fast-folding fluorescent protein mNeonGreen (Neon) (Shaner et al., 2013) inserted at the 3′ end of the rad51 coding sequence. Although Dictyostelium are haploid, the parental strain has a duplication of the chromosomal region containing the rad51 gene, which allows tagging of one locus while leaving the other for normal physiological function. Expression of the Rad51-Neon reporter was highly variable, with a rare (<1%) population of cells showing strong nuclear staining and the remainder of the population showing only weak basal expression (Fig. 1B). This variable expression contrasted the more uniform expression of an act5 (actin) knock-in reporter. These expression properties of Rad51 were also demonstrated using flow cytometry (Fig. 1C). Most cells had higher fluorescence than parental cells, indicating weak basal expression in the bulk of the population, and a few cells had very high Rad51 expression. This distinctive variability implies heterogeneous Rad51 expression marks specific subpopulations of undifferentiated cells.
What underlying cell state does high Rad51 expression represent? Rad51 is required for repair of DSBs (Chapman et al., 2012), and also assists in repairing other types of DNA damage (Carr and Lambert, 2013). We therefore suspected cells with high Rad51 reporter expression were undergoing spontaneous DNA damage. To test this, we stained Rad51-Neon cells with an antibody against phospho-H2AX, a DNA damage marker (Fig. 2A, Fig. S1A,B). This revealed a good correlation (r=0.63, average from three replicates), implying considerable overlap between the high Rad51 state and DNA damage. We then tested whether high Rad51 cells are undergoing DNA damage by measuring correlations between expression of rad51 and other genes linked to DNA damage, from single cell transcriptomic data from undifferentiated cells (Antolović et al., 2017). Rad51 expression was strongly correlated with expression of many other DNA damage response genes (Fig. 2B). Additionally, we searched for all transcripts correlated with rad51 at r>0.5. Of the 30 genes identified by these criteria (Table S1), 25 are directly involved in DNA repair or replication. Similar to rad51, we found that most GO-annotated DNA repair genes are more variable than the transcriptome average (Fig. S1C).
The transcripts correlated with rad51, categorised by the types of damage they respond to, are not related to a single repair process (Fig. 2B, Table S1). For example, correlated transcripts include adprt2 and adprt1a (non-homologous end-joining), apeA (base excision repair), rad50 (DSB repair) and rnrA (replication stress), suggesting rad51 can be induced by multiple forms of DNA damage. In support of this idea, treatment of Rad51-Neon cells with several different DNA-damaging agents strongly induces reporter expression (Fig. 2C). Dictyostelium has been previously shown to be strongly resistant to different types of DNA damage (Hsu et al., 2006; Hudson et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2009), so we used high doses for most agents. We observed the strongest Rad51 induction by hydroxurea (HU) and camptothecin (CPT), which impair de novo dNTP synthesis and Topo I, respectively. Cisplatin (DNA crosslinker) and methyl methanesulphonate (MMS, methylates DNA) also showed clear effects. Mitomycin C (DNA crosslinker) and etoposide (inhibits Topo II) elicited weak effects, as did bleomycin (DSBs). Although bleomycin induced strong Rad51 expression at 300 mU (Fig. S1D), this is two orders of magnitude more bleomycin than required for cell cycle arrest in Dictyostelium (Muramoto and Chubb, 2008). It was surprising that an agent causing DSBs only weakly induced a molecule central to DSB repair. However, as basal Rad51 is expressed in all cells, this basal level may be sufficient to deal with incidental DSBs, with high Rad51 induction required to assist responses to other forms of genotoxic stress. In summary, we propose the high Rad51 state represents a broad response to multiple types of DNA damage.
Dynamics of Rad51 expression
To determine how long the high Rad51 state persists for, we flow-sorted high and low Rad51-Neon cells, then monitored the fluorescence of cells at different times after sorting. More than 50% of the high-sorted cells were still classed as high 1 day post-sorting (Fig. S2A,B). This proportion continued to fall, and by 6 days, was close to the starting value of the unsorted population. Surprisingly, a small proportion of the low-sorted population induced Rad51 during the post-sort recovery. We interpret this as an effect of the sorting process, perhaps caused by DNA damage in response to mechanical stress (Raab et al., 2016) or cross-protection between stress-response pathways (Yaakov et al., 2017). The average long-term clonal recovery of sorted high Rad51 cells was not impaired, although recovery was more variable (Fig. S2C). The developmental morphology of the sorted high and low Rad51 cells was also similar (Fig. S2D). Together, these data indicate that the high Rad51 cells revert to basal Rad51 expression levels within a few days, and have no clear long-term viability phenotype.
To gain insight into the Rad51 induction process, we carried out long-term time-lapse imaging of Rad51-Neon cells. For long-term tracking of rare events in populations of motile cells, it was necessary to image several thousand cells to obtain 21 clear Rad51 induction profiles. We observed three classes of Rad51 induction profile, plotted as intensity time series in Fig. 2D and Fig. S3. In the first example (Fig. 2D, left) related cells showed correlated induction. The initial cell (purple) showed a modest increase in overall fluorescence before dividing, after which the fluorescence reduced. The two daughters (blue and pink) showed only small increases. In the granddaughter generation, both progeny of the pink cell (red) showed a strong Rad51 induction. In this lineage, Rad51 expression plateaued after 3-4 h, remaining high in both granddaughters, which failed to divide before the end of the movie. In contrast, other sister pairs showed uncorrelated Rad51 induction (Fig. 2D, centre). One daughter (pink) rapidly induced Rad51 and took a long time to divide, whereas the other daughter divided rapidly without Rad51 induction. Overall, 8/21 of the lineages traced showed correlated induction and 8/21 showed uncorrelated induction. Of the remaining cells, three could not be unambiguously classified and two showed a different behaviour (Fig. 2D, right), where sisters were correlated, but the increase in one sister was deferred a generation. Correlated increases may result from damage to the mother cell, with the damage passed to both daughters. Uncorrelated increases imply damage specific to one daughter only. Deferred increases possibly suggest a metastable feature of the cell state that enhances the probability of a substantial damage event. Again, these studies imply different forms of DNA damage can give rise to the high Rad51 state.
Other features of the response to spontaneous DNA damage emerged from lineage analysis. Firstly, the cell cycles of damaged cells were of longer duration than those with low rad51 expression (Fig. 2E). The correlation of rad51 expression and cycle time is modest (r=0.37, averaged over four experiments), contrasting standard DNA damage studies involving experimental administration of genotoxic stress, in which sharp population-wide arrest occurs. The correlation we observed may reflect a lower bound estimate, as imaging windows bias against capture of longer duration events. Secondly, although their cycles tended to last longer, we observed ten divisions of high Rad51 cells (Fig. 2D, Fig. S3). In 9/10 cases, the high Rad51 cells divided their fluorescence roughly equally between the daughters, without daughters approaching the levels of the initial induction. Only a single damaged cell (Fig. 2D, centre) had progeny with Rad51 re-induction to the same level as the parental cell. This implies that in cells that divide, the damage response usually begins to decay upon completion of the cell cycle. Finally, the mean time of induction of Rad51-Neon (defined as when daughter intensity exceeds the pre-mitotic value) is 126 min post-mitosis, with a low variability (s.d.=48). This timing might be explained if Rad51 induction is triggered by detection of DNA damage by the cell during S phase, which occurs immediately after mitosis in Dictyostelium (Weijer et al., 1984).
To further investigate the cell cycle disruption occurring in response to spontaneous DNA damage, we expressed mCherry-PCNA in Rad51-Neon cells (Fig. S4A). During mitosis, PCNA distributes through the cell as the nuclear envelope perforates, then rapidly binds to the separated chromatids as nuclei reform (arrows) (Muramoto and Chubb, 2008; Stevense et al., 2010). With no G1, DNA replication begins immediately after mitosis. Twenty minutes into the new cell cycle, PCNA is enriched at heterochromatin (late S phase; arrowheads). Comparing high and low Rad51 cells showed effects on multiple cycle phases (Fig. S4B). Mitosis was longer (P=0.0014) and early S phase shorter (P<0.0001) in high Rad51 cells, with late S phase not significantly altered (P=0.073). Differences were slight, indicating most of the increase in cycle duration in high Rad51 cells is explained by an extended G2. We observed no obvious disruption of the characteristic S-phase PCNA morphology in high Rad51 cells, after or prior to Rad51 induction. During the cell cycle in which Rad51 was induced, but prior to induction, we observed durations of mitosis, early and late S phase similar to those of basal Rad51 expressers (Fig. S4B).
Fate of cells undergoing spontaneous DNA damage
Upon starvation, Dictyostelium cells undergo a simple differentiation programme, whereby individual cells aggregate together into a multicellular mound, before differentiating into two major cell types: stalk and spore (Williams, 2006). To determine the fate of the high Rad51 cells during development, we imaged cells from the start of differentiation until slug formation, which occurs after cells decide their fates (Thompson et al., 2004). Imaging large fields of view allowed tracking cells during the rapid motility and chemotaxis underlying aggregation (Fig. 3A; Movies 1 and 2). Early in development, cells are relatively stationary. As pulsatile extracellular cAMP signalling begins, cells undergo large-scale chemotaxis into streams, which merge into mounds. Most high Rad51 cells underwent chemotaxis into streams, indicating they differentiated to aggregation competence. The expression of Rad51-Neon remained relatively stable during the chemotaxis phase (Fig. S5A). Most high Rad51 cells engaged with mounds; however, by the end of aggregation, many of the brighter cells resided at mound edges (Fig. 3A,B).
To quantify this edge recruitment, mounds were divided into two concentric regions of equal area (Fig. 3C). We found that the high Rad51 cells were enriched more in the outer region than in the inner region, in contrast to the more uniform distribution of cells expressing Neon or GFP from an endogenous actin (act5) promoter (Fig. 3D) (P=4.7×10−7 and 6.1×10−10, respectively). The position of high Rad51 cells can be dynamic, with some cells switching between outside and centre (Fig. 3E).
What is the fate of the high Rad51 cells as development proceeds further? To address this, we imaged the distribution of high-expressing cells as the aggregates become motile (the slug phase). In many slugs, there was a strong enrichment of high Rad51 cells at the rear (Fig. 4A, Fig. S5B). To quantify this, slug images were divided into four equal areas, from anterior to posterior (Fig. 4B). The control was 1% act5-Neon cells mixed with unlabelled wild types, which showed no strong bias towards specific slug regions (Fig. 4C, right panel; Fig. S5B). For identifying Rad51-Neon cells, which, unlike act5, have a highly variable expression level, we used a multiple threshold approach, to avoid user biases in identifying a cell as either high or low. We scored the frequency of high cells in each area, by considering multiple thresholds for what constitutes a bright cell. At low thresholds, where more cells are considered ‘bright’, the slugs had a more uniform distribution of Rad51, with slight enrichment at the front and rear. At higher thresholds, where fewer cells are ‘bright’, the distribution of the cells was more enriched at the rear (Fig. 4C). This indicates that the higher the Rad51-Neon expression, the greater its rear tendency. It initially seemed possible that the rear-localisation of high Rad51-Neon cells might be caused by some emergent effect of a C-terminal fusion of Neon to Rad51. To test this possibility, we inserted Neon at the 5′ end of the Rad51 locus, with a series of STOP codons and a selectable marker before the Rad51 coding sequence (rad51-NeonGR). Cells expressing high levels of this Neon reporter were also localised to the rear of slugs, indicating that the localisation of high Rad51-Neon cells was not an effect of the fusion of Rad51 to a reporter (Fig. 4C; middle).
Many slugs showed a trail containing bright Rad51-Neon cells, suggesting slugs were losing bright cells at their rear. This suggestion was confirmed by live imaging of the multicellular phases of development (Fig. 4D, Movies 3 and 4). Fig. 4D shows a mound as it converts into a slug. The high Rad51 cells initially engaged with the mound, often internal to it, and in some cases were highly migratory within the structure (red arrow). However, as the structure began to migrate away, almost all the bright cells were left behind.
The shedding of high Rad51 cells means they are less likely to become spores, and images of fruiting bodies show no high Rad51 cells in the spore head (Fig. 4E) although a few remain in stalk lineages, such as in the lower cup and basal disc area, perhaps reflecting the partial enrichment in the anterior zone of the slug (Fig. 4C), from which stalk cells are derived. The relative abundance of the high Rad51 cells was reminiscent of sentinels, the Dictyostelium immune-like cells (Chen et al., 2007). However, we found no correlation between Rad51-Neon expression and ethidium bromide uptake, which marks sentinels, in either intact slugs or dissociated cells (Fig. S5C,D).
Impaired motility and cell-cell adhesion of high Rad51 cells
What features of the high Rad51 cells cause them to detach from aggregates? The high Rad51 cells displayed a slightly increased cell volume (Fig. 5A). The overall correlation between volume and Rad51 expression was weak; however, the majority of the brightest 1% of cells were larger than average. This may be caused by the extended cell cycles and a slightly increased frequency of multinucleate cells in the high Rad51 population (high Rad51: 29±3%; low 15±8%; three replicates). An increase in cell size may alter the physical ability of a cell to enter and move within multicellular structures. It may also have different adhesive properties, and potentially different amounts of signalling receptors on its surface.
To test the potential effects of an increase in cell size on cell fate, we monitored the developmental behaviour of diploid strains mixed into haploids. Dictyostelium cells are normally haploid, but can form stable diploids. Diploid cells develop robustly (King and Insall, 2003) and are slightly larger than haploids (Fig. S6A). Can this increased size drive cell shedding? When diploids (labelled with Neon and mScarlet) were mixed into haploid slugs (labelled with Neon), we found the opposite (Fig. 5B,C). Diploids were not shed from the rear of slugs in significant numbers, and instead were slightly enriched at the slug anterior. Although this anterior distribution may also relate to diploid-specific features, it does not provide evidence that increased cell size causes cell shedding.
Cells are highly motile in the mound and slug, with centre of the mound and anterior of the slug acting as chemotactic signalling centres (Weijer, 2004). A defect in chemotaxis or cell motility would impair the ability of a cell to migrate to the centre of the mound, or anterior of a slug. Are chemotaxis and motility phenotypes associated with the high Rad51 state? To test this, we imaged Rad51-Neon cells during chemotactic aggregation and measured the speed and directionality of high and low Rad51 cells (Fig. S6B). The directionality of the high Rad51 cells was not significantly perturbed (Fig. 5D); however, we found a reduction of cell speed in the high Rad51 state (Fig. 5E). Closer analysis of single cell behaviours during chemotaxis revealed most high Rad51 cells had normal cell speeds, but a significant minority were nearly immobile (Fig. 5F). These measurements were taken on cells before they entered the multicellular structures; however, similar behaviours were clearly identified in multicellular aggregates (Fig. 4D, Movies 3 and 4) with some cells retaining high motility before being shed, and others appearing static throughout the movie. In general, the multicellular environment is likely to place a greater obstacle to cell motility, potentially exacerbating this partially penetrant effect on motility observed in isolated cells.
Forming and maintaining the multicellular stages also requires cell-cell adhesion (Loomis, 2015). Could an adhesion defect contribute to the shedding of the high Rad51 cells? There was no clear signature in our single cell transcriptomic data that cells with DNA damage have impaired regulation of adhesion genes. Fig. S6C shows the correlations, in mound-stage expression data (Antolović et al., 2019), between rad51 and transcripts of genes with annotated roles in adhesion. No transcripts showed strong positive or negative correlations with rad51. To test more directly the possibility that high Rad51 cells have defective adhesion, we used a cell re-aggregation assay (Xu et al., 1996) (Fig. 6A). Mounds were disaggregated to single cells, then images captured to allow an initial cell count and to establish the signal intensity corresponding to an upper 1% intensity threshold. For robust thresholding, we counted around 7500 cells per replicate. The cells were then allowed to adhere to each other. The null hypothesis was that the high Rad51 cells would aggregate in proportion to their overall fraction of the population. If true, we would expect 1% of the non-aggregated population would be high Rad51. We tested for both divalent cation-dependent and -independent adhesion effects. In the presence of divalent cations (Mg2+ and Ca2+), high Rad51 cells were strongly enriched in the non-adherent pool, compared with the expected 1% null value (χ2 test: P<0.0001; Fig. 6B). The scale of this effect indicates the high Rad51 cells are over 5-fold more likely to remain non-adherent than low Rad51 cells (Fig. S7). In contrast, without divalent cations (EDTA), where adhesion is much weaker, the high Rad51 cells showed a similar ability to adhere as the rest of the population. We conclude that the high Rad51 cells show a divalent cation-dependent adhesion defect.
Impaired prespore marker induction in high Rad51 cells
Is the lack of high Rad51 cells in the spore population solely because reduced adhesion and motility give rise to shedding, or are high Rad51 cells additionally blocked from entering the spore differentiation pathway? To test for the latter possibility, we transformed Rad51-Neon cells with an extra-chromosomal plasmid expressing mCherry under the control of the promoter of the prespore gene pspA. The transformed cells were developed to the mound stage, disaggregated and the fluorescence levels of individual cells measured using flow cytometry. Flow plots for control Rad51-Neon cells are shown in Fig. 6C and Fig. S8A. The plots for Rad51-Neon cells transformed with the pspA-mCherry vector show a strong induction of red fluorescence; however, this is only in the low Neon fluorescence part of the spectrum (Fig. 6D). Using a 1% cut-off to separate high and low Rad51 Neon cells shows that the high cells barely induced this prespore marker (χ2 test: P<0.00001; Fig. 6E). This implies the high Rad51 cells have a spore differentiation block, in addition to motility and adhesion effects on cell retention in aggregates. Analysis of mound single cell transcriptomic data (Antolović et al., 2019) does not provide clear indications why high Rad51 cells fail to differentiate as spores. Rare cells expressing high levels of rad51 mRNA can be identified in mound cells prior to fate separation (Fig. S8B, arrow), consistent with the idea that damaged cells can adopt a temporally normal mound expression state.
Using a combination of single cell gene expression methods, we have identified a subpopulation of undifferentiated Dictyostelium cells undergoing spontaneous DNA damage, marked by high levels of Rad51 expression. Several lines of evidence suggest multiple forms of damage can cause the high Rad51 state. The long-term viability of high Rad51 cells was not strongly impaired, although short-term increases in cell cycle duration were detected. We tracked the high Rad51-expressing cells from the onset of development through to the multicellular stages of development, and observed that these cells are preferentially shed from multicellular structures. The shedding of the damaged cells was associated with reduced motility and adhesion, which are likely to impair the ability of cells to remain within the multicellular aggregate. In addition, the damaged cells have a strong impairment in the induction of gene expression associated with spore differentiation. These features of the damaged cells combine to prevent the cells contributing their genetic material to the next generation of cells.
What happens to the cells after they are shed? Although excluded from the fruiting body, discarded cells have the potential to dedifferentiate on bacterial food sources, then re-enter the developmental programme within a few days (Kuzdzal-Fick et al., 2007). This may provide an option to the organism for local geographical expansion, by throwing away damaged cells, giving them a chance of survival, whilst at the same time protecting the integrity of the spore population. Not all the discarded cells had high Rad51, suggesting shedding also occurs in response to other forms of stress. Consistent with this idea, mutants of Dictyostelium with defective fat metabolism also fail to efficiently enter the spore population (Kornke and Maniak, 2017).
The effects of DNA damage are not insulated from several aspects of cell physiology, with a loss of spore-generating potential linked to multiple causes. A possible cause of the impairment in the spore differentiation response may originate from the regulation of the cell cycle. In the late mound and early slug, prespore cells undergo a wave of cell division (Zimmerman and Weijer, 1993). Any process, such as DNA damage, that delays or otherwise interferes with cell cycle progression, might impair the development of the spore fate.
We expect that the combination of approaches we implemented here will be directly applicable to investigating the response to spontaneous DNA damage in more complex developmental systems. Many DDR transcripts were heterogeneously expressed, and, like Rad51, many of these proteins are conserved throughout eukaryotes, providing a rich set of candidates for investigation.
More generally, our approach is suitable for studying the behaviour of rare cell populations in complex tissues, for example in the study of lineage priming, or other forms of stress, such as in cell competition. The ability to directly visualise the behaviour of a natural perturbation, rather than an experimental treatment, gives an improved physiological context for understanding how cells manage stimuli during development, in their normal niche, within the physiological range of stimuli, with a realistic level and balance in the activation of the many cell response pathways. By identifying markers of the natural response, and following these markers over time until fate can be ascertained, we can approach a more meaningful understanding of the dynamics and regulation of tissue composition during development.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Dictyostelium cells were cultured at 22°C in HL5 medium (Formedium) or on SM agar plates with Klebsiella lawns as a nutrient source. Cell lines were validated by Southern blotting and PCR, and maintained using selection against bacteria in HL5 media (Formedium). Cells never exceeded confluence and were discarded after 10 days of culture. For development, cells were re-suspended in KK2 buffer (20 mM KPO4, pH 6.2) and deposited on 1.5% non-nutrient agar in KK2, at a density of 3.5×105 cells/cm2. After allowing cells to settle, KK2 was removed and cells were incubated in a humid box (22°C). Diploids were generated as described (King and Insall, 2003), combining AX3 cells expressing either mNeonGreen (blasticidin resistant) or mScarlet (hygromycin resistant; Paschke et al., 2018) from the act5 locus (Muramoto et al., 2012). After 10-14 days selection in blasticidin and hygromycin, the culture containing only double-resistant/double-fluorescent cells was expanded and used directly. For labelling sentinel cells, 3 µg/ml ethidium bromide was added to the agar, with multicellular structures disaggregated, when required, by passing them 15 times through a 23 G needle. For inducing DNA damage, we used overnight treatments of bleomycin sulphate (Sigma, B1141000), CPT (Sigma, C9911), etoposide (Sigma, E1383), hydroxyurea (Sigma, H8627), mitomycin C (MMC) (Sigma, M0503), cisplatin (Sigma, C2210000) and MMS (Sigma, 129925).
Cell-sorting was performed at the UCL GOS ICH Flow Cytometry Core Facility using a MoFlo XDP running IntelliSort software. Flow cytometry used a BD LSR II cell analyser running BD FACS Diva Software v6.1.3 (BD Biosciences). FlowJo software was used for data analysis and graphic rendering.
Generation of recombinant cell lines
We generated a fluorescent Rad51 reporter cell line by targeting a Dictyostelium codon-optimised sequence encoding mNeonGreen (Neon) (Tunnacliffe et al., 2018) at the 3′ end of the rad51 coding sequence, generating an in-frame Rad51-Neon fusion. We used AX3 cells and for cell tracking, we used AX3 cells previously engineered to express a red fluorescent nuclear marker (H2Bv3-mCherry) (Corrigan and Chubb, 2014). The targeting vector contained a left homology arm spanning nucleotides 1276 to 2232 of the rad51 genomic sequence (Basu et al., 2015) (TAA is at 2233). Following this was a linker encoding GPVQRS, followed by Neon. After the STOP codon of Neon followed the blasticidin resistance cassette, then the right homology arm, spanning from 2193 to 2686. Single copy insertions of the correct size were confirmed by Southern blots. To generate the gene replacement Rad51-Neon cell line (rad51-NeonGR), the left homology arm spanned the promoter (406-1021) and the right arm spanned 1115-1998 of the rad51 genomic sequence. For this vector, Neon is preceded by the first seven amino acids of rad51 and the HindIII encoded linker, CT. The pspA-mCherry expression vector was derived by cloning a −538 to +27 fragment (+1 is the A of ATG) containing the promoter and initial codons of pspA upstream of mCherry in extra-chromosomal vector pDM1097.
For immunostaining with anti-phospho-H2A.X, cells were stained with primary antibody against phospho-histone H2A.X (Ser139) (Cell Signaling Technology, 9718). For cell volume measurements, we used a Leica SP8 confocal. Rad51-Neon cells were stained with FM 4-64. Excitation used a white light laser (3.4% power) at 495 nm for both channels with emission windows 510-553 nm for Neon and 586-709 for FM 4-64, using HyD detectors. For diploid/haploid size measurements, we used the total cell fluorescence of mNeonGreen and mScarlet signals. For all size measurements, the pinhole was 65.3 μm (∼1 AU at 580 nm). Voxel dimensions were 569 nm×569 nm×349 nm (z-axis).
For imaging of multicellular development stages, cells were developed on KK2 agar. Prior to imaging, 1 cm2 squares of agar were excised, then inverted onto Delta TPG imaging dishes (Bioptechs) and covered in mineral oil to prevent drying. Slugs were imaged, as 100 µm 3D stacks, on an inverted Zeiss epifluorescence microscope (Muramoto and Chubb, 2008) using a 25× multi-immersion objective. Mounds were imaged on a Vox spinning disc confocal microscope (Perkin Elmer), using a 20× objective, also as 3D stacks.
For live imaging of the transition from the unicellular feeding stage to multicellular aggregation and slug migration, we plated cells in KK2 buffer on a thin layer of 1.5% agar in Nunc two-well coverglass dishes. Excess buffer was removed, and the dish was wrapped in a thin layer of damp towel and sealed with Parafilm. Imaging used the Vox, using a 10× air objective, a 5-min capture interval, and 8-slice 3D stack with a 10.63-µm z-step. Laser powers and exposure times were optimised to minimise photo damage. For imaging the dynamics of cell motility during aggregation, we imaged starving cells under non-nutrient agar using epifluorescence, using a 25× oil objective, at 40 s intervals on the Zeiss microscope.
For imaging the long-term cell-cycle dynamics of cells, cells were grown for 2 days in KK2/Klebsiella (OD10) in suspension, then plated with fresh Klebsiella (OD10) in 2-well dishes. 3D epifluorescence stacks were recorded on a Nikon N-STORM microscope, using a 20× DIC air objective and Andor Zyla camera, with a z-step size of 0.7 µm, every 5 min for 28-30 h. For imaging the dynamics of cell-cycle phases, we expressed mCherry-PCNA using an extra-chromosomal vector in the Rad51-Neon cells. Cells were imaged on an Olympus IX73 inverted epifluorescence microscope, using a Photometrics 95B Prime camera. z-stacks of 29 slices were captured at multiple xy positions every 3 min, with red and green excitation from 565 nm and 470 nm OptoLEDs (Cairn Research) and a 1.4 NA 60× objective, for 50 ms per channel per z-slice. Under these imaging conditions, we observed no induction of Rad51 by long-term light exposure (Fig. S9).
For measuring cell intensities during cell growth and aggregation, we used the ImageJ plug-in ‘Time Series Analyzer v3’. Cells were tracked until they became attached to streams or mounds. Directionality was defined as the distance between start and end points of the path divided by the total path length. Unless otherwise stated, we specified a threshold, in advance of analysis, on cell intensities of isolated cells to classify the 1% brightest cells as ‘high Rad51’ and the bottom 99% as ‘low Rad51’.
For measuring cell positions within mounds, the mound border was drawn manually in ImageJ, then the area of the selection was calculated and divided into two equal concentric areas. The detection threshold for high and low Rad51 expressers was estimated by eye on one mound, then applied automatically to all mounds captured within the same experimental day. We then calculated the ratio of the number of bright cells in the outer area versus number of bright cells in the inner area.
For measuring the position of bright cells in slugs, we first stitched partial slugs together using the ‘Pairwise Stitching’ ImageJ plug-in. The slug border was defined manually on maximal projections of the raw 3D stacks, and the area of the selection was calculated in ImageJ. The slug area was then divided into four equal parts, from anterior to posterior, and the number of high-expressing cells counted in each quarter. For control slugs (act5-Neon cells mixed 1:99 with wild-type cells) and haploid/diploid mixes, the high-expressing cells were identified using a manually determined threshold, as there was a clear and relatively homogeneous visual distinction between the expressing and non-expressing cells. For identifying Rad51-Neon and rad51-NeonGR cells, which have a highly variable expression level, we avoided user biases using a multiple threshold approach. We used a Particle Detection ImageJ plug-in (Sbalzarini and Koumoutsakos, 2005) with varying levels of threshold for particle detection and determined how the changing threshold affected the output distribution of bright cells. The range of thresholds was optimised to suit the reporter. For example, the rad51-NeonGR cells have fluorescence distributed uniformly around the cell, rather than concentrated in the nucleus, therefore required a lower range of detection thresholds to represent the data fairly. Unless stated otherwise, Mann–Whitney tests were used to assess the significance of differences between treatments.
For cell volume measurements, we used Imaris (Bitplane, v7.6). We created surface objects from the channel of interest using a standardised absolute threshold, manually determined for each experimental repeat. Surfaces touching the edge of the field of view were excluded, surfaces created by touching cells were manually split and object filters were applied to exclude cell fragments and large clumps of cells. For Rad51-mNeonGreen size measurements, we generated a binary membrane mask from surfaces made on FM 4-64 channel. The mask was exported to ImageJ where a custom plugin was used to fill in the cytoplasmic volume. This stack of binary images was then exported back into Imaris, where a new surface ‘object’ was created for volume and intensity statistics to be measured.
Cell adhesion assays
Mounds were disaggregated to single cells in 1 ml KK2+15 mM EDTA by repeated passage through a 20 G syringe. A 50 µl sample of the single cell suspension was placed in an eight-well coverglass chamber containing 200 µl KK2 for counting (t=0). For adhesion, the remainder of the cells were re-suspended in 1 ml KK2 with 1 mM MgCl2+1 mM CaCl2 or 1 ml KK2/15 mM EDTA in a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube, then shaken on an orbital shaking incubator at 150 rpm. After 1 h at the indicated times, 100 µl was taken. Cells were imaged with a 10× objective on the Zeiss inverted microscope. Sixteen optical sections, centred in the z-axis on cell nuclei, were captured at 2 µm spacing for both Rad51-Neon and H2B-mCherry detection channels for up to 25 fields of view.
Image processing and quantification was automated in ImageJ. To quantify the Rad51-mNeon signal of each cell in a field of view, a sum z-projection was generated for each of the fluorescence channels. Nuclei were identified by finding maxima of the H2B-mCherry signal. A circular region of interest, centred on the maxima, with a 3.5-pixel radius was created. The sum of all green-channel pixel intensities in this region of interest was calculated. For clustered samples, masks of single cells and two-cell clusters in the field of view were first generated using brightfield images, based on a user-defined size threshold. The Rad51-mNeon signal was then obtained as above, using the H2B maxima, in the masked image. To determine the threshold intensity above which cells could be categorised as high-Rad51, t=0 cells were ranked by intensity and the 99th percentile intensity value used as the threshold.
The MRC LMCB University Unit at UCL is supported by Medical Research Council funding (MC_U12266B). Imaging was carried out at the MRC LMCB Light Microscopy Facility. We are grateful to Vincent Plagnol and Jong Kyoung Kim for assistance with bioinformatics, Bao Xiu Tan and Gabriel Tarrason Risa for assistance with molecular biology, and Ed Tunnacliffe for assistance with imaging.
Conceptualization: A.M., V.A., J.R.C.; Methodology: A.M., V.A., T.L., J.R.C.; Software: V.A., T.L.; Validation: A.M., V.A., T.L., J.R.C.; Formal analysis: V.A., T.L.; Investigation: A.M., T.L., J.M.E.N., L.J.M., J.R.C.; Resources: A.M., J.M.E.N., L.J.M., J.R.C.; Data curation: A.M., V.A.; Writing - original draft: A.M., V.A., T.L., J.R.C.; Writing - review & editing: A.M., V.A., T.L., J.M.E.N., J.R.C.; Visualization: A.M., V.A., T.L.; Supervision: T.L., J.R.C., V.A.; Project administration: J.R.C.; Funding acquisition: J.R.C.
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Fellowship (202867/Z/16/Z to J.R.C.), a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council project grant (BB/K017004/1 to J.R.C.), a Human Frontier Science Program long-term fellowship (A.M.), and a Medical Research Council studentship from the LMCB Graduate Programme (L.J.M.). Deposited in PMC for release after 6 months.
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.